|
|
 Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! (Re: محمد على طه الملك)
|
II. Methods of work
A. Sources of information
23. Mandate-holders are called upon to take account of all available sources of information that they consider to be credible and relevant. This includes information emanating from Governments, inter-governmental organizations, international and national non-governmental organizations, national human rights institutions, academic community, the victims of alleged human rights abuses, relatives of victims, and witnesses. Wherever feasible and appropriate mandate-holders should endeavour to consult and meet with such sources, and they should seek to cross-check information received to the best extent possible.
24. Because of the sensitivity of many of the issues that arise mandate-holders should be guided in their information-gathering activities by the principles of discretion, transparency, impartiality, and even-handedness. They should rely on objective and dependable facts based on evidentiary standards that are
appropriate to the non-judicial character of the reports and conclusions they are called upon to draw up. Appropriate opportunities should be provided for Government representatives to comment on allegations made
against them and for those alleging violations to comment on Governmental responses thereto.
25. Mandate holders may acknowledge receipt of information from individuals and organizations and provide an indication of outcomes or follow-up. Mandate-holders are not required to inform those who provide information about any subsequent measures they have taken. They may, however, choose to provide some information, but this would normally not involve disclosure of the specific contents of communications with Governments, unless an issue has been definitively dealt with by the government in question.
26. In the case of country visits full details of the action taken will be provided in the mandate-holder’s official report on his or her visit. In the case of communications a summary of the exchange of information will be provided in reports on communications submitted periodically to the Council.
27. Mandate-holders will take all feasible precautions to ensure that sources of information are not subjected to retaliation (Specific examples are contained in the sections below on Communications and Country Visits). Mandate-holders shall invite individuals and groups which have provided information and have suffered any form of reprisals or retaliation as a result to report all such incidents to the mandate-holder so that appropriate follow-up action can be taken.
B. Communications
1. Definition and purpose
28. Most Special Procedures provide for the relevant mandate-holders to receive information from different sources and to act on credible information by sending a communication to the relevant Government(s). Such communications are sent through diplomatic channels, unless agreed otherwise between individual Governments and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in relation to any actual or anticipated human rights violations which fall within the scope of their mandate.
29. Communications may deal with cases concerning individuals, groups or communities, with general trends and patterns of human rights violations in a particular country or more generally, or with the content of existing or draft legislation considered to be a matter of concern. Communications related to adopted or draft legislation may be formulated in various ways, as required by the specificities of each mandate.
30. Communications do not imply any kind of value judgment on the part of the Special Procedure concerned and are thus not per se accusatory. They are not intended as a substitute for judicial or other proceedings at the national level. Their main purpose is to obtain clarification in response to allegations of violations and to promote measures designed to protect human rights.
31. The Quick Response Desk (QRD) of the Special Procedures Division of OHCHR coordinates the sending of communications by all mandates. Information available to the Office is provided to relevant mandate-holders in order to ascertain whether they wish to take action on them. In the case of an affirmative response, a draft communication is prepared and circulated for approval. The Quick Response Desk also provides information on any previous action taken in relation to the case in question.
32. Mandate-holders are encouraged to send joint communications whenever this seems appropriate. Communications by thematic mandate-holders in relation to a State for which a country rapporteur exists shall be prepared in consultation with the latter. Where agreement between the thematic and country Special Procedures cannot be reached the advice of the Coordination Committee shall be sought.
33. OHCHR desk officers and relevant United Nations field offices should also be consulted, in the preparation of communications concerning the areas of their responsibility. In order to ensure necessary coordination they should also be provided with copies of any relevant communications which have been sent.
34. Each communication must be expressly authorized by the relevant mandate-holder(s). Communications usually take the form of a letter transmitted by the OHCHR to concerned Governments through diplomatic channels. This means that communications are sent to the Permanent Representative of the country concerned to the Office of the United Nations in Geneva. In the absence of such representation the letter shall be transmitted to the relevant Permanent Representative at United Nations Headquarters in New York, or to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the country or countries concerned, as agreed between OHCHR and the country concerned.
35. In communications sent to Governments, the source is normally kept confidential in order to protect against reprisals or retaliation. An information source may, however, request that its identity be revealed.
36. In light of information received in response from the Government concerned, or of further information from sources, the mandate-holder will determine how best to proceed. This might include the initiation of further inquiries, the elaboration of recommendations or observations to be published in the relevant report, or other appropriate steps designed to achieve the objectives of the mandate.
37. The text of all communications sent and responses received thereon is confidential until such time as they are published in relevant reports of mandate-holders or mandate-holders determine that the specific circumstances require action to be taken before that time. Periodic reports issued by the Special Procedures should reflect the communications sent by mandate-holders and annex the governments’ responses thereto. They may also contain observations of the mandate-holders in relation to the outcome of the dialogue with the Government. The names of alleged victims are normally reflected in the reports, although exceptions may be made in relation to children and other victims of violence in relation to whom publication of names would be problematic.
2. Criteria for taking action
38. Information submitted to the Special Procedures alleging violations should be in written, printed or electronic form and include full details of the sender's identity and address, and full details of the relevant incident or situation. Information may be sent by a person or a group of persons claiming to have suffered a human rights violation. NGOs and other groups or individuals claiming to have direct or reliable knowledge of human rights violations, substantiated by clear information, may also submit information so long as they are acting in good faith in accordance with the principles of human rights and the provisions of the UN Charter, free from politically motivated stands. Anonymous communications are not considered. Communications may not be exclusively based on reports disseminated by mass media.
39. Allegations should ideally contain clear and concise details regarding the name of individual victim(s) or other identifying information, such as date of birth, sex, passport number and place of residence; ethnic or religious group when appropriate; the name of any community or organization subject to alleged violations; information as to the circumstances, including available information as to the date and place of any incident(s); alleged perpetrators; suspected motives; contextual information; and any steps already taken at the national, regional or international level in relation to the case.
40. A decision to take action on a case or situation rests in the discretion of the mandate-holder. That discretion should be exercised in light of the mandate entrusted to him or her as well as the criteria laid out in the Code of Conduct. The criteria will generally relate to: the reliability of the source and the credibility of information received; the details provided; and the scope of the mandate.
41. Each mandate-holder may adopt criteria or guidelines governing the acceptance of information or the taking of action. A number of Special Procedures have developed standard requirements/questionnaires to facilitate the collection of relevant information. It is up to mandate-holders to seek additional information from the original source or from other appropriate sources in order to clarify the issues or verify the credibility of the information.
42. Unlike the requirements of communication procedures established under human rights treaties, communications may be sent by the mandate holder even if local remedies in the country concerned have not been exhausted. The Special Procedures are not quasi-judicial mechanisms. Rather, they are premised upon the need for rapid action, designed to protect victims and potential victims, and do not preclude in any way the taking of appropriate judicial measures at the national level.
3. Urgent Appeals
43. Urgent appeals are used to communicate information in cases where the alleged violations are time-sensitive in terms of involving loss of life, life-threatening situations or either imminent or ongoing damage of a very grave nature to victims that cannot be addressed in a timely manner by the procedure under letters of allegation. The intention is to ensure that the appropriate State authorities are informed as quickly as possible of the circumstances so that they can intervene to end or prevent a human rights violation.
44. Urgent appeals are addressed to concerned Governments through diplomatic channels, unless agreed otherwise between individual Governments and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
45. Urgent appeals also generally follow a standard format consisting of four parts: (i) a reference to the resolution creating the mandates concerned; (ii) a summary of the available facts, and when applicable an indication of previous action taken on the same case; (iii) an indication of the specific concerns of the mandate-holder in light of the provisions of relevant international instruments and case law; and (iv) a request to the Government to provide information on the substance of the allegations and to take urgent measures to prevent or stop the alleged violations. The content of the questions or requests addressed to the Government will vary significantly according to the situation in each case. Governments are generally requested to provide a substantive response within thirty days. In appropriate cases mandate-holders may decide to make such urgent appeals public by issuing press releases.
4. Letters of Allegation
46. Letters of allegation are used to communicate information about violations that are alleged to have already occurred and in situations where urgent appeals do not apply.
47. Letters of allegation generally follow a standard format consisting of four parts: (i) a reference to the resolution creating the mandate(s) concerned; (ii) a summary of the available facts, and when applicable an indication of previous action taken on the same case; (iii) an indication of the specific concerns of the mandate-holder in light of the provisions of relevant international instruments and case law; and (iv) a request to the Government to provide information on: (a) the substance of the allegations; (b) measures taken to investigate and punish alleged perpetrators; (c) compensation, protection, or assistance provided to the alleged victims; (d) legislative, administrative and other steps taken to avoid the recurrence of such violations in the future; and (e) other relevant information. The content of the specific questions or requests addressed to the Government may vary considerably according to the substance of the allegations.
48. Governments are usually requested to provide a substantive response to communication letters within two months. Some mandate-holders forward the substance of the replies received to the source for its comments.
5. Public and Press Statements
49. In appropriate situations, including those of grave concern or in which a Government has repeatedly failed to provide a substantive response to communications, a Special Procedure mandate-holder may issue a press statement, other public statement or hold a press conference, either individually or jointly with other mandate-holders.
50. In general, mandate holders should engage in a dialogue with the Government through the communications procedure before resorting to a press release or other public statement. When a mandate holder sends a communication with the intention of issuing a press release shortly thereafter, such intention could be indicated to the Government in the communication. Mandate holders should indicate fairly the responses provided by concerned States.
51. Standard practice is that press releases are shared with the Permanent mission sufficiently in advance. Press releases and statements are processed by the Communications Section of the OHCHR and posted on the OHCHR’s web-site.
C. Country visits
1. Definition and purpose
52. Country visits are an essential means to obtain direct and first-hand information on human rights violations. They allow for direct observation of the human rights situation and facilitate an intensive dialogue with all relevant state authorities, including those in the executive, legislative and judicial branches. They also allow for contact with and information gathering from victims, relatives of victims, witnesses, national human rights institutions, international and local NGOs and other members of civil society, the academic community, and officials of international agencies present in the country concerned.
53. Country visits generally last between one and two weeks but can be shorter or longer if the circumstances so require. The visit occurs at the invitation of a State. Its purpose is to assess the actual human rights situation in the country concerned, including an examination of the relevant institutional, legal, judicial, and administrative aspects and to make recommendations thereon in relation to issues that arise under the relevant mandate.
54. Country visits by mandate-holders provide an opportunity to enhance awareness at the country, regional and international levels of the specific problems under consideration. This is done, inter alia, through meetings, briefings, press coverage of the visit and dissemination of the report.
2. Invitations and requests for visits
55. A Government may take the initiative to invite a mandate-holder to visit the country. Alternatively a mandate-holder may solicit an invitation by communicating with the Government concerned, by discussions with diplomats of the country concerned, including especially the Permanent Representative to the United Nations Office in Geneva or at Headquarters, or by other appropriate means. The GA, the HRC, or the High Commissioner for Human Rights might also suggest or request that a visit be undertaken.
56. When a State does not respond to requests for an invitation to visit, it is appropriate for a mandate-holder to remind the Government concerned, to draw the attention of the Council to the outstanding request, and to take other appropriate measures designed to promote respect for human rights. An updated table of the status of requests for country visits is maintained on the website of the OHCHR.
57. Considerations which might lead a mandate-holder to request to visit a country include, inter alia, human rights developments at the national level (whether positive or negative), the availability of reliable information regarding human rights violations falling within the mandate, or a wish to pursue a particular thematic interest. Other factors which might be taken into account in determining which visits to undertake at any particular time might include considerations of geographical balance, the expected impact of the visit and the willingness of national actors to cooperate with the mandate-holder, the likelihood of follow-up on any recommendations made, the recent adoption by one or more treaty bodies of relevant concluding observations, the upcoming examination of the situation by one or more treaty bodies, recent or proposed visits by other Special Procedure mandate-holders, the list of countries scheduled for consideration under the Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism, follow up to the recommendations and conclusions of the UPR mechanism, and the priorities reflected in OHCHR’s country engagement strategy.
58. In 2004, the CHR on Human Rights strongly encouraged all States to extend a “standing invitation” to all thematic Special Procedures. By extending such an invitation States announce that they will automatically accept a request to visit by any of the Special Procedures. The extension of a standing invitation, and the overall cooperation afforded to Special Procedures, are appropriately taken into account by the GA in considering the “pledges and commitments” made by States seeking election to the HRC. Additionally, the Code of Conduct “urges all States to cooperate with, and assist, the special procedures in the performance of their tasks”.
59. Where appropriate country visits might be undertaken by several mandate-holders acting together, or by mandate-holders in conjunction with other representatives of the international community.
3. Preparation
60. Mandate-holders are expected to ensure that their visit is conducted in compliance with the terms of reference of their mandate. The minimum standards that Governments are expected to apply in the context of a country visit by mandate-holders are reflected in the ‘Terms of reference for fact-finding missions by Special Rapporteurs/Representatives’ which are reproduced in Annex 3 of this Manual. These standard terms of reference and possible additional guarantees related to the specificities of the particular situation or mandate need to be addressed and agreed upon between the mandate-holder and the Government in advance of the mission.
61. The preparation of country visits is carried out on the basis of close consultation and cooperation between the mandate-holder(s) and the Permanent Mission of the concerned State in Geneva, as well as with OHCHR, and other relevant United Nations entities.
62. The OHCHR will make the necessary arrangements to ensure that mandate-holders have the staff support needed to conduct their mission effectively. Mandate-holders are usually accompanied in their meetings by OHCHR staff.
63. In advance of their visit, mandate-holders are provided with a “country assessment” prepared by OHCHR, which is a briefing document on the situation in the country covering legislation, relevant policies and programmes, institutions, administrative practices, and case law, as well as specific information relating to alleged violations or particular situations of concern.
64. The actual agenda for a country visit is a matter to be determined by the mandate-holder.
65. Those parts of the programme involving meetings with public authorities and institutions are negotiated between the mandate-holder and the Government concerned, usually through their mission to the United Nations. These discussions usually cover the timing of the mission, the list of official meetings requested with relevant authorities, and the nomination of an official from the host country as focal point throughout the visit (usually from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Office of the Prime Minister or President). In this connection Governments must offer appropriate guarantees, preferably in writing, to ensure the protection of witnesses and the absence of all reprisals against any person cooperating with the mission in any way.
66. Those parts of the programme involving meetings with civil society are prepared by the mandate-holder with the support of the United Nations Country Team (UNCT) and OHCHR field presence as well as NGOs and national institutions. The details of this part of the programme may be shared with state authorities at the discretion of the mandate-holder. As specified in the Terms of Reference (see Annex 3.b, iii and iv of this Manual), the authorities commit to allow the mandate-holder to meet with NGOs and witnesses and to refrain from creating obstacles in that regard. Any person or group who cooperates with a Special Procedure is entitled to protection by the State from harassment, threats or any other form of intimidation or retaliation.
67. United Nations security regulations and assessments should be consulted in the preparatory stages of planning a country visit. Mandate holders shall have access to official security protection during their visit, but this shall be provided in ways which do not prejudice the privacy, confidentiality or freedom of movement that mandate-holders require to fulfill their mandates. This should be arranged in consultation with the OHCHR, and after an agreement between the host Government and the mandate holder, in light of an objective assessment of the security situation. Careful consideration should be given to offers for security measures that may have an impact on the conduct of the mission. Advice in this regard should be sought from the local United Nations official in charge of security questions. Should the host Government be unable to provide the requisite security, under rare and exceptional circumstances, the United Nations system may protect experts on mission by employing security service companies providing armed guards. In the alternative, armed United Nations security officers may accompany a mandate-holder. The United Nations Security Coordinator must authorize such protection well in advance of the mission.
