|
|
 correction and appology from CQ about The Sudan nuclear site
|
ادارة دورية الكونجرس تصحح الخطأ وتعتذر
الاخوة الاعزاء تجدون ادناه تصحيحا واعتذترا وصلني من ادارة دورية الكونجرس (سي كيو) التي قامت بنشر محضر جلسة لجنة الخدمات العسكرية التي ورد فيها
عن طريق الخطأ الطباعي ان التجارب النووية عام 1962 تمت بالسودان ،وقم تم تصحيح الخطأ في السجلات الرسمية
ولكم الشكر على الصبر والمتابعة والاهتمام
ابراهيم علي ابارهيم
الاخوة الاعزاء
أدناه رسالة اخرى وصلتني من السيد/ سايمون مسشار التشريع بمكتب عضوة الكونجرس النائبة/ايلين توشر يؤكد فيه ان الخطأ هو مطبعي
typo،
في سجلات الكونجرس
والجدير بالذكر ان النائبة/ الين توشر هي التي كانت تقوم بتوجيه الاسئلة للسفير برووكس عندما تمت الاشار ة الى موضوع التجارب النووية
مرة اخرى لكم الشكر
ابرهيم
>From: "Ibrahim Al-Ibrahim"
>To:
>Subject: FW: The Sudan "nuclear site"!!
>Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:47:22 -0500
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Limage, Simon [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 06:45 PM
>To: Ibrahim Al-Ibrahim
>Subject: RE: The Sudan "nuclear site"!!
>
>
>
>You can tell you friends that this was a typing mistake in the
>transcript. The transcriber meant to write Sedan and NOT Sudan. The
>conversation was about the Sedan nuclear test in 1962 and has NOTHING to
>do with Sudan.
>
>
>
>Thank you.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: Ibrahim Al-Ibrahim [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:20 AM
>To: Limage, Simon
>Subject: The Sudan "nuclear site"!!
>
>
>
>Dear Simon,
>
>It was nice talking to you this morning.
>
>Bellow you will find the transcript and the terrible mistake made by
>the transcriber of the Armed Services Committee of the Congress. I got
>the doc from the CQ which I am a member of .
>
>
>
>This typo has embarrassed me and also stroke a lot of debate among the
>Sudanese community around the world.
>
>
>
>I would like you to ask them to correct this damaging honest mistake and
>let me know please.
>
>
>
>Thanks a lot Simon.
>
>Ibrahim
>
>
>
>This is the link and attached as well as word doc.
>
>http://www.cq.com/displayalert.do?matchId=6726983
>
>
>
>I think it page 26,,,
>
>There's a poster over there -- it's difficult to see and more difficult
>to read -- but it's basically a poster of the <
>
>Sudan>
>
>nuclear test site. I want to talk to you about RNEP, because it's a
>study that you're asking for us to fund again.
>
> In 1962 we took 100 kiloton nuclear warhead, we buried it 635 feet
>under the surface, which is deeper than any nuclear buster can dig, and
>we blew it up. As you can tell from the top picture, radiation was not
>trapped inside the earth and instead was spread above and beyond the
>target area.
>
> As you can see from the picture below, the <
>
>Sudan test displaced 12 million tons of earth and a dug crater 320 feet
>deep and over 1,000 feet in diameter.
>
> On December 18th, 1970, we conducted another test. The Bainberry
>used a 10 kiloton device, smaller than the Hiroshima weapon and probably
>much lower than the B83, and that was placed in the bottom of a sealed
>900-foot shaft. The shaft did not contain the explosion. It released a
>flow-out cloud that rose 10,000 feet in the air and tracked north to
>Canada.
>
> So, Ambassador Brooks, in both of these cases, the RNEP was buried
>and we controlled the environment. You've discussed this before in an
>unclassified environment. I just want to know: Is there any way an RNEP
>of any size that we would drop will not produce a huge amount of
>radioactive debris?
>
>
>BROOKS:
>
> No, there's not.
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست