هذا إسمه عدم أمانة في الترجمة يا سودانيز أونلاين.. وهو يضر بمصداقية المنبر!!!!

Dear Yassir

I have attempted to establish the following facts

The news piece was originally issued by Reuters in Arabic – so if there are any issues with translation they are for Reuters to explain

Reuters then issued another piece using the same title, which absolves Sudaneseonline from any malice with regard to publishing the piece or the need to issue a correction

However, after more checking I noticed that the word
واضاف
in the third line is not part of either piece by Reuters

After more digging I discovered the piece as it appeared on Sudaneseonline was also published by the Jordanian Newspaper Al Ghad – I don’t know which came first

http://www.alghad.jo/?news=187038

Generally speaking I would say that News reporting on Sudaneseonline is weak because the premium is on labeling the news with Sudaneseonline rather than dealing with the fact that its primary function is one of a depository of news from primary or secondary sources. Only on a few occasions does it provides unique news from the Sudan

One way to limit damage from such posture is to always provide the link to the original piece


Bayan

If you were this unaware why not merely question the accuracy of the claim rather than paint the whole thing as a grand conspiracy in away that makes any further constructive dialogue all but impossible

I hope you find what Adil Osman posted convincing, if not please let me know what is – so I may be able to supply it if I have it or can get to it

Yes, Arab and not Arabized! Although it should be Arab as far as the piece is concerned, I personally think the latter is more accurate in this case


Thanks

= = = = = =
السودان لكل السودانيين
المجد لشعب السودان ... المجد لأمة السودان

(عدل بواسطة sultan on 07-16-2007, 02:38 AM)