|
كتب الكاتب الفاتح جبرا المتوفرة بمعرض الدوحة
|
|
 Re: بعد مقتل جورج فلويد.. هل هناك andquot;فضائح مش� (Re: Yasir Elsharif)
|
Germany: New evidence incriminates the police in death of African refugee
By Martin Kreickenbaum
20 November 2013
Nine years after the death of Oury Jalloh, a new report by a fire expert has refuted claims by the German police and judicial authorities that the African asylum seeker accidentally burned himself to death.
Maksim Smirnou, an Irish fire investigator, writes in his final report that the fire at the police station in Dessau could only have been caused by the use of some sort of flammable material and extensive tampering with a fireproof mattress. The report concluded that Oury Jalloh must have been murdered.
Despite two court hearings into the death of Oury Jalloh, a citizen of Sierra Leone, no clarification of the actual course of events has been forthcoming until now. In the first court case, police officers accused of involuntary manslaughter were acquitted. On appeal, police unit leader Andreas S. was sentenced to a fine of €10,800, because he ignored the fire alarm for several minutes and turned down an intercom speaker, which clearly relayed the sound of crackling fire.
The officers at the police station either failed to remember anything of relevance to the court case, or gave obviously prearranged and virtually identically worded statements. For their part, the public prosecutor and judges saw no need to penetrate this wall of silence and willingly played along with the ruse, adhering only to the hypothesis that Oury Jalloh had set himself on fire. Issues involving disappearing evidence, shoddy investigative work and conflicting statements from witnesses were consistently and deliberately dismissed. A suspicion that the policemen themselves may have been responsible for the death of the asylum seeker was never allowed to surface.
From the beginning, the many inconsistencies in the case made the alleged self-immolation of Oury Jalloh the most unlikely cause of his death.
The only event hitherto unchallenged is that, on the morning of the January 7, 2005, Oury Jalloh, in a drunken condition, was seized by police in Dessau. He refused to comply with a request to verify his identity because, being an asylum seeker, he had to report regularly to the police, and his personal details must already have been known. An emergency doctor, who was called to the scene, found a blood alcohol level of nearly 3 percent, but said Jalloh was fit to undergo detention. He was then taken to a cell in the basement of the police station and there, bound hand and foot, was strapped to a fireproof mattress.
Two hours later, the fire alarm went off, and then the spluttering sounds of fire were heard from the intercom system. But Andreas S., the section leader, ignored this at first. Only when the smoke alarm in the ventilation shaft sounded did Andreas S., together with another police officer, enter the cell block. But the heat and heavy smoke prevented them from freeing Jalloh from his bonds in the cell. He was thus left in the flames to die an agonising death.
Afterwards, police investigators swiftly concluded that Oury Jalloh had set fire to himself in his cell. The fact that such a finding was predetermined is clearly evident from the sound track of a video recording made by an investigator during the first inspection of cell after the tragedy: “I’m now in the basement, where a black African citizen set himself on fire in a detention cell...the first cell on the right was occupied by the black African and this is where he set himself on fire”.
On the same day the event took place, investigators settled on a version of what had happened: self-immolation. Investigations later carried out by the public prosecutor and the court led to the same conclusion. Elaborate reports were issued, attempting to explain how Oury Jalloh was acrobatically able to conjure a cigarette lighter from his pocket in order to burn the seams of his mattress so that he could open up its fireproof covering. According to the police and judiciary, it would then have been possible for him to ignite the mattress’s combustible padding. But how could a highly intoxicated person, whose hands and feet had been tightly strapped, do such a thing؟ This question has remained unanswered until now.
Moreover, no investigation was made into the actual course of the fire; only a theory of how it broke out was simulated on a computer. Light has now been shed on what really happened only due to the efforts of the Initiative in Memory of Oury Jalloh. It raised donations to finance a new report in order to clarify the issues.
Appointed as an expert witness, Irish thermal physicist Maksim Smirnou reconstructed the cell, included a fireproof mattress, and used a pig’s carcass to simulate a human body. But after even more than half an hour, he was able to elicit only a mild smouldering of part of the mattress padding, which also produced a small quantity of white smoke.
This finding strikingly contradicts the scene of the fire’s aftermath, recorded on video film, which showed an almost completely burnt-up mattress and a severely charred corpse. The police had also reported a heavy build-up of smoke and intense heat. However, Smirnou was able to generate something similar only by using a large amount of a combustive agent. He had to pour several gallons of gasoline over the mattress to finally reproduce something like the degree of destruction caused by the fire in the cell, as recorded on the video film.
Furthermore, cyanide was discovered during Jalloh’s autopsy. Smirnou explains in his report that cyanide develops from prussic acid, which typically forms during the use of fire accelerants. He also had to peel off a large part of the mattress’s fireproof covering in order to expose sufficient combustible padding—a feat that would have been impossible for a person strapped to the bedding.
Further questions are raised by the cigarette lighter, which police and judicial statements allege Jalloh used to set fire to himself. The lighter had initially not appeared on the list of evidence, but it suddenly and magically turned up a few days later. The officers claimed they discovered it under Jalloh’s corpse.
But the charring of the lighter simply doesn’t accord with other post-fire evidence. Virtually no fire damage would have occurred under Jalloh’s securely clamped body. In addition, neither fibre residues from the mattress or Jalloh’s clothes, nor traces of Jalloh’s DNA were found on the lighter. There is no evidence that the lighter came into contact with Jalloh’s clothes or the mattress.
The Jalloh family’s attorney, Gabriele Heinecke, also pointed to a further anomaly that has so far evaded the attention of the court. She said: “We have reliable information that Oury Jalloh had no epinephrine in his body, and so was not in a state of stress when he died. But one would certainly expect that he would have experienced stress, if he had set himself on fire and was conscious of the extreme pain of the burning. So we believe it is highly probable he was unconscious when the fire started and when it spread. He was still alive, he was still breathing, there was carbon in his lungs, he swallowed carbon; but we are convinced he was not conscious. This means he could not have been the person who started the fire”.
The Initiative in Memory of Oury Jalloh has now filed a criminal charge with the prosecutor general against unknown police officers for the murder of Oury Jalloh. It did so because it is apparent that moves were made from the outset to cover up the murder of Oury Jalloh. This is the only possible explanation for the disappearance of important evidence such as operation schedules, custody protocols, the handcuffs and video recordings.
No attempt was made to pursue eyewitness testimony that police officers Hans-Ulrich M. and Udo S. had again been with Jalloh in the cell around 11:30—half an hour before the outbreak of the fire—and that a pool of liquid had been seen in front of the cell before the fire occurred.
The fact that Oury Jalloh had been severely mistreated by the police before he was put into the cell had also gone largely unnoticed by the court. A second autopsy revealed that Jalloh’s nose had been broken and eardrum ruptured. Moreover, the Dessau police officers were known for their racist brutality, which had particularly been levelled against asylum seekers from Africa.
Instead of elucidating the sequence of events, the police did everything possible to silence the Initiative in Memory of Oury Jalloh and its founder Mouctar Bah, who had doubted the official version from the start.
In December 2005, flimsy reasons were produced to deprive Bah of the license for his telecafé, and he was subsequently allowed to work there only as an employee. Later, a search was make of Bah’s house, after he was accused of dealing in trousers stolen from a fashion boutique. But the boutique declared that no trousers were missing from the store. The same telecafé was subjected to a drug raid in December 2009. The police later had to admit that the operators and employees of the café themselves had drawn official attention to drug trafficking on the street.
Despite this seemingly overwhelming evidence, the judiciary continues to stonewall. Folker Bittman, chief public prosecutor for Dessau, did speak of “very serious, surprising and sometimes shocking findings”, and announced the commissioning of a new report. However, he also warned that “the basic arguments in Smirnous’s report (were) certainly not proven”. According to Bittman, “no fire accelerant was found at the scene, and we must therefore continue to assume that no third party was involved”.
In other words, the integrity of the police is to be viewed as above suspicion, just as the court’s ongoing conduct in the case.
The UK Guardian newspaper has drawn parallels between these proceedings and the case of National Socialist Underground (NSU) terror group. According to the Guardian, the investigating authorities failed in both these cases to investigate racist motives in possible homicide. The police consistently neglected to exercise the necessary diligence in an investigation involving a victim of an ethnic minority.
But these cases are not about neglect on the part of officials. In the case of the NSU terror cell, the German secret service infiltrated dozens of its operatives into its milieu and was undoubtedly well informed of, or even involved in the NSU’s crimes. In the case of Oury Jalloh, powerful evidence points towards the police as those responsible for starting the fire.
In both cases, important files disappeared or evidence was suppressed. But the judiciary refuses to budge from its official accounts, claiming that the state forces had nothing to do with the murders.
Contribute to the fight for socialism in 2020
We need you to help the WSWS and ICFI make 2020 the year of international socialist revival. We must expand our work and our influence in the international working class. If you agree, donate today. Thank you.
ــــــــــــــــ
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/11/20/germ-n20.html
| |
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: بعد مقتل جورج فلويد.. هل هناك andquot;فضائح مش� (Re: Yasir Elsharif)
|
The World from Berlin
'Police Are Responsible for the Lives of All Their Detainees'
A German court has reopened the case of an asylum seeker from Sierra Leone who died while in police custody in 2005. The man burned to death in his cell in the eastern city of Dessau after allegedly setting his mattress on fire -- despite being handcuffed to the bed at the time. German commentators welcomed the court's decision.
08.01.2010, 15.29 Uhr
A tribute to the late Oury Jalloh outside the police station in Dessau where he died in 2005
A tribute to the late Oury Jalloh outside the police station in Dessau where he died in 2005 DDP
Germany's Federal Court of Justice has reopened the case of an asylum seeker who died under mysterious circumstances while in police custody in Dessau, a city in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt, in 2005.
The Karlsruhe-based court on Thursday overturned a 2008 verdict by a Dessau court that acquitted a police officer who had allegedly failed to help Oury Jalloh when a fire broke out in his cell on Jan. 7, 2005. The judges argued there were too many gaps and inconsistencies in the case. The regional court in the state capital Magdeburg must now reopen the case and completely reconstruct the events surrounding Jalloh's death.
The Dessau court had ruled that the 23-year-old asylum seeker, who was from Sierra Leone, had committed suicide in his cell by setting his foam mattress on fire with a cigarette lighter. But observers pointed out that many of the details of the case seemed to make little sense. They asked how Jalloh had managed to set fire to a supposedly fire-resistant mattress cover while his hands and feet were handcuffed to the bed, and why someone in police custody had a cigarette lighter in his possession in the first place.
Jalloh had been put in the cell in the basement of the police station after being arrested for allegedly harassing two women. Police had handcuffed Jalloh, who had been severely intoxicated at the time of the arrest, to the bed after he allegedly resisted the officers. His death caused widespread outrage in Germany and internationally at the time.
The Karlsruhe judges questioned why the police officer in charge had not reacted more quickly when the smoke alarm went off. The officer had initially turned off the alarm instead of going to check on the prisoner. The Dessau court had ruled that the officer had not committed dereliction of duty because false alarms were apparently a common occurrence in the police station. The fact that a female police officer who had originally testified against her colleagues during the Dessau trial later retracted her testimony also raised suspicions that she had come under pressure from other officers not to speak out.
The Dessau judges also assumed that Jalloh's life could not have been saved even if the police officer had reacted immediately, given the speed with which the fire broke out. One of the open questions that will now be addressed is whether Jalloh could have been rescued if police had reacted more quickly. The Karlsruhe judges suggested that Jalloh might have cried out when the fire started, which would have alerted the police of the emergency earlier.
Friends of Jalloh and human rights activists staged a demonstration in Dessau Thursday, which was the fifth anniversary of the asylum seeker's death. Activists have long campaigned for the circumstances of the death to be investigated, with some believing that Jalloh was murdered by racist police. Human rights groups Thursday welcomed the court's decision, as did a lawyer representing Jalloh's family.
German commentators Friday supported the decision to reopen the case and called for more measures to prevent police abuses.
SPIEGEL ONLINE writes:
"In this case, the Federal Court of Justice was charged less with clarifying legal points and much more with considering the logic (of the argumentation in the original trial). The judges very carefully reviewed the assumptions of the Dessau district court, the assumptions which had led to the acquittal of the police officer, and repeatedly encountered gaps and things that were hard to believe."
"Friends of the late asylum seeker believe that Jalloh was set on fire by racist police. The federal court rightly believes that to be unlikely. It is more probable that Jalloh, who was very drunk, lit the fire in his cell in order to draw attention to himself, and then events got out of his control."
"Although the federal court was very thorough in the way it uncovered the gaps in the existing evidence, it was equally careful to skirt around the delicate issue of racism. But that could be the key to understanding the casual manner with which the police officer initially ignored the smoke alarm in the cell. Did the life of an African detainee perhaps not seem to him to be a priority؟"
The center-left Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:
"A man died in police custody. The police are responsible, without any exceptions, for the lives of their detainees -- whether it is a drunk local politician or a stoned asylum seeker. They have a duty to ensure the safety of the person in custody. This obligation is all the greater when they have put the man in handcuffs. The policeman in Dessau ignored this obligation to act -- a fact that is still true even if the detainee had set fire to the mattress in his cell by himself."
"The thoroughness (with which the justice system will now try to clear up Jalloh's death) is a signal to society.
Now no one will be able to say any longer that the judiciary swept a scandal under the carpet. On the contrary, they have removed the carpet and are trying to understand how such callousness can happen. Five years after the crime, it will not be any easier (to find out what happened). But the new attempt to clear up the case deserves respect."
The left-leaning Die Tageszeitung writes:
"Finally, a piece of good news in a case that could previously only be described as a scandal.
Unwillingness to cooperate, sloppiness and inconsistencies characterized the police investigation from the outset. During the Dessau trial, the chief witness, a policewoman who had initially testified against her colleagues, later retracted her statement
prompting the suspicion that pressure had been put on her to change her testimony. The Dessau court judge himself declared the trial to have failed."
"Five years on, it will not be any easier to answer the open questions in the case
But irrespective of whether the new trial leads to new information and a conviction, the federal court's ruling sends an important signal. It shows that the judiciary is not simply prepared to let police officers get off scot-free."
"This is particularly important as action is seldom taken in cases of police violence against immigrants.
The investigating officers tend to give their colleagues, rather than the immigrants, the benefit of the doubt.
In other European countries like Britain and Norway, such cases are investigated by independent commissions. Such a commission would perhaps have brought more truth to light in the Jalloh case. As it is, five years after the tragedy, the terrible suspicion remains that the police were -- at the very least -- negligent with Jalloh's safety because he was a refugee from Africa."
The left-leaning Berliner Zeitung writes:
"Right from the start, friends and relatives of Oury Jalloh and a number of human rights organizations suspected the Dessau police of being motivated by racism in their actions. Although this has not been proven by any means, it is too self-evident to be ignored. Firstly, people of color living in the state of Saxony-Anhalt are in more danger than anywhere else in Germany; racial abuse and racist attacks are not the exception here but part of everyday life. Secondly, the police have avoided doing anything that could have given the impression that they have any particular interest in clearing up such crimes."
-- David Gordon Smith
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
من موقع Spiegel
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: بعد مقتل جورج فلويد.. هل هناك andquot;فضائح مش� (Re: Yasir Elsharif)
|
Aamir Ageeb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amir Ageeb or Aamir Ageeb (c. 1969 – May 28, 1999) was a Sudanese who was killed while resisting deportation from Germany, leading to a lawsuit against the involved officers.
Ageeb fought fiercely with three Bundesgrenzschutz officers who tried to put him on an aircraft travelling to Sudan in Frankfurt am Main on May 28, 1999. They restrained him with several ropes, handcuffs and bands; put a helmet on his head; and pushed his head between his knees, apparently all in accordance with procedures in use at the time. Ageeb suffocated shortly after the aircraft took off.
As a result, deportation procedures for Bundesgrenzschutz officers have been changed, different helmets are now being used, and deportations are more frequently suspended.
The three officers were charged with voluntary manslaughter, and sentenced to nine months imprisonment on parole, with a fine for the family of Aamir Ageeb of Euro 2.000,- each.[1]
References
ONLINE, RP. "Urteil im Prozess um Tod bei Abschiebung: Bewährungsstrafen für Grenzschützer". RP ONLINE (in German). Retrieved 2020-05-07.
"Rights – Europe: Police Racial Intolerance Causes Concern". Inter Press Service English News Wire. 2000-04-08.
Boyes, Roger (2000-04-21). "Germany plans mass deportation of Kosovo exiles". The Times. Times Newspapers Ltd.
"Death of Sudanese Asylum-seeker". Res Publica. amnesty international. Archived from the original on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
Flag of SudanBiography icon This Sudanese biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Categories:
1969 births1999 deathsSudanese expatriates in GermanyPeople deported from GermanySudanese people stubs
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: بعد مقتل جورج فلويد.. هل هناك andquot;فضائح مش� (Re: Yasir Elsharif)
|
Death of Sudanese Asylum-seeker
LH 588 - Hörbildpräsentation Staatsanwaltschaft stellt Ermittlungsverfahren wegen Verdachts der Körperverletzung im Amt ein Diskussionsveranstaltung "Abu Ghraib lässt grüßen" Empfehlungen des UN-Anti-Folter-Auschusses an die Bundesregierung in Berlin diskutiert Neuer Prozess gegen BGS-Beamte nach Tod von Ageeb PRO ASYL erstattet Strafanzeige gegen vier BGS-Beamte Aktionsbündnis erstattet Anzeige gegen Kapitän „Fahrlässige Tötung durch Unterlassen“ Die Fesselung von Aamir Ageeb bei seiner Abschiebung ai: Prozessbeginn im Fall Aamir Ageeb Tod bei Abschiebung BGS-Beamte im Fall Aamir Ageeb wegen fahrlässiger Tötung angeklagt Prozess gegen BGS-Beamte beginnt am 02.02.2004 Kampagne gegen Abschiebungen Abschiebehaft und Abschiebelager Dritter Todestag des bei einer Abschiebung ums Leben gekommenen Sudanesen Aamir Ageeb Fesselungen bei Abschiebungen Untersuchungsbericht der Staatsanwaltschaft Frankfurt zu Aamir Ageebs Tod Neue Erkenntnisse zum Abschiebetod des Aamir Ageeb Informationspolitik der Bundesregierung zum Todesfall von Aamir Ageeb Abschiebepraxis bei Suizidgefahr Trug das Land Baden-Württemberg Mitverantwortung am Tod des abgeschobenen Sudanesen؟ Rückführungen werden wieder aufgenommen Bundesinnenministerium: Bericht über den Tod von Aamir Ageeb Schily: Erlaß bleibt vorerst bestehen Abschiebestop für Aufklärung nicht nötig Menschenrechte beginnen zu Hause! Stellungnahme zum Gerichtsmedizinischen Gutachten Rechtsmedizinisches Institut Uni München: Obduktionsbericht ai: Jahresbericht Deutschland 2003 ai: Jahresbericht Deutschland 2002 ai: Jahresbericht Deutschland 2001 ai: Jahresbericht Deutschland 2000 ai: Jahresbericht Deutschland 1999 ai: Jahresbericht Sudan 2002 ai: Jahresbericht Sudan 2001 ai: ai: Jahresbericht Sudan 2000 ai: Jahresbericht Sudan 1999 Der Fall Aamir Ageeb Ärzte als Abschiebehelfer؟ Sudanese bei Abschiebung umgekommen Death of Sudanese Asylum-seeker Concerns in Europe - Germany Zur ewigen Ruhe gefesselt Tod des Sudanesen Aamir Ageeb Hilfsmittel zur Durchführung von Abschiebungen unter Zwang Online-Demonstration Vereinigung Cockpit: Abschiebungen Redebeitrag im Namen der Studentlnnenschaft der KSFH München zum 1. Todestag Gedenken an Aamir Ageeb am 28.5.2000 in München Rede zur Gedenkveranstaltung am 28.5.2000 in München Gedenkveranstaltung zum 1. Todestag von Aamir Ageeb DeportationClass Stop! Staub-Bernasconi: Gedenkveranstaltung zum 1. Todestag von Aamir Ageeb Interreligiöse Gedenkveranstaltung zum 1. Todestag von Aamir Ageeb Rückführungen auf dem Luftweg Zum 1. Todestag von Aamir Ageeb Erklärung des Fachbereichsrats zum Tod von Aamir Ageeb Abschiebung: Klare Verantwortung herstellen Rede bei der Demonstration in Hamburg Wir trauern um Aamir Ageeb!!! Wir trauern um Aamir Mohamed Ageeb! Der Abschiebetod von Aamir Ageeb hätte vermieden werden können Resolution der StudentInnen der KSFH München
amnesty international, public statement, 3 June 1999
Federal Republic of Germany
Death of Sudanese Asylum-seeker
Amnesty International today expressed concern about the tragic death of Aamir Ageeb, a 30-year old Sudanese asylum-seeker, who died on the evening of 28 May 1999 during an attempt to forcibly deport him from Frankfurt am Main airport, Germany. Amnesty International is extremely concerned that Aamir Ageeb may have died as a direct or indirect result of his treatment by three officers of the German border police.
Amnesty International believes that it is the responsibility of the German government to ensure that deportations are carried out in accordance with international standards and in a manner which respects the human rights of the deportees.
Aamir Ageeb was escorted by three police officers to Frankfurt am Main airport on the evening of 28 May, to be put on a Lufthansa flight from Frankfurt to Cairo and then on to Khartoum. Before departure Aamir Ageeb’s arms and legs were reportedly bound by the police officers and a helmet placed on his head when he resisted deportation. After he was placed in a seat by the police officers, he allegedly continued to struggle. The police officers are then reported to have forced the detainee’s head between his knees and kept him in this position until the aeroplane had taken off.
After take-off Aamir Ageeb stopped struggling and was pulled upright by the police officers. When the helmet was removed from his head the police officers noticed that he had stopped breathing. Several doctors on the aeroplane attempted in vain to revive him.
Amnesty International believes that unless legislation and regulations are enacted to provide safeguards that a deportee’s inherent dignity is respected, there is no guarantee that deaths like that of Aamir Ageeb will not recur.
The human rights organization has written to the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany expressing its concern about the use of the restraint techniques used in the case of Aamir Ageeb. The organization is particularly concerned about the use of the helmet during his forced deportation and the force exerted on him during take-off.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Internal Affairs stated on 30 May that helmets are employed by the authorities to protect the deportee from physical injury during their forced deportation and to protect police officers from being bitten. Amnesty International has asked to be informed of the type of helmets employed during forced deportation and the guidelines relating to their use. The organization is especially concerned that the use of a full-faced helmet with a face visor could impede the breathing of a deportee. Similarly, a helmet strap could cause breathing difficulties if fastened too tight. The organization believes that breathing difficulties might be exacerbated in cases where a deportee struggles and resists deportation.
Amnesty International is also concerned about the technique of restraining a deportee in the sitting position by forcing the upper body forward onto, and below, the knees. The organization believes that this technique may impede the breathing of a deportee, especially when pressure is exerted and other restraints are employed. The human rights organization has asked to be informed whether this technique is permitted as a form of restraint, and if so, under what circumstances. In addition, Amnesty International has asked to be informed what guidelines exist relating to the use of this technique and other forms of restraint.
Amnesty International welcomes the announcement that an investigation will be held into the circumstances surrounding this tragic death and hopes that the investigation will be full and impartial. It has asked to be informed of the findings of investigation. The organization also welcomes the announcement that there will be a temporary suspension of forced expulsions from Germany.
Background
The death of Aamir Ageeb is not the first case of an asylum-seeker having died after being restrained during forced expulsion at Frankfurt am Main airport. In August 1994 a Nigerian national, Kola Bankole, died of heart failure during his forced deportation from Frankfurt am Main airport. He was restrained, sedated and gagged with a device made by one of the police officers at home from socks and a belt from a window blind.
Source: Amnesty International, International Secretariat, 1 Easton Street, WC1X 8DJ, London, United Kingdom
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: بعد مقتل جورج فلويد.. هل هناك andquot;فضائح مش� (Re: Yasir Elsharif)
|
توفي عصام الدين الشريف السيد، 51 سنة، الشهير بعصام الزعيم، في نورمبيرغ بألمانيا بعد مشادة مع رجال السيكيوريتي بعد نهاية احتفالية تخص الشركة التي يعمل بها في أحد الصالات المخصصة لمثل هذه الاحتفالات حسب إفادة المصادر. ما حدث هو أن عصام أراد أن يستقل عربة تاكسي بعد منتصف ليل الخميس وفجر الجمعة ليصل بها إلى منزله ونشبت مشادة حضر فيها رجال السيكيوريتي الذين قاموا فيها بتثبيته على الأرض إلى أن فقد الوعي. عندما حضرت الشرطة تم نقله إلى المستشفى وأجريت له إسعافات إنقاذ الحياة ووضع تحت الأجهزة الطبية للتنفس والدورة الدموية من فجر الجمعة 21 سبتمبر ولكن لم يعد إليه وعيه حتى نهار الاثنين 24 سبتمبر حيث تم إيقاف الأجهزة وفارق الحياة.
تم الدفن اليوم الجمعة 28 سبتمبر الساعة الواحدة ظهرا في نورمبيرغ. المتوفي أب لأربعة أطفال أكبرهم في سن 16 وأصغرهم سنة ونصف السنة.
الشرطة تحقق الآن مع رجال السيكيورتي حسب إفادة المصادر.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Yasir Elsharif
Maawya Hussein
أمير فرح
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست