هل المرأة إنسان؟ عنوان دورة تدريب يثير جدلا واسعا في السعودية

صاحب الندوة يفترض الجهل عند العرب، ولديه كل الحق في ذلك، اول ما قريت عنوان البوست

تذكرت كم من المرات مرت علي قصة التصويت الذي تم في المجمع الكنسي في غابر الايام، التصويت

كان بنفس عنوان الدورة، بل ذهبوا الى التصويت ان كانت المرأة تمتلك روحا ام لا.

المهم، قولقه خفيفة كده وجبت القصة، المهم، حقيقة لا ادري ان كان معد الدورة سيذهب في اتجاه الكنيسة

ام يعارضة (بالطبع سيعارضه) لكن السؤال، لييه المتخلف دا بسأل سؤال تمت الاجابة عليه بواسطة سيدنا محمد

والمجمع الكنسي معا وبفارق 100 سنة، يعني لييه زول يعيد سؤال تمت الاجابة عليه قبل 1400 سنة عند المسلمين

و 1500 سنة عند المسيحيين؟؟

ياخي لو في زول رايح ليهو تعريف كلمة "تفكير متخلف" يجي يشوف موضوع البوست دا

Quote: In Jesus’ day, the Romans occupied Israel. They treated women as inferior, so Jesus lived in a climate of hostility and prejudice against women. His attitude, treatment and teaching about women was therefore revolutionary for its time and won him enemies as well as friends. However, the Christian Church has not always followed its founder’s example. The writing of St. Paul in the New Testament has caused much controversy and debate – for example, where he states women should not be heard in Church and the husband is head of the household. Some ‘interesting’ but nowadays unacceptable remarks have been made about women, by famous churchmen in history. In 584 AD. the Church Council of Macon, France debated ‘Are women human؟’ The notion was carried by 32 to 31 votes. Many Christians at the time thought that women had no souls and were less holy than men. And from some other eminent churchmen: ‘Any woman who acts in such a way that she cannot give birth to as many children as she is capable of, makes herself guilty of that many murders.’ (St Augustine) ‘Women should remain at home, sit still, keep house and bear and bring up children… If a woman grows weary and at last dies from child bearing, it matters not. Let her die from bearing – she is there to do it.’ (Martin Luther)