|
|
 المحكمه العليا الأمريكيه تفتى بعدم شرعيه إنشاء محاكم عسكرية لمعتقلى غوانتانامو
|
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in creating military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-terror policies.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion, which said the proposed trials were illegal under U.S. law and the Geneva Convention
The case, one of the most significant involving presidential war powers cases since World War II, was brought by Guantanamo prisoner Salim Ahmed Hamdan, who was a driver for Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush established special war crimes tribunals for trying prisoners held at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
Of about 450 prisoners at Guantanamo, only Hamdan and nine others face charges before a tribunal. Human rights groups have criticized the tribunals, formally called military commissions, for being fundamentally unfair.
Hamdan’s lawyers had challenged Bush’s power to create the tribunals and said he is covered by the Geneva Convention, and therefore rules governing U.S. courts-martial should be applied.
Key ruling
The ruling was eagerly awaited by Bush administration officials, who want to bring charges against more prisoners, and by groups like Human Rights Watch, which has called on Bush to close Guantanamo.
The ruling only addressed the military tribunals, not broader issues such as whether the base should be closed.
At a news conference in Vienna last week, Bush said he was awaiting the Supreme Court’s ruling before deciding the proper forum to try Guantanamo prisoners.
In its other rulings on Bush’s policies in the war on terrorism, the Supreme Court issued a pair of decisions two years ago that placed limits on the president’s powers and allowed Guantanamo prisoners to bring lawsuits in U.S. courts.
The ruling involved eight of the nine court members. Chief Justice John Roberts, who was appointed by Bush, had removed himself because he previously was on a U.S. appeals court panel that ruled for the Bush administration in the Hamdan case.
This report will be updated as information becomes available.
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
Frankly
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست