|
|
 Re: حول ورقتي رئيس و نائب رئيس الحركة الشعبية (Re: ناصف بشير الأمين)
|
First of all, to solve any problem, one must address the problem from its root causes. So the Sudanese genocidal wars causes need to be address from its roots causes. And second, when solving any problem, first it must be defined and diagnosed correctly. Miss-defining and misdiagnosing the problem does not lead to a solution but it create more compounded problems or accumulated problems. problems on top of the problem. This is the problem with those who wanted to solve the Sudanese genocidal wars and economic crisis
Now, let us take the issue of the SPLA/M ( Sudanese people Liberation Army/Movement ). The problem is that the vision of the SPLA/M's which is the New Sudan Vision has been misdefined, and there is a great attempt to modify its meaning. Propoganda and misinformation are taking a great toll on the vision. And this great effort has been exerted by the enemies and those who opposed the New Sudan Vision. These enemies are within and outside the movement.
There is a great deal of deception and grand conspiracy to destroy the vision of the SPLA/M and turned the movement into a toothless, politically meaningless party. We are aware of this strategy.
For example, how is the removal of the top corrupted SPLA/M leaders turned into a coup de tat ؟ Removal of leaders who were sabotaging the movement from within is not a coup de tat.
What was the exceptional conference that was held in Kauda this year about؟ why are some people the former leader and secretary general still being addressed as leaders؟ When it's well known as they've been removed from their positions and have no army on the ground. Where does this idea of the movement being split into two factions came from ؟ one faction led by Abdel-Aziz Al-Hilu and the other by Malik Agar. This tactic in itself is a part of the conspiracy against the movement
( SPLA/M ).
SPLA/M and Other opposition forces
All opposition political parties in North Sudan other than SPLA/M are have hidden agenda other than the New Sudan Vision. The objective is to sabotage the New Sudan Vision and weaken or destroy the movement to point of non-existence. The North Sudanese oppositional parties have intention of taking the SPLA/M to make a sandwich with it and obsecure the vision of the movement. For example , they started out forming a loose alliance with the SPLA/M such as in Sudan call group with their road map, broad oppoition Forces, SRF and so forth. The objective of the loose fake alliances is to contain SPLA/M and reduce it to a level of regional or tribal level and give it an ethnic identity as saw it happened with the movement. This is conspiratorial strategy to destroy SPLA/M as it has been seen manifested in the Soft landing conspiracy plot and the so called road map. The conspiracy is being push by the AU, troika, and Arab league, and dictated by the islamic, theocratic, oppressive, regime in Khartoum.
New Sudan Vision and Self Determination Case
The Self-determination is not the first point to be negotiated or has been disagreed on. The protocols that are supposed to be negotiated or agreed up on and have them implemented in order to have the New Sudan realized or achieved supposed to be the first to be negotiated. Self-determination is last point or case to be discussed. And its manifestation depends on the out come of the New Sudan Vision. Points of disagreement are not just only humanitarian access or self-determination. The main problem is how the problem itself has been defined. How one define the problem determined its solution or lack of solution.
Creating confusing by political newspeaks such as Two-areas. ceasation of hostilities ( COH ) , how is it different than cease Fire, or truce. Self-determination and referendum. The right of the vote, who's entitle to vote in the referendum؟ How is self determination is define؟ in what order the self-determination and the New Sudan Vision are supposed to come in؟ which one comes first؟ and the how the process is supposed to be executed. What is the different between a liberation movement and a political party؟ How one is administrated؟ SPLA/M leaders should review these relevant questions before engaging in any negotiation process.
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست