حملة صوت الشتات من أجل مشاركة المغتربين والمهاجرين فى الانتخابات تدشن مرحلة جديدة

Quote: The state should not be seen to penalise its adversaries by denying them nationality of their own homeland, a condition that renders them stateless by their own state. This has at times been a policy of certain regimes and it should not be allowed to continue to be. The first military regime was known to do that. You can find yourself being the odd one out n the whole of you extended family or clan who is discriminately disfavoured. One can claim to personally be witness to that outrageous behaviour by the state where government disfavour of the opposition is personalised, where the state’s animosity to its foes bends the rules against them to which one can literarily testify. Can there be anything more bizarre, indeed outrageous behaviour than that by any state? It is obvious that most of the potentially stateless would be the Southern Sudanese. Those northern Sudanese who have no IDs on them can only be those who had to flee the country in the face of some atrocity. The southern Sudanese are very unlikely to vote for a MONDOKORO (northern) President. Those who have had to flee the country may just as well not vote to bring back the existing president.