68. In terms of logistics, OHCHR works closely with the United Nations Resident Coordinator or Representative in the country. Where specific agencies have a major role in relation to the human rights situation, they are also consulted and may be requested to provide support. In addition, mandate-holders sometimes request one or more NGOs to coordinate some or all meetings with NGOs and individuals.
69. The necessary visas for the countries to be visited are to be obtained by mandate-holders, usually in their places of residence. When needed, the OHCHR shall cooperate with the appropriate authorities to facilitate the obtaining of a visa for the mandate-holder. Visa fees incurred will be reimbursed as part of the final settlement of travel expenses. In cases in which mandate-holders propose to undertake a mission in their countries of origin or residence, visas are not required. In such cases, they should simply notify their Government of nationality or residence.
70. In most cases mandate-holders will issue a brief media advisory, perhaps one week before the start of the mission, through the Communications Section of OHCHR, providing essential information on the mandate, the mandate-holder and the objectives of the visit. This media advisory should be made available on the website of the OHCHR and publicized in the country to be visited.
4. Conduct of the visit
71. At the beginning and at the end of their visit, mandate-holders usually organize a meeting with the Government authority in charge of the visit, which is normally the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. During the initial briefing the Government should be informed about the purpose of the visit, the most significant issues to be addressed and the anticipated approach of the mandate-holder. During the departure briefing, the mandate-holder shares with the Government his or her preliminary findings and recommendations. The process for preparing the report, as well as the means of follow-up, may also be discussed.
72. At the end of a visit, mandate-holders will generally organize a press conference during which they will make a press statement and share their preliminary conclusions. They may also indicate fairly any responses received from the concerned State in the meantime. The organization of the press conference is facilitated by the UNCTs.
73. When conducting interviews with victims and witnesses of human rights violations mandate-holders will be guided by principles of objectivity, respect, confidentiality, verifiability, discretion, transparency, impartiality, and even‑handedness. They should explain the mandate and avoid raising unrealistic expectations. They should also assess the reliability of the information and of the person(s) providing the information. Interviews should always be private and confidential. The premises of the United Nations should be used for interviews where available and appropriate. Government authorities, military or civilian, should not be present during interviews with victims, NGOs, or other non-governmental entities. Testimonies should not be reproduced in such a way that they can be attributed and real names should not be cited in the report without the explicit consent of the person concerned. Mandate-holders should preserve the confidentiality of sources of testimonies if their divulgation or publication could cause harm to individuals involved.
5. Reporting on the visit
74. The mission report prepared by a mandate-holder will generally contain details of the itinerary and of the principal meetings, an analysis of the situation, and a set of conclusions and recommendations directed towards the Government and other relevant actors. The draft report is first submitted to the Government to correct any misunderstandings or factual inaccuracies. Ideally, six weeks should be allowed for Government comments to be taken into account, but in any case no less than four weeks unless specifically agreed with the Government concerned. Mandate-holders might also opt to solicit comments on the draft report from UNCTs and other appropriate sources. The final reports are generally published as a separate document but might also be included as a part of a general report by the mandate-holder. Comments by the Government concerned on the substance of the report should be annexed to the report, in accordance with applicable United Nations documentation rules. They may, upon request of the Government concerned, also be issued as an official document.
D. Other activities
1. Thematic studies
75. In addition to any other reports, mandate-holders may opt to devote a separate report to a particular topic of relevance to the mandate. Such studies may be initiated by the mandate-holder or undertaken pursuant to a specific request by relevant bodies. The practical arrangements in relation to the drafting and publication of these reports will be determined in consultation with OHCHR.
76. Such studies should be thoroughly researched and where appropriate take account of replies to questionnaires or other requests for information transmitted to governments, United Nations agencies, NGOs, treaty bodies, regional organizations, other experts, or partners.
2. Participation in seminars and conferences
77. Mandate-holders are frequently invited in their official capacity to participate in conferences, seminars and other events. OHCHR staff should be kept informed about such activities and should, both as a matter of courtesy and for reasons of transparency, inform the state concerned of the visit.
3. Awareness raising
In order to alert the United Nations organs and agencies and the international community to the need to address specific situations and issues, mandate holders are expected to play a proactive role
78. Dissemination of information is an important element in relation to the conduct of most Special Procedures, but the precise nature of measures taken will vary from one mandate to another. All mandate-holders have a webpage on the OHCHR website that provides information about the mandate as well as links to their reports and other relevant documents. The main Special Procedures website provides information on the system of special procedures, developments at the HRC, and features on information and communication tools. In addition, the Coordination Committee webpage provides information on its activities and relevant information that concerns all mandate holders.
79. Four times each year the OHCHR publishes the “Special Procedures Bulletin”, and annually, the “Facts and Figures”, aimed at providing a general overview of the main activities of Special Procedures.
80. The Communications Section of OHCHR issues press releases and responds to questions in relation to the activities and reports of mandate-holders. Special procedures also issue press releases in honor of international days and to announce or draw attention to important research initiatives and other themes. In addition, the Special Procedure Division, and other Divisions, of OHCHR undertake appropriate promotional and informational activities to make the work of the Special Procedures better known and understood.
E. Relations with Non-State actors
81. International law focuses upon the legal responsibility of the State for violations of human rights committed on its territory or within its jurisdiction, whether by State agents, other concerned authorities or by non-State actors ranging from national liberation movements to private corporations or other actors. In appropriate circumstances, however, non-State actors can also be held to account for human rights violations and may be relevant interlocutors in the quest to restore respect for human rights and to establish accountability for violations. It might thus be appropriate for mandate-holders to engage in a dialogue with such actors.
82. In a State in which a peace process is under way, a cease-fire has been proclaimed by all relevant parties, or where territory is de-facto controlled by a non-State actor or de-facto authority, interaction between the mandate-holder and representatives of the non-State actor or de-facto authority might take place within the country concerned. The context of such meetings and the conditions under which they are held should seek to ensure that the involvement of the mandate-holder is not understood as an endorsement of any particular claim made by the non-State actor or de-facto authority as to representativity, legitimacy, or other matters. In other contexts, such contacts should preferably be organized outside the territory of the State concerned and should avoid the appearance of a clandestine meeting. Practice indicates that many mandate-holders have made recommendations addressed to non-State actors or de-facto authority and that some have sent communications to such actors.
83. In addition, mandate-holders also communicate regularly with a range of other non-State actors including international organizations such as the World Bank, business entities, and other entities such as United Nations mandated peacekeeping forces.
F. Reporting on activities and interaction with Governments
84. Mandate-holders report on their activities on a regular basis to the relevant United Nations bodies, and particularly the HRC and the GA. With regard to the recommendations contained in their reports, mandate holders should ensure that they recommendations do not exceed their mandate or the mandate of the HRC. Recommendations may also serve to bring to the attention of the Council any suggestions of the mandate holder which will enhance his or her capacity to fulfill the mandate.
85. The relevant deadlines and word limits are determined by applicable United Nations documentation rules in light of the relevant legislative mandates. This will be generally 10 weeks before any given session of a United Nations body. Advanced edited versions of reports are posted on the OHCHR’s web-site as soon as they are available.
86. An inter-active dialogue constitutes an important element in the presentation of reports by mandate-holders. Mandate holders present their reports to the HRC, and in some cases to the GA, and States are given the opportunity to respond to the contents of the reports and to pose questions to the mandate holders. Such dialogues are considered to be an integral part of cooperation between mandate holders and States.
87. Mandate-holders also maintain contact with relevant Governments through meetings and consultations in Geneva, New York, or elsewhere. Such meetings might focus on requests for visits, follow-up to visits, individual cases, or any other question related to the mandate. Such contacts are designed to facilitate smooth and fruitful cooperation between Governments and mandate-holders.
رفقا بالسيرفر يا بت ..
إذا بكري طردك أنا ماعندي لزوم.
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/index.htm
لاضافة المصدر
(عدل بواسطة محمد على طه الملك on 10-11-2011, 04:32 PM)
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
|
| العنوان |
الكاتب |
Date |
| تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 08:42 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 09:28 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 09:35 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد إبراهيم علي | 09-30-11, 09:42 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد إبراهيم علي | 09-30-11, 09:46 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد إبراهيم علي | 09-30-11, 09:54 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:19 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 10:05 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:21 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:22 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:24 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:25 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 10:27 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | قيقراوي | 09-30-11, 11:10 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 10:38 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 11:40 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 11:43 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 11:50 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على حسن | 09-30-11, 12:00 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 09-30-11, 01:43 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | AMNA MUKHTAR | 09-30-11, 01:59 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | nadus2000 | 09-30-11, 04:06 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | احمد محمد بشير | 09-30-11, 04:20 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 05:59 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 07:12 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | ود الباوقة | 09-30-11, 07:18 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 09-30-11, 08:33 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-01-11, 08:08 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-01-11, 10:40 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-01-11, 09:14 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-01-11, 11:10 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-02-11, 07:10 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-02-11, 01:21 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-02-11, 07:16 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-02-11, 02:43 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-02-11, 02:51 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-02-11, 04:27 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-02-11, 04:29 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-02-11, 05:58 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-02-11, 06:08 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-02-11, 06:48 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | Siham Elmugammar | 10-02-11, 09:32 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-02-11, 09:48 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-02-11, 11:27 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-03-11, 06:05 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-03-11, 06:08 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-04-11, 02:35 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-04-11, 09:08 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-04-11, 10:00 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-04-11, 01:09 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-05-11, 02:25 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-05-11, 02:28 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-05-11, 03:56 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-05-11, 06:51 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-05-11, 03:02 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-05-11, 09:05 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-06-11, 06:14 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-06-11, 07:04 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-07-11, 03:56 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-07-11, 08:48 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الطيب شيقوق | 10-07-11, 09:26 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-08-11, 00:42 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-08-11, 03:05 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-08-11, 05:57 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-08-11, 06:31 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-09-11, 01:16 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-09-11, 03:05 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-09-11, 04:29 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-09-11, 07:01 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-09-11, 03:12 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-09-11, 04:28 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-10-11, 02:31 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-10-11, 12:21 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-10-11, 04:29 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-11-11, 10:00 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-11-11, 04:18 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-11-11, 04:24 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-11-11, 05:27 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-11-11, 06:32 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-11-11, 08:48 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-11-11, 11:31 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | ايهاب اسماعيل | 10-12-11, 01:21 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-12-11, 03:59 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-12-11, 04:41 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-12-11, 04:59 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-12-11, 06:28 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-12-11, 06:32 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-12-11, 11:44 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-12-11, 03:53 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-12-11, 12:21 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-12-11, 06:36 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-13-11, 10:37 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-13-11, 12:05 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-13-11, 12:24 PM |
 Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-13-11, 12:52 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | محمد على طه الملك | 10-13-11, 01:30 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | دينا خالد | 10-13-11, 07:11 PM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | نادر الفضلى | 10-14-11, 03:47 AM |
| Re: تضارب مانشيتات صحف الخرطوم اليوم حول (خبير حقوق الانسان) !!! | الشفيع وراق عبد الرحمن | 10-14-11, 12:37 PM |
|
| |
محمد على طه الملك
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست