|
Re: تلخيص: From war to peace and reconciliation in Darfur منتدى عماد الأمين (Re: Elmuiz Haggaz)
|
The Judia versus the Shartay court: As I mentioned before, the Shartay runs a court that is endorsed by the state. The Shartay court deals with intermediary conflicts and is subordinate to government courts. The Judia then occupies the lower level of jurisprudence and is confined to lower level of crimes that may not require intervention by the Shartay court. In contrast to the Judia, the Shartay court mimics its superior government courts. It is informed by a modern ethos, literate and with permanent members. It is also punitive and dependent on external tools like bailiffs, police and prisons to enforce its verdicts. Its sessions are formally planned and held in modern buildings, ie.mud rooms.
The Judia contrasts sharply with the above. It is grass root-based, spontaneous, with an open jury and focussed on reconciliation. Its meetings are convened in any suitable place, like a shade of a tree, and relies on the good will of the parties involved to enforce its rulings (see Figure 1 and 2).
![Untitled5.jpg Hosting at Sudaneseonline.com](http://www.sudaneseonline.com/uploadpic10/Jan/Untitled5.jpg)
![Untitled6.jpg Hosting at Sudaneseonline.com](http://www.sudaneseonline.com/uploadpic10/Jan/Untitled6.jpg)
|
|
![Edit](https://sudaneseonline.com/db/icon_edit.gif)
|
|
|
|