|
|
 Re: رد على مدونة نعيم مدحت الشوربجي «أعداء مص� (Re: زهير ابو الزهراء)
|
نص المقال بلغته الانجليزية
Analysis of Positions on Egyptian "Invasion" in Sudanese LandsHamad's writings position Egyptian actions as a multifaceted "invasion" (غزو)—not literal military occupation but a hybrid interference blending historical imperialism with modern geopolitics. He substantiates claims with references to leaked documents, media reports, and historical analogies, urging Sudanese civil society to resist. Below is a structured breakdown:1. Historical Framing: Echoes of 19th-Century ConquestHamad invokes the Turco-Egyptian invasion of 1820 under Muhammad Ali Pasha, which annexed Sudan for gold, slaves, and Nile control, leading to the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1899–1956). He argues current policies revive this legacy: Egypt views Sudan as an "extension" (امتداد جيوسياسي) rather than a sovereign equal.
Critique: This framing politicizes history to delegitimize Egypt's mediation claims. Hamad warns that, like the condominium era, modern involvement risks partitioning Sudan (e.g., supporting "Darfur Sages Council" initiatives that could detach regions).
Evidence Used: Allusions to unresolved border issues, such as Egypt's 2016 handover of Tiran and Sanafir islands to Saudi Arabia without Sudanese input, implying disregard for Nile-adjacent territories.
2. Military Interference: Direct Support as "Invasion"Position: Egypt's arms shipments via Port Sudan and intelligence coordination with SAF generals constitute an "occupation" of Sudanese decision-making. Hamad cites "Sudan Tribune" leaks showing Egyptian weapons bolstering SAF against RSF, framing this as enabling Egyptian bases (e.g., proposed facility in Wadi Halfa for "water protection").
Critique: This support prolongs the war, prioritizing Egyptian security (e.g., countering Ethiopian influence) over Sudanese lives. Hamad calls it "بنيوي" (structural) involvement, not aid.
Implications: Risks Sudanese territorial integrity, as Egyptian presence could evolve into de facto control over northern borders.
3. Political and Diplomatic Meddling: Undermining SovereigntyPosition: Egypt pressures Sudan on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), protesting UN-filed Sudanese-Ethiopian talks and pushing unilateral deals. Hamad accuses Cairo of excluding civilians (e.g., labeling resistance committees "terrorists") and funding pro-SAF Islamists via the "Cairo Initiative."
Critique: This is "ahتواء" (containment)—supporting military rule to suppress democracy, fearing a Sudanese model could inspire Egyptian unrest. Arrests of 17 Sudanese activists in Cairo (June 2025) exemplify repressive "invasion" of diaspora spaces.
Evidence Used: Reports of $3.7 million from Egypt's National Bank to pro-military parties; Egyptian media (e.g., Al-Mohwar channel) discrediting revolutionaries.
4. Economic and Media Dimensions: Soft InvasionPosition: Economic aid (e.g., reconstruction loans) is conditional, tied to anti-RSF alignment. Media campaigns by Egyptian outlets promote SAF legitimacy while demonizing opponents.
Critique: This creates dependency, turning Sudan into a "buffer zone" for Red Sea security and Nile rights. Hamad sees it as neocolonialism, contrasting with Egypt's public unity rhetoric.
Implications: Erodes Sudanese agency, fostering division (e.g., northern alignment with Egypt vs. southern autonomy).
Aspect of "Invasion"
Hamad's Key Claim
Substantiation
Broader Implication for Sudan
Military
Arms and bases as proxy occupation
Leaked docs on Port Sudan shipments; Wadi Halfa base plans
Prolongs war, risks northern annexation
Political
Pressure on GERD; exclusion of civilians
UN protests; Cairo Initiative funding
Undermines democracy, enables partition
Economic
Conditional aid for alignment
$3.7M to pro-SAF groups; reconstruction tied to military
Creates dependency, stifles self-determination
Media/Repressive
Propaganda and activist arrests
Egyptian channels' campaigns; June 2025 detentions
Silences dissent, invades diaspora spaces
5. Overall Tone and Rhetorical StrategyTone: Urgent and accusatory, blending outrage with analytical restraint. Hamad uses ####phors (e.g., Sudan as "geopolitical extension") to evoke historical trauma without descending into xenophobia.
Strategy: Appeals to Sudanese nationalists, calling for international exposure of Egypt's role and boycotts of its initiatives. He contrasts Egypt's actions with "principles" (مبادئ), positioning civilians as vanguards against a "triangle" of military, Islamists, and Cairo.
Strengths: Evidence-based (leaks, reports), timely amid 2025 escalations; promotes unity.
Limitations: Relies on unverified leaks; risks oversimplifying Egypt's motives (e.g., genuine security fears from GERD). No explicit solutions beyond resistance.
Conclusion: Implications for Sudanese DiscourseHamad's writings portray Egyptian "invasion" as a existential threat to Sudanese unity, urging a paradigm shift from victimhood to agency. In the context of Sudan's 2023–present civil war (with over 150,000 deaths and 14 million displaced), his analysis highlights how external powers exacerbate fragmentation. By linking past conquests to present interferences, Hamad contributes to a burgeoning Sudanese narrative of anti-imperial resistance, influencing civil society and media. For deeper reading, his articles on Al-Rakoba exemplify accessible, impactful journalism amid crisis. If specific texts or further historical ties are needed, additional Sudanese archives (e.g., Sudanile) could yield more.
| |
  
|
|
|
|
زهير ابو الزهراء
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست