Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK

Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK


12-12-2018, 07:32 PM


  » http://sudaneseonline.com/cgi-bin/esdb/2bb.cgi?seq=msg&board=15&msg=1544643166&rn=0


Post: #1
Title: Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK
Author: سعيد محمد عدنان
Date: 12-12-2018, 07:32 PM

07:32 PM December, 12 2018

Sudanese Online
سعيد محمد عدنان-UK
My Library
Short URL

London – UK
The Conservatives wriggle at the dawning of the real meaning of the farce of Brexit is shameful.
It is understandable that one can erroneously make a naïve choice, easily, no shame in that; we all err. But to realise the folly masking the gravity of that error and still err, is a sharp twist into treason.
A normal referendum to consult the people of Britain whether to leave or remain in the European Union was cast on a depth-less enlightenment of what it entails. Voters were made to see the benefit of a wider trade opportunity, a chance to halt free movement and a grip on sovereignty, old style. But they were looking at a masked reality of how vulnerable the nation is prior to healing its division wounds and reunion tasks. After lengthy and bloody civil wars and rescue from a cliff edge of a Northern Ireland crisis with the currents it induces from intertwining American interests, the Good Friday agreement was thankfully just brokered in such intertwining wills to avert a disaster.
Any will in reshaping The UK politics should refrain from unity jeopardy, especially for Northern Island where a serious division of the populace of the United Kingdom may endanger the whole country. To conceal the imperfection of achieving the goal of free international trade while enjoying the privileges of the European Union, they costly negotiated blotched deals in cherry-picking from the basic Four Freedoms of the European Union, giving a Backstop on the unity of the country as an indemnity to trust the success of digitally impervious border, where they were ready to stake the country’s sovereignty to the detriment of the European Union pleasure, thus defeating the matter of sovereignty the started the Brexit for. That can only be gulp it if that digital control on borders is solidly proven and internationally accepted; yet still the people of Britain have to endorse it first. Unity of the Kingdom cannot be rouletted in politics.
Now they are resisting the people’s vote as a treason to the peoples will endorsed in the last referendum. If I may make a plea, if the people at the first referendum knew that they had to place the unity of the UK in peril for cherry-picking in a Brexit deal, they would be committing treason as the Sovereign had not consented to it. To avert that scenario, it is wiser to accept that those who voted to leave did not have that in mind and therefore to re-run an educated referendum as the result of the first one is obviously flawed from the understanding shown by its peers.

Post: #2
Title: Re: Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan �
Author: Saeed Mohammed Adnan
Date: 12-12-2018, 08:20 PM
Parent: #1

Please consider this a corrected script of the above essay with correction set in bold letters
The Conservatives wriggle at the dawning of the real meaning of the farce of Brexit is shameful. It is understandable that one can erroneously make a naïve choice, easily, no shame in that; we all err. But to realise the folly masking the gravity of that error and still err, is a sharp twist into treason. A normal referendum to consult the people of Britain whether to leave or remain in the European Union was cast on a depth-less enlightenment of what it entails. Voters were made to see the benefit of a wider trade opportunity, a chance to halt free movement and a grip on sovereignty, old style. But they were looking at a masked reality of how vulnerable the nation is prior to healing its division wounds and reunion tasks. After lengthy and bloody civil wars and rescue from a cliff edge of a Northern Ireland crisis with the currents it induces from intertwining American interests, the Good Friday agreement was thankfully just brokered in such intertwining wills to avert a disaster.
Any will intended to shape The UK politics should refrain from unity jeopardy, especially for Northern Ireland where a serious division of the populace of the United Kingdom may endanger the whole country.
To conceal the imperfection of achieving the goal of free international trade while enjoying the privileges of the European Union, the Brexiteers costly negotiated blotched deals in cherry-picking from the basic Four Freedoms of the European Union, giving a Backstop on the unity of the country as an indemnity to trust the success of digitally impervious border, where they were ready to stake the country’s sovereignty to the detriment of the European Union pleasure, thus defeating the matter of sovereignty theystarted the Brexit for. That can only be gulped if that digital control on borders is solidly proven and internationally accepted, as controlling a boarder has to first have a border set, which is the danger to the unity of the country; yet still the people of Britain have to endorse it first. Unity of the Kingdom cannot be rouletted in politics.Now they are resisting the people’s vote as a treason to the peoples will endorsed in the last referendum. If I may make a plea, if the people at the first referendum knew that they had to place the unity of the UK in peril for cherry-picking in a Brexit deal, they would be committing treason as the Sovereign had not consented to it. To avert that scenario, it is wiser to accept that those who voted to leave did not have that in mind and therefore to re-run an educated referendum as the result of the first one is obviously flawed from the misinformationshown by its peers