منتديات سودانيزاونلاين    مكتبة الفساد    ابحث    اخبار و بيانات    مواضيع توثيقية    منبر الشعبية    اراء حرة و مقالات   
News and Press Releases    اتصل بنا    Articles and Views    English Forum    ناس الزقازيق   
Welcome Guest [Login]
Your last visit: 01-23-2019, 04:19 PM Home

Articles and ViewsIs Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK

Printable Version   Forward   Threaded View « Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Jump to newest reply in thread »

Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK

12-12-2018, 07:32 PM
سعيد محمد عدنان
<aسعيد محمد عدنان
Registered: 02-28-2014
Total Posts: 76






Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK

    07:32 PM December, 12 2018

    Sudanese Online
    سعيد محمد عدنان-UK
    My Library
    Short URL

    London – UK
    The Conservatives wriggle at the dawning of the real meaning of the farce of Brexit is shameful.
    It is understandable that one can erroneously make a naïve choice, easily, no shame in that; we all err. But to realise the folly masking the gravity of that error and still err, is a sharp twist into treason.
    A normal referendum to consult the people of Britain whether to leave or remain in the European Union was cast on a depth-less enlightenment of what it entails. Voters were made to see the benefit of a wider trade opportunity, a chance to halt free movement and a grip on sovereignty, old style. But they were looking at a masked reality of how vulnerable the nation is prior to healing its division wounds and reunion tasks. After lengthy and bloody civil wars and rescue from a cliff edge of a Northern Ireland crisis with the currents it induces from intertwining American interests, the Good Friday agreement was thankfully just brokered in such intertwining wills to avert a disaster.
    Any will in reshaping The UK politics should refrain from unity jeopardy, especially for Northern Island where a serious division of the populace of the United Kingdom may endanger the whole country. To conceal the imperfection of achieving the goal of free international trade while enjoying the privileges of the European Union, they costly negotiated blotched deals in cherry-picking from the basic Four Freedoms of the European Union, giving a Backstop on the unity of the country as an indemnity to trust the success of digitally impervious border, where they were ready to stake the country’s sovereignty to the detriment of the European Union pleasure, thus defeating the matter of sovereignty the started the Brexit for. That can only be gulp it if that digital control on borders is solidly proven and internationally accepted; yet still the people of Britain have to endorse it first. Unity of the Kingdom cannot be rouletted in politics.
    Now they are resisting the people’s vote as a treason to the peoples will endorsed in the last referendum. If I may make a plea, if the people at the first referendum knew that they had to place the unity of the UK in peril for cherry-picking in a Brexit deal, they would be committing treason as the Sovereign had not consented to it. To avert that scenario, it is wiser to accept that those who voted to leave did not have that in mind and therefore to re-run an educated referendum as the result of the first one is obviously flawed from the understanding shown by its peers.
                  

Arabic Forum

12-12-2018, 08:20 PM
Saeed Mohammed Adnan
<aSaeed Mohammed Adnan
Registered: 08-26-2014
Total Posts: 132






Re: Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan � (Re: سعيد محمد عدنان)

    Please consider this a corrected script of the above essay with correction set in bold letters
    The Conservatives wriggle at the dawning of the real meaning of the farce of Brexit is shameful. It is understandable that one can erroneously make a naïve choice, easily, no shame in that; we all err. But to realise the folly masking the gravity of that error and still err, is a sharp twist into treason. A normal referendum to consult the people of Britain whether to leave or remain in the European Union was cast on a depth-less enlightenment of what it entails. Voters were made to see the benefit of a wider trade opportunity, a chance to halt free movement and a grip on sovereignty, old style. But they were looking at a masked reality of how vulnerable the nation is prior to healing its division wounds and reunion tasks. After lengthy and bloody civil wars and rescue from a cliff edge of a Northern Ireland crisis with the currents it induces from intertwining American interests, the Good Friday agreement was thankfully just brokered in such intertwining wills to avert a disaster.
    Any will intended to shape The UK politics should refrain from unity jeopardy, especially for Northern Ireland where a serious division of the populace of the United Kingdom may endanger the whole country.
    To conceal the imperfection of achieving the goal of free international trade while enjoying the privileges of the European Union, the Brexiteers costly negotiated blotched deals in cherry-picking from the basic Four Freedoms of the European Union, giving a Backstop on the unity of the country as an indemnity to trust the success of digitally impervious border, where they were ready to stake the country’s sovereignty to the detriment of the European Union pleasure, thus defeating the matter of sovereignty theystarted the Brexit for. That can only be gulped if that digital control on borders is solidly proven and internationally accepted, as controlling a boarder has to first have a border set, which is the danger to the unity of the country; yet still the people of Britain have to endorse it first. Unity of the Kingdom cannot be rouletted in politics.Now they are resisting the people’s vote as a treason to the peoples will endorsed in the last referendum. If I may make a plea, if the people at the first referendum knew that they had to place the unity of the UK in peril for cherry-picking in a Brexit deal, they would be committing treason as the Sovereign had not consented to it. To avert that scenario, it is wiser to accept that those who voted to leave did not have that in mind and therefore to re-run an educated referendum as the result of the first one is obviously flawed from the misinformationshown by its peers

    (Edited by Saeed Mohammed Adnan on 12-12-2018, 08:55 PM)

                  

Arabic Forum

[Post A Reply] Page 1 of 1:   <<  1  >>

Comments of SudaneseOnline.com readers on that topic:

Is Brexit a Token of Concession on The UK Sovereignty؟ By Saeed M. Adnan – London – UK
at FaceBook
Report any abusive and or inappropriate material



Articles and Views
اراء حرة و مقالات
News and Press Releases
اخبار و بيانات
اخر المواضيع فى المنبر العام
Latest Posts in English Forum



فيس بوك جوجل بلس تويتر انستقرام يوتيوب بنتيريست Google News
الرسائل والمقالات و الآراء المنشورة في المنتدى بأسماء أصحابها أو بأسماء مستعارة لا تمثل بالضرورة الرأي الرسمي لصاحب الموقع أو سودانيز اون لاين بل تمثل وجهة نظر كاتبها
لا يمكنك نقل أو اقتباس اى مواد أعلامية من هذا الموقع الا بعد الحصول على اذن من الادارة
About Us
Contact Us
About Sudanese Online
اخبار و بيانات
اراء حرة و مقالات
صور سودانيزاونلاين
فيديوهات سودانيزاونلاين
ويكيبيديا سودانيز اون لاين
منتديات سودانيزاونلاين
News and Press Releases
Articles and Views
SudaneseOnline Images
Sudanese Online Videos
Sudanese Online Wikipedia
Sudanese Online Forums
If you're looking to submit News,Video,a Press Release or or Article please feel free to send it to [email protected]

© 2014 SudaneseOnline.com


Software Version 1.3.0 © 2N-com.de