|
|
 Re: هل ما حدث بدارفور ابادة يا محمد سليمان وماذا عن مليوني جنوبي (Re: الامين موسى البشاري)
|
ود أب البشاري المريه أم شعفيط ده واقعه من وين
السيدة تراجي مصطفي
أولا أنا لست ابن الناظر علي الغالي وليس بقريب الأخ الحبيب دكتور عبدالحمن الغالي الأنصاري ولست هباني مع اعتزازي بهم ، عشان أوريك أعطيني عشرة شيكل اسرائيلي
أنا أكاديمي وأنهي الآن الدكتوراة الثانيه وتاريخ المناقشة 12/28/2013 وأنت مدعوه ، المجال الاستثمار والطاقة بالشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا
معقول زرتي معرض الهلوكوست باسرائيل وتجهلين الهلوكوست بتاع عيال دارفور ، أفو ما وقعت غلط ، المثل البقول عميان ومسكوه عصا ، كل نباحك عن دارفور وفتح سفارة باسم دارفور باسرائيل وما عارفه بتتحدثي عن أيه
أولا : هذا هو دليل والرابط لمحكمه جرائم الحرب وهو يمثل عريضة الاتهام بأن قبائل الفور والزغاوة والمساليت هي القبائل التي تعرضت للابادة ،
http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/A2BA9996-...OTPST20080714ENG.pdf
Good afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen.
I have submitted to the Judges an application for the issuance of an arrest warrant
against Omar Hassan Ahmad AL BASHIR, for genocide, crimes against humanity
and war crimes. The Pre-Trial Chamber 3, consisting of Judges Akua Kuenyehia of
Ghana, Sylvia Steiner of Brazil and Anita Uand#353;acka of Latvia, will now assess the
evidence. They will decide. I am just requesting an arrest warrant, they will decide
whether or not to grant one. They can dismiss my application, agree totally or
partially. They can ask me for more evidence. Normally it take 2 or 3 months, but this
a complex case.
Let me present the case; the second case of this Office in relation to the situation in
Darfur.
AL BASHIR bears criminal responsibility:
• for genocide under Article 6 (a), killing members of the Fur, Masalit and
Zaghawa ethnic groups, (b) causing serious mental harm, and (c) deliberately
inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in part;
• for crimes against humanity, including acts of (a) murder, (b) extermination,
(d) forcible transfer of the population, (f) torture and (g) rapes; and
• war crimes for intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population
and pillaging.
The jurisdiction of the Court comes from a referral by the UN Security Council.
Security Council Resolution 1593 of March 2005 stated that justice and accountability
are critical to achieve lasting peace and security in Darfur. A month ago, in a
Presidential statement, the UN Security Council unanimously reiterated the
importance of Resolution 1593.
In accordance with the principle of “complementarity”, the Prosecution has assessed
the existence of national proceedings in the Sudan in relation to those crimes. There
are none. The only officers Al BASHIR really wanted investigated were those who
refused to comply with his orders to commit genocide.
Ladies and gentlemen,
In Darfur, AL BASHIR promoted the idea of a polarization between tribes aligned
with him, whom he called “Arabs”, and the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa, whom he
called “Zurgas” or “Africans”. The image is only one of many used by AL BASHIR
to disguise crimes. Both, victims and perpetrators are in fact “Africans” and speak
“Arabic”.
AL BASHIR assessed that the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa constituted a threat to his
power: members of the three groups engaged in armed rebellions. AL BASHIR’s
motive was control of power. His pretext was a ‘counterinsurgency’. His intent was
genocide.
In March 2003, AL BASHIR decided and set out to destroy in part the target groups,
on account of their ethnicity. He publicly instructed the army to quell the rebellion
and not to bring back any prisoners or wounded.
2 / 5There is an armed conflict in Darfur. The Government of Sudan is engaged in a
military campaign against two rebel armed movements. Both rebel groups mainly
recruit from the target groups. The Government has the right to use force to control
its territory, but it cannot use genocide as a means to do so. Since 2003, AL
BASHIR’s forces purposefully targeted civilians who were not participants in any
conflict.
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست