فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق)

مرحبا Guest
اخر زيارك لك: 04-25-2024, 09:03 AM الصفحة الرئيسية

منتديات سودانيزاونلاين    مكتبة الفساد    ابحث    اخبار و بيانات    مواضيع توثيقية    منبر الشعبية    اراء حرة و مقالات    مدخل أرشيف اراء حرة و مقالات   
News and Press Releases    اتصل بنا    Articles and Views    English Forum    ناس الزقازيق   
مدخل أرشيف الربع الأول للعام 2007م
نسخة قابلة للطباعة من الموضوع   ارسل الموضوع لصديق   اقرا المشاركات فى شكل سلسلة « | »
اقرا احدث مداخلة فى هذا الموضوع »
01-15-2007, 01:57 PM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق)

    Quote: شهدت مدينة أبيي تطورات خطيره جداً حيث إحتلت مجموعه من أبناء دينكا أبيي صباح أمس الوحده الإداريه والمرافق الحكوميه وطردوا منها الموظفين وأنزلوا اللافتات ورفعوا أخرى كتبوا عليها (جمهورية السودان الجديد) وطوفت المجموعه التي قالت أنها منظمات مجتمع مدني سوق المدينه وأغلقت المحلات التجاريه وبأت البحث عن شخصيات من بينها أيوم ماتيب ومحمد جعفر المدير التنفيذي للوحده الإداريه ..


    اخر لحظه 15/1/2007
                  

01-15-2007, 02:54 PM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: إنقطعت منذ الأمس وسائل الإتصال بالمدينه وقالت مصادر موثوقه ل(اخر لحظه) إن المجموعه التي كان عدد منها يحمل السلاح يعتقد إنتماؤهم للحركه الشعبيه ، كانت تردد عبارات تؤكد فيها تبعية أبيي للجنوب وقالت إن هذه المجموعه تحركت إحتجاجاُ على خطاب المشير عمر البشير الذي أكد فيه أن تقرير الخبراء تجاوز ماتم الإتفاق عليه في نيفاشا ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                  

01-15-2007, 05:18 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: : إنقطعت منذ الأمس وسائل الإتصال بالمدينه وقالت مصادر موثوقه ل(اخر لحظه) إن المجموعه التي كان عدد منها يحمل السلاح يعتقد إنتماؤهم للحركه الشعبيه ، كانت تردد عبارات تؤكد فيها تبعية أبيي للجنوب وقالت إن هذه المجموعه تحركت إحتجاجاُ على خطاب المشير عمر البشير الذي أكد فيه أن تقرير الخبراء تجاوز ماتم الإتفاق عليه في نيفاشا ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




    · · · أبحث · ملفك ·






    GO ON YOUR REPORT
                  

01-15-2007, 05:34 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: . ABYEI PROTOCOL:

    On the Abyei Protocol, the SPLM and the GOSS stand firm in full support of the Abyei Border Commission (ABC) Experts' decision. The decision of the experts is final and binding as per the CPA, on Abyei Protocol and neither party has no right to change it. The Experts never exceeded their mandate, but did what they were mandated to do. The people of Abyei must have a functioning Administration, so that they also enjoy the fruits of peace, they had struggled for. In the light of the deadlock reached by the parties in the CPA, I hereby take this opportunity to call upon lGAD, the friends of lGAD who helped in the peace process and the international community to help our partners to implement the Abyei Protocol without any further delays.






    أقرأ هذه الفقرة من خطاب الرئيس سلفاكير بخصوص ابيي!!
    جوك
                  

01-15-2007, 05:44 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: Sudan: Abyei Boundary Commission report
    On May 26, 2004 at peace talks in Naivasha, Kenya the Sudanese government and John Garang's South Sudan rebel group SPLM/A exchanged protocols dealing with the outstanding issues of power sharing, the two disputed areas of Nuba and Southern Blue Nile, and a third disputed area, Abyei.

    On July 13, 2005 UNMIS announced the Abyei Boundary Commission report was to be released to the Sudanese Presidency within a few days.

    The Abyei Boundary Commission is made up of five international boundary specialists and one representative from each of the two parties. The chairman of the commission is Don Petterson, a former US ambassador to Sudan.

    Excerpt from Crisis Group Report August 9, 2005:
    Abyei was defined under the CPA as the traditional territory of the nine Ngok Dinka chiefdoms transferred to Kordofan in 1905. The Abyei Boundary Commission defined this as a broad area stretching from the borders of Bahr el-Ghazal, east to the border with Upper Nile, and north to the villages of Umm Sakina, Turda and Edd Dibekir.

    The district of Abyei, which South and North both claim, was one of the most divisive issues during the negotiations, and it is a potential flashpoint in the immediate aftermath of Garang's death. The recent report of the Abyei Boundary Commission defined the area broadly, stretching well north of the Bahr el-Arab (River Kiir), and well east of Abyei town, to the Upper Nile border. The report was met with threats of violence by the elements of the Misseriya community who continue to view the Abyei agreement, with its built-in referendum to choose between joining the North or South, as a zero-sum game in which they risk losing their traditional grazing routes to the Dinka and ultimately to an independent South. Although the parties agreed the Commission's decision would be binding, President Bashir has stated publicly that he disagrees with it, and hard-line elements in Khartoum may seek to use the Misseriya as proxies to destabilise the region and scuttle the CPA, particularly as the Commission included the region's oil areas within Abyei's boundaries.

    Many Ngok Dinka, the inhabitants of this region, have senior SPLM positions and were close to Garang. Those relationships made negotiating the Abyei issue more difficult, as Garang had little room to manoeuvre and had to satisfy their demand for the historically promised (but never implemented) referendum. That many senior Ngok Dinka in the SPLM who shared a special relationship with Garang will not necessarily enjoy the same support from Salva Kiir could emerge as a fault-line if tensions in Abyei continue to heat up. The Ngok Dinka and Misseriya communities must receive assurances that their land and grazing rights will be guaranteed irrespective of the referendum's outcome.
    [For analysis of the Abyei question, see Crisis Group Report, The Khartoum-SPLM Agreement, op. cit., as well as Crisis Group Africa Briefing No. 4, Sudan's Other Wars, 23 June 2003; Crisis Group Africa Report No. 65, Sudan Endgame, 7 July 2003; and Crisis Group Africa Report No. 73, Sudan: Towards an Incomplete Peace, 11 December 2003.]
    - - -

    UN envoy continues talks with southern rebel leaders, civil society

    UN News Centre August 15 confirms Jan Pronk, the top United Nations envoy in Sudan, has met with opposition leaders in the capitol, Khartoum, and will head to Darfur today for a two-day visit to North and South Darfur where he is expected to assess the humanitarian and security situation there. Report excerpt:
    "The UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) reported that Mr Pronk met Friday with senior members of the SPLM and civil society groups.

    The meeting focused mainly on the Abyei Boundary Commission's report, which was released in mid-July.

    Abyei is a disputed enclave in northern Bahr el-Ghazal province, and negotiations on its status were considered a main concern in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), which in January ended Sudan's two decade war between southern-based rebels and the Government. Mr. Pronk urged that the issue be dealt with as a high priority item on the agenda of the Presidency."
    - - -

    70% of increased aid needs in Sudan are in the East and South
    "Meanwhile, on the humanitarian front, the UN World Food Programme (WFP) has expressed concern about the chronically impoverished regions of Bahr el-Ghazal in the South, and the Kordofans in central Sudan and Red Sea state and Kassala in the East.

    The East and Bahr El Ghazal account for 70 per cent of the increased needs in Sudan.

    WFP has warned that its response is severely hampered by critical funding shortages, the late arrival of donor funds and severe shortages of Jet-A1 fuel - as well as limitations on road deliveries and airlifts imposed by the rainy season. These problems sabotaged WFP's efforts to deliver by air and pre-position food aid before rains cut road access in much of the south."
    - - -

    Mistriyah in north Darfur, is the heartland of the powerful Arab Rizeigat tribe, of which Janjaweed leader Musa Hilal is the chief

    The following are a series of notes to myself for future reference:

    Musa Hilal, who is suspected by the US state department of being a leader of the Arab Janjaweed militia, is a tribal leader from northern Darfur who lives in the Sudanese capital Khartoum. He is thought to be running one of 16 known Janjaweed bases.

    Last July, the Guardian spoke to a deserter from a training camp run by Mr Hilal, who said the Janjaweed commander whipped up racial hatred among his fighters. When the recruits first arrived in the camp, at Mistiriyha in north Darfur, Mr Hilal made a speech in which he told them that all Africans were their enemies.
    "Musa Hilal said: 'Zurgha [blacks] always support the rebels. We should defeat the rebels,'" said the deserter, Mustafa Yusuf, 18. Mr Yusuf also witnessed Mr Hilal leading troops into battle. "Musa Hilal led the troops. He was in the Landcruisers, and there were people on horses," he said.
    Mistiriyha, the heartland of the powerful Arab Rizeigat tribe, of which Musa Hilal is the chief.
    U.N. sources say Hilal is likely to be on a list of 51 government, militia and rebel leaders suspected of crimes against humanity in Darfur which was handed to the International Criminal Court in April, 2005.
    - - -

    Excerpt from HRW Sudan: Darfur Destroyed: SUMMARY dated May 2004:

    Some Arab nomads are given automatic arms and free rein to attack their usual African sparring partners, in the name of government counterinsurgency.130

    Many or most of the Janjaweed leaders were emirs or omdas from Arab tribes, and several were appointed by the government in the administrative reorganization of the mid-1990s. The participation by ethnic-political leaders leads to increasing ethnic polarization as members of one ethnic group are summoned and recruited by their leaders to join in a free-for-all war against another ethnic group.

    The Janjaweed are not simply a few side-lined ostracized outlaws, as the government suggests. Among the leaders participating in the war in Darfur against the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa are:

    - Hamid Dawai, an emir of the Beni Halba tribe and Janjaweed leader in the Terbeba-Arara-Bayda triangle where 460 civilians were killed between August 2003 and April 2004. He has residences in Geneina and Bayda.

    - Abdullah abu Shineibat, an emir of the Beni Halba tribe and Janjaweed leader in the Habila-Murnei area. He has residences in Geneina and Habila.

    - Omda Saef, an omda of the Awlad Zeid tribe and leader of the Janjaweed from Geneina to Misterei. He has a residence in Geneina.

    - Omar Babbush, an omda of the Misseriya tribe and leader of the Janjaweed from Habila to Forbranga, with a residence in Forbranga.

    - Ahmad Dekheir, an omda of the Ma'alia tribe and leader of the Janjaweed in Murnei.

    Instead of taking strong action against the Janjaweed, the government has incorporated many into its formal security structures, principally the Popular Defence Forces (PDF) and Border Intelligence Guard, but also the Popular Police (Shorta Shabiya) and Nomadic Police (Shorta Zana). In addition to these "formal" groups, there are other tribal militias armed by the government, such as Musa Hilal's infamous El-Khafif, El-Sariya, El-Muriya (The light, the fast, the fearful), based in the Kebkabiya area of North Darfur.

    The Border Intelligence Guard (Istikhbarat Al-Hudud), headed by General Al-Hadi el-Tayeed, appears increasingly to be the body of choice for the integration of Janjaweed. It was created in early 2003 in a public ceremony during which the government granted amnesty to a large number of prisoners, enlisting them to fight the rebels. It is annexed to the army, which funds it, but controlled by Military Intelligence. It is given both arms and logistical help by the army and can call for air and armed support as needed. "This is now the core of the Janjaweed", explained a Sudanese observer.

    The government clearly believes it can avoid penalties, making for an easy choice between inaction and the admittedly difficult process of now neutralising the militia groups it created. Unfortunately, the international community has not yet acted to influence this calculation. A government official explained candidly:

    There are many in the government who are pleased with the work of Musa Hilal and other Janjaweed leaders, because they've protected the government interests in Darfur. Those who committed war crimes should be brought to justice but we are afraid of the backlash. Musa Hilal for example, has 3,000 to 4,000 soldiers under him. If we arrest him, they will turn on us. The government has to weigh that against the outside pressure to take action, and possible repercussions from inaction.

    In early November, Musa Hilal was promoted from a colonel in the PDF to a brigadier general in the General Security Services.
    - - -

    Excerpt from ICG report 8 March 2005 entitled Darfur: The Failure to Protect (ICG) [Note last paragraph about a third new group, al-Shahamah, is made up of Misseriya in neighbouring Western Kordofan. It emerged in October 2004 and was reportedly led by Musa Ali Muhamadein, a former follower of Popular Congress Chairman Hassan el-Turabi and a former leader of the Popular Defence Forces in Western Kordofan.]
    On 18 December, the NMRD signed a separate ceasefire with the government, mediated by Chad. It reaffirms the accords signed with the SLA and JEM and calls for creation of a parallel international monitoring mechanism for its implementation. The government also reiterated its pledge to disarm militias.

    While the details remain murky, two conclusions can be drawn. First, the NMRD has received significant support, presumably from either the Chad or Sudan government. Some well-placed sources suggest the seed money for Deby's help originated in Khartoum. Reports from eyewitnesses who have encountered the NMRD in Jebel Moon are that it has new cars and uniforms, rockets, and heavy guns, which suggest an outside backer. Secondly, it does not appear to be receiving Khartoum's support now. It has clashed with government forces on multiple occasions since early September 2004, and at least once with JEM, in late October. Reports of up to three NMRD camps in Chad suggest that if support is still flowing, it originates there.

    The second new group, Khorbaj, is predominantly Arab and said to be based in South Darfur. Little is known of it, although anonymous statements have been distributed that claim to represent its views. It has not yet done anything in the field but two versions of its purported intentions are emerging. The first is that it is a government creation, designed to organise the Arabs into a "legitimate" political movement, thus further complicating the situation and undermining rebel claims to represent Darfur in any negotiations. The second posits that it is part of a much larger, still evolving, movement within the Arab tribes to assert their independence from and opposition to the government. There is said to be a growing realisation among many in those tribes that have joined Khartoum's counter-insurgency strategy that they have been badly used and will not benefit from continuing the conflict. Contacts between Arab leaders, in some cases Janjaweed, and the SLA have been increasing since mid-2004, when international pressure to disarm the Janjaweed was at a peak. Fearing they would become scapegoats, some Janjaweed opened channels to explore an alliance.

    Some contacts go back even further. A meeting was scheduled in December 2003 between some Arab leaders fighting for the government and then SLA Secretary General Abdallah Abaker, who was killed the following month in a government attack. The government learned of the meeting and bombed the site before it could take place, thus increasing mistrust among the Arab tribes involved and the SLA. The elements within Arab tribes which have concluded the conflict does not serve their interests are now reportedly trying to establish a stand-alone Arab movement in Darfur, to fight against the government and establish ties on equal footing with the SLA and JEM. Khorbaj may be a manifestation of this but too little is known to be certain.

    The third new group, al-Shahamah, is made up of Misseriya in neighbouring Western Kordofan. It emerged in October 2004 and was reportedly led by Musa Ali Muhamadein, a former follower of Popular Congress Chairman Hassan el-Turabi and a former leader of the Popular Defence Forces in Western Kordofan. He is said to have died on 30 November of natural causes in the SPLM-held town of Warawar, in northern Bahr el-Ghazal. The group has distributed anti-government pamphlets in parts of Western Kordofan, vowing to fight against dissolution of that state, which has been agreed to in the Nuba Mountains/Southern Kordofan agreement reached between the government and SPLM. There were attacks on government posts in the Western Kordofan towns of Gubeish and Magror in late September and early October, and though blame was originally given to the JEM and SLA, it may be that those operating as al-Shahamah were also involved.

    A fourth group, the Sudanese Movement for the Eradication of Marginalisation, apparently debuted in mid-December with a high profile attack on government oil installations at Sharef, near the border of South Darfur and Western Kordofan. It has since emerged that this was an SLA action. Interviews with numerous SLA supporters indicate that it undertook the attack as a response to the government offensive then
                  

01-15-2007, 05:50 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: JOK BIONG)

    Quote: underway but sought to conceal its identity to avoid international condemnation.
    [/QUO
                      

01-15-2007, 09:24 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    With the exception of a fragile peace established by negotiations between southern Sudanese insurgents (the Anya Nya) and the Sudan government at Addis Ababa in 1972, and lasting until the resumption of the conflict in 1983, southern Sudan has been a battlefield. The north-south distinction and the hostility between the two regions of Sudan is grounded in religious conflict as well as a conflict between peoples of differing culture and language. The language and culture of the north are based on Arabic and the Islamic faith, whereas the south has its own diverse, mostly non-Arabic languages and cultures -- with few exceptions non-Muslim, and its religious character was indigenous (traditional or Christian).

    The origins of the civil war in the south date back to the 1950s. On August 18, 1955, the Equatoria Corps, a military unit composed of southerners, mutinied at Torit. Rather than surrender to Sudanese government authorities, many mutineers disappeared into hiding with their weapons, marking the beginning of the first war in southern Sudan. By the late 1960s, the war had resulted in the deaths of about 500,000 people. Several hundred thousand more southerners hid in the forests or escaped to refugee camps in neighboring countries. By 1969 the rebels had developed foreign contacts to obtain weapons and supplies. Israel, for example, trained Anya Nya recruits and shipped weapons via Ethiopia and Uganda to the rebels. Anya Nya also purchased arms from Congolese rebels. Government operations against the rebels declined after the 1969 coup, and ended with the Addis Ababa accords of 1972 which guaranteed autonomy for the southern region.

    The civil war resumed in 1983 when President Nimeiri imposed Shari'a law, and has resulted in the death of more than 1.5 million Sudanese since through 1997. The principal insurgent faction is the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), a body created by the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). The SPLA was formed in 1983 when Lieutenant Colonel John Garang of the SPAF was sent to quell a mutiny in Bor of 500 southern troops who were resisting orders to be rotated to the north. Instead of ending the mutiny, Garang encouraged mutinies in other garrisons and set himself at the head of the rebellion against the Khartoum government. Garang, a Dinka born into a Christian family, had studied at Grinnell College, Iowa, and later returned to the United States to take a company commanders' course at Fort Benning, Georgia, and again to earn advanced economics degrees at Iowa State University. By 1986 the SPLA was estimated to have 12,500 adherents organized into twelve battalions and equipped with small arms and a few mortars. By 1989 the SPLA's strength had reached 20,000 to 30,000; by 1991 it was estimated at 50,000 to 60,000.

    Since 1983, the SPLA has been divided into 3 main factions: the SPLA Torit faction led by John Garang; the SPLA Bahr-al-Ghazal faction led by Carabino Kuany Bol; and the South Sudan Independence Movement led by Rick Machar. These internal divisions have intensified fighting in the south, hampering any potential peace settlement. The SPLA remains the principal military force in the insurgency.

    In April 1997 the South Sudan Independence Movement/Army (SSIM/A), which broke away from the SPLA, and several smaller southern factions concluded a peace agreement with the Government. These former insurgent elements then formed the United Democratic Salvation Front (UDSF). However, the SPLM, its armed wing, the SPLM/A, and most independent analysts have regarded the April 21 Agreement as a tactical government effort to enlist southerners on its side. The SPLM/A and its northern allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) carried out successful military offensives in areas along the borders with Ethiopia and Eritrea and in large parts of the south during the year. Neither side appears to have the ability to win the war militarily.

    In 1996 the US government decided to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the 'front-line' states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime. US officials denied that the military aid for the SPLA and the Sudanese Allied Forces (SAF), described as 'non-lethal' -- including radios, uniforms, boots and tents -- was targeted at Sudan. The Pentagon and CIA considered Sudan to be second only to Iran as a staging ground for international terrorism. CIA Director John Deutch made a 3-day visit to the Ethiopian capital in April 1996, where he noted that funds had been significantly increased for a more activist policy including preemptive strikes against terrorists and their sponsors. Reportedly several Operational Detachments-Alpha (also called A-Teams) of the US army were operating in support of the SPLA.


    Sources and Resources
    SPLM Today the official web site of the SPLM/A
    Sudan Tribune
    sudan.net
    South Sudan Online: ReliefWeb

    Prolonged Wars: The War in Sudan Barnabas L. Wama; John R. Reese (Faculty Advisor) Air Command and Staff College 1997 - The struggle has become prolonged far beyond either side's desire to continue, with polarization so profound that neither side can end the contest without admitting defeat.
                  

01-15-2007, 09:24 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    With the exception of a fragile peace established by negotiations between southern Sudanese insurgents (the Anya Nya) and the Sudan government at Addis Ababa in 1972, and lasting until the resumption of the conflict in 1983, southern Sudan has been a battlefield. The north-south distinction and the hostility between the two regions of Sudan is grounded in religious conflict as well as a conflict between peoples of differing culture and language. The language and culture of the north are based on Arabic and the Islamic faith, whereas the south has its own diverse, mostly non-Arabic languages and cultures -- with few exceptions non-Muslim, and its religious character was indigenous (traditional or Christian).

    The origins of the civil war in the south date back to the 1950s. On August 18, 1955, the Equatoria Corps, a military unit composed of southerners, mutinied at Torit. Rather than surrender to Sudanese government authorities, many mutineers disappeared into hiding with their weapons, marking the beginning of the first war in southern Sudan. By the late 1960s, the war had resulted in the deaths of about 500,000 people. Several hundred thousand more southerners hid in the forests or escaped to refugee camps in neighboring countries. By 1969 the rebels had developed foreign contacts to obtain weapons and supplies. Israel, for example, trained Anya Nya recruits and shipped weapons via Ethiopia and Uganda to the rebels. Anya Nya also purchased arms from Congolese rebels. Government operations against the rebels declined after the 1969 coup, and ended with the Addis Ababa accords of 1972 which guaranteed autonomy for the southern region.

    The civil war resumed in 1983 when President Nimeiri imposed Shari'a law, and has resulted in the death of more than 1.5 million Sudanese since through 1997. The principal insurgent faction is the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), a body created by the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). The SPLA was formed in 1983 when Lieutenant Colonel John Garang of the SPAF was sent to quell a mutiny in Bor of 500 southern troops who were resisting orders to be rotated to the north. Instead of ending the mutiny, Garang encouraged mutinies in other garrisons and set himself at the head of the rebellion against the Khartoum government. Garang, a Dinka born into a Christian family, had studied at Grinnell College, Iowa, and later returned to the United States to take a company commanders' course at Fort Benning, Georgia, and again to earn advanced economics degrees at Iowa State University. By 1986 the SPLA was estimated to have 12,500 adherents organized into twelve battalions and equipped with small arms and a few mortars. By 1989 the SPLA's strength had reached 20,000 to 30,000; by 1991 it was estimated at 50,000 to 60,000.

    Since 1983, the SPLA has been divided into 3 main factions: the SPLA Torit faction led by John Garang; the SPLA Bahr-al-Ghazal faction led by Carabino Kuany Bol; and the South Sudan Independence Movement led by Rick Machar. These internal divisions have intensified fighting in the south, hampering any potential peace settlement. The SPLA remains the principal military force in the insurgency.

    In April 1997 the South Sudan Independence Movement/Army (SSIM/A), which broke away from the SPLA, and several smaller southern factions concluded a peace agreement with the Government. These former insurgent elements then formed the United Democratic Salvation Front (UDSF). However, the SPLM, its armed wing, the SPLM/A, and most independent analysts have regarded the April 21 Agreement as a tactical government effort to enlist southerners on its side. The SPLM/A and its northern allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) carried out successful military offensives in areas along the borders with Ethiopia and Eritrea and in large parts of the south during the year. Neither side appears to have the ability to win the war militarily.

    In 1996 the US government decided to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the 'front-line' states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime. US officials denied that the military aid for the SPLA and the Sudanese Allied Forces (SAF), described as 'non-lethal' -- including radios, uniforms, boots and tents -- was targeted at Sudan. The Pentagon and CIA considered Sudan to be second only to Iran as a staging ground for international terrorism. CIA Director John Deutch made a 3-day visit to the Ethiopian capital in April 1996, where he noted that funds had been significantly increased for a more activist policy including preemptive strikes against terrorists and their sponsors. Reportedly several Operational Detachments-Alpha (also called A-Teams) of the US army were operating in support of the SPLA.


    Sources and Resources
    SPLM Today the official web site of the SPLM/A
    Sudan Tribune
    sudan.net
    South Sudan Online: ReliefWeb

    Prolonged Wars: The War in Sudan Barnabas L. Wama; John R. Reese (Faculty Advisor) Air Command and Staff College 1997 - The struggle has become prolonged far beyond either side's desire to continue, with polarization so profound that neither side can end the contest without admitting defeat.
                  

01-15-2007, 09:24 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    With the exception of a fragile peace established by negotiations between southern Sudanese insurgents (the Anya Nya) and the Sudan government at Addis Ababa in 1972, and lasting until the resumption of the conflict in 1983, southern Sudan has been a battlefield. The north-south distinction and the hostility between the two regions of Sudan is grounded in religious conflict as well as a conflict between peoples of differing culture and language. The language and culture of the north are based on Arabic and the Islamic faith, whereas the south has its own diverse, mostly non-Arabic languages and cultures -- with few exceptions non-Muslim, and its religious character was indigenous (traditional or Christian).

    The origins of the civil war in the south date back to the 1950s. On August 18, 1955, the Equatoria Corps, a military unit composed of southerners, mutinied at Torit. Rather than surrender to Sudanese government authorities, many mutineers disappeared into hiding with their weapons, marking the beginning of the first war in southern Sudan. By the late 1960s, the war had resulted in the deaths of about 500,000 people. Several hundred thousand more southerners hid in the forests or escaped to refugee camps in neighboring countries. By 1969 the rebels had developed foreign contacts to obtain weapons and supplies. Israel, for example, trained Anya Nya recruits and shipped weapons via Ethiopia and Uganda to the rebels. Anya Nya also purchased arms from Congolese rebels. Government operations against the rebels declined after the 1969 coup, and ended with the Addis Ababa accords of 1972 which guaranteed autonomy for the southern region.

    The civil war resumed in 1983 when President Nimeiri imposed Shari'a law, and has resulted in the death of more than 1.5 million Sudanese since through 1997. The principal insurgent faction is the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), a body created by the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). The SPLA was formed in 1983 when Lieutenant Colonel John Garang of the SPAF was sent to quell a mutiny in Bor of 500 southern troops who were resisting orders to be rotated to the north. Instead of ending the mutiny, Garang encouraged mutinies in other garrisons and set himself at the head of the rebellion against the Khartoum government. Garang, a Dinka born into a Christian family, had studied at Grinnell College, Iowa, and later returned to the United States to take a company commanders' course at Fort Benning, Georgia, and again to earn advanced economics degrees at Iowa State University. By 1986 the SPLA was estimated to have 12,500 adherents organized into twelve battalions and equipped with small arms and a few mortars. By 1989 the SPLA's strength had reached 20,000 to 30,000; by 1991 it was estimated at 50,000 to 60,000.

    Since 1983, the SPLA has been divided into 3 main factions: the SPLA Torit faction led by John Garang; the SPLA Bahr-al-Ghazal faction led by Carabino Kuany Bol; and the South Sudan Independence Movement led by Rick Machar. These internal divisions have intensified fighting in the south, hampering any potential peace settlement. The SPLA remains the principal military force in the insurgency.

    In April 1997 the South Sudan Independence Movement/Army (SSIM/A), which broke away from the SPLA, and several smaller southern factions concluded a peace agreement with the Government. These former insurgent elements then formed the United Democratic Salvation Front (UDSF). However, the SPLM, its armed wing, the SPLM/A, and most independent analysts have regarded the April 21 Agreement as a tactical government effort to enlist southerners on its side. The SPLM/A and its northern allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) carried out successful military offensives in areas along the borders with Ethiopia and Eritrea and in large parts of the south during the year. Neither side appears to have the ability to win the war militarily.

    In 1996 the US government decided to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the 'front-line' states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime. US officials denied that the military aid for the SPLA and the Sudanese Allied Forces (SAF), described as 'non-lethal' -- including radios, uniforms, boots and tents -- was targeted at Sudan. The Pentagon and CIA considered Sudan to be second only to Iran as a staging ground for international terrorism. CIA Director John Deutch made a 3-day visit to the Ethiopian capital in April 1996, where he noted that funds had been significantly increased for a more activist policy including preemptive strikes against terrorists and their sponsors. Reportedly several Operational Detachments-Alpha (also called A-Teams) of the US army were operating in support of the SPLA.


    Sources and Resources
    SPLM Today the official web site of the SPLM/A
    Sudan Tribune
    sudan.net
    South Sudan Online: ReliefWeb

    Prolonged Wars: The War in Sudan Barnabas L. Wama; John R. Reese (Faculty Advisor) Air Command and Staff College 1997 - The struggle has become prolonged far beyond either side's desire to continue, with polarization so profound that neither side can end the contest without admitting defeat.
                  

01-16-2007, 09:12 AM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: JOK BIONG)

    جوك
    ماحدث في أبيي للوحده الإداريه من إقتحاك وتدمير دعوه صريحه لمنهج العنف في معالجة القضايا الوطنيه وهذا شيء قبيح ومرفوض تماماً ........

    أما بالنسبه لمفوضية أبيي والخبراء كان لديهم تفويض معين عن البحث في تاريخ الدينكا نقوك سنة خمسه فذهبوا وفتشوا تاريخ دينكا نقوك في أبيي سنة 56 ده كلام ده ياأخوانا ......
                  

01-16-2007, 10:01 AM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    أخ جوك كما أوردت الأخبار منسوبي الحركه الشعبيه من دينكا نقوك أنزلوا كل اللافتات التي تحمل إسم ولاية جنوب كردفان ووضعوا بدلها لافتات تحمل إسم السودان الجديد .......

    المسيريه الى الان يلتزمون الصمت واكتفوا برفع مذكره للسيد الرئيس .....

    النائب سلفاكير وكما يعلم الجميع أخ جوك ظل ولمدة 6 شهور غائباً وكأنه عين نائباً على نفسه وليس نائباً لرئيس حكومة السودان وهذا هو سبب التأخير في حل مشكلة أبيي حتى الان .......

    عقلية الحرب وقانون الغابه هذا لابد أن يدرك الجميع أن زمنه قد ولى وهذا عصر السلام ولابد أن تحل كل القضايا عن طريق التفاوض السوي بدلاً من هذا النهج الذي يصرف الجميع عن إيجاد حلول سليمه ومنطقيه وكل هذه التصرفات تعتبر تهرب من مناقشة قضية أبيي مناقشه منطقيه بوضع إتفاق نيفاشا كخلفيه ملزمه للطرفين .........
                  

01-17-2007, 05:49 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: هذه هي حقيقة ما جرى في أبيي
    طالعتنا الصحف السودانية هذا الصباح (16/1/2007) تحمل عناوين مختلفة عن موضوع أبيي فيها من كان موضوعيا وتناول بعضها الموضوع بصورة مضخمة ومتجاوزة للحقائق التي هي على الأرض ، فمنها من قال أن هناك إعتداء بالسلاح وإغلاق الأسواق وطرد العرب ، وهذا ليس من الحقيقة في شئ فما حدث في صبيحة الرابع عشر من شهر يناير هو أن مجموعة من أبناء الدينكا تجمهرت حول الوحدة الإدارية بأبيي وأغلقوا الأبواب بالأقفال وكتبوا على ورق تم إستلام الوحدة الإدارية من قبل قطاعات المجتمع المدني بأبيي وتم التوقيع من قبل الإدارة الأهلية (عنها أروب كوال كون)، إتحاد الشباب عنه ( شول فور شول)، إتحاد المرأة عنه (أكور كويط) ، المثقفين عنهم( كوال منتوج) . كما تم مسح اللافتة القديمة وكتب مكانها ( جمهورية السودان – وليس جمهورية السودان الجديد_ كما جاء في الصحف ثم رئاسة الجمهورية / منطقة أبيي / الوحدة الإدارية ) .
    عند المساء تمت الدعوة إلى ما سمي مؤتمرا صحفيا لم تحضره الصحافة نسبة لعدم وجود صحف في أبيي وتحدث فيه مجموعة من أبناء الدينكا من بينهم الأمير كوال دينق مجوك ، موضحا أن ما تم لا علاقة له بالعرب ولكن هي خطوة نرى أنها ضرورية لضمان حقنا في إيرادات المدينة بعد أن تعود المدير التنفيذي إرسالها إلى المجلد وأن أبيي لا تتبع لجنوب كردفان حتى ترسل إيراداتها إلى جنوب كردفان ، مبينا أن هذا القرار تم بعلم الجهات الأمنية من القوات المسلحة والحركة الشعبية والشرطة وجهاز الأمن .
    إذن ليست هناك إعتداءات على العرب وإغلاق للأسواق فسوق أبيي إستمر كالمعتاد واليوم هو اليوم الثالث ولا شئ حدث يعكر الأمن في المدينة سوى ضرب أحد أبناء المسيرية من بعض الجنود التابعين إلى القوات المشتركة بعد أن أعادوه عندما غادر المدينة بماشيته بعد علمه بغلق سوق الماشية لذلك اليوم ، ولكن حتى الآن لا نعلم السبب الذي ضرب فيه وهذا أمرا فرديا تتم فيه التحريات والإجراءات القانونية المتبعة . ما نود تأكيده أن على الصحافة أن تنقل الحقائق كما هي دون تحريف وتضخيم ونحن كسكان لهذه المنطقة من العرب المسيرية نعتبر ما حدث تصرف من قبل الدينكا قد يكون فيه نقص في جوانب ولكن إثارة الفتن مسألة ستضر بنا نحن أبناء المسيرية والدينكا نقوك ، لذلك نقول لمن له أجندة يحاول تمريرها عبر خلافنا نرجو أن تبحث عن وسيلة أخرى ، فصراعات المؤتمر الوطني والحركة الشعبية لن نسمح أن يدفع ثمنها أهلنا البسطاء من المسيرية والدينكا نقوك ، ونقول أن الشريكين هما المسئولين عما يجري في هذه المنطقة من توترات، فما هو السبب الذي أجل حسم موضوع أبيي وتنفيذ برتوكولها لأكثر من عامين من توقيعه؟؟ وكفاكم متاجرة بأرواح الأبرياء وأتقوا الله في رعاياكم.

    كباشي المسيري
                  

01-17-2007, 05:43 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    الاخ
    محمد فرح
    لن تحدث حرب بين الدينكا والبقارة مرة اخرى حول اي منطقة!!انتم الجلابة تخلقون الفتنة في المنطقة بسبب حقدكم الدفينة بوجود النفط هناك . جاكم الرد من شباب المجلد بطرد ممثلي المؤتمر الوطني اللذين يزرعون الفتنة بين اهل المنطقة من الدينكا والبقارة.
    جوك
                  

01-16-2007, 10:04 AM

أبو الحسين
<aأبو الحسين
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-07-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 7948

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Quote: شهدت مدينة أبيي تطورات خطيره جداً حيث إحتلت مجموعه من أبناء دينكا أبيي صباح أمس الوحده الإداريه والمرافق الحكوميه وطردوا منها الموظفين وأنزلوا اللافتات ورفعوا أخرى كتبوا عليها (جمهورية السودان الجديد)


    لطفك بالبلد ياااااااااااارب...
                  

01-16-2007, 11:18 AM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: أبو الحسين)

    Quote: لطفك بالبلد ياااااااااااارب...


    الغالي أبو الحسين المسيريه الى الان يلتزمون الصمت لكن إذا حدث صدام وهذا ماأتوقعه وأتمنى أن يكون ظني في غير محله فليحفظ الله البلاد وأبيي خصوصاً من نذر حرب أهليه لاتبقي ولاتذر .....

    والله يكضب الشينه
                  

01-17-2007, 07:05 PM

JOK BIONG
<aJOK BIONG
تاريخ التسجيل: 11-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 5393

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    Resolving the Boundary Dispute in Sudan's Abyei Region
    By Dorina Bekoe, Kelly Campbell and Nicholas Howenstein
    October 2005

    The Arab Misseriya and the Ngok Dinka ethnic groups have long held competing claims for access to the cattle grazing pastures and resources of the oil-rich Abyei region in Sudan. Unable to resolve the dispute during negotiations on the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), the government and southern representatives agreed to the establishment of the Abyei Boundary Commission (ABC) and tasked it with evaluating historical and conflicting claims to the land and demarcating a border between the groups. The final report of the ABC was completed in July 2005, but the Government of Sudan has yet to publicly release the document or accept its findings, as stipulated in the CPA. The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), in contrast, supports the release of the ABC’s findings. While the decision by the Government of Sudan to remain silent on the ABC report is unlikely to derail the peace process, releasing the findings of the ABC, one of the first steps in the CPA’s implementation process, is an important component of the government’s credibility to abide by its commitments in the peace agreement.

    On August 30, 2005, the U.S. Institute of Peace convened its Sudan Peace Forum to discuss the implications of the commission’s report for the Abyei area, the future of the CPA, and the peace process in Sudan. The ABC Chairman, Ambassador Donald Petterson, addressed the forum to provide details about the commission’s mandate, evaluation process and decisions; and Dr. David Smock, director of the Religion and Peacemaking Initiative at the Institute, provided insights regarding the changed political environment in Sudan. The Sudan Peace Forum is chaired by Ambassadors Chester Crocker and Francis Deng.1 The following USIPeace Briefing summarizes the presentations by Petterson and Smock as well as the discussion at the meeting.

    The Abyei Boundary Commission
    The Abyei area is commonly regarded as the bridge between the north and south of Sudan. The Misseriya and the Ngok Dinka have shared resources and cattle grazing areas in Abyei since the 18th century when both groups occupied Kordofan province. More formally, in 1905, during the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium period, the British transferred the administration of the nine Ngok chiefdoms from Bahr el-Ghazal province to Kordofan. However, the arming of the Misseriya by the Government of Sudan during the first civil war and the alignment of the Ngok Dinka with the SPLM sparked the modern day dispute over which group could rightfully claim the Abyei territory. As the fighting resulted in the displacement of the Ngok Dinka from the area at the end of the second civil war, the Misseriya considered Abyei as their own – a claim bitterly contested by the Dinka.2

    Fully resolving the Abyei border issues in the CPA proved impossible, but in May 2004 the Government of Sudan and the SPLM adopted an American proposal that became the Abyei Protocol. To resolve the border issues, the Protocol established the ABC to “define and demarcate the area of the nine Ngok Dinka chiefdoms transferred to Kordofan in 1905” (CPA: 68). The text also instructed the ABC to present its report to the President of Sudan, who would in turn “take necessary action to put the special administrative status of the Abyei Area into immediate effect” (CPA: 68). Significantly, the Protocol also clearly explained the distribution of oil revenues during the interim period: 50 percent to the Government of Sudan; 42 percent to the Government of Southern Sudan; and 2 percent each to Bahr el-Ghazal, Western Kordofan, and local Ngok Dinka and Misseriya.

    In December 2004, the Government of Sudan and the SPLM adopted an Annex to the original Abyei Protocol outlining the composition of the commission: five chosen by the government, five by southern Sudan, and five impartial experts, three of whom would be appointed by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development and one each appointed by the United States and the United Kingdom. The five experts were: Godfrey Muriuki, University of Nairobi; Kassahun Berhanu, University of Addis Ababa; Douglas Johnson, expert on southern Sudan; Shadrack Gutto, lawyer from South Africa; and Donald Petterson, former ambassador to Sudan. Only these five impartial experts were to present the report, which the Annex asserted would be “final and binding on the Parties” (CPA: 217).

    These appointed experts were charged by the Annex with listening to representatives from the Ngok Dinka and Misseriya groups and consulting British archives and other sources to ensure that the ABC’s decision was “based on scientific analysis and research” (CPA: 217). After meeting with the representatives of the Government of Sudan and the SPLM in Nairobi in April 2005, the five commissioners traveled to the Abyei area to hear from the Ngok and Misseriya. Both the Government of Sudan and the Misseriya testified that the Ngok chiefdoms of 1905 were south of the Bahr El-Arab River; that the Misseriya settled permanently in the Abyei area long before the Ngok arrived; and that the Misseriya actually invited the Ngok to the region. The Ngok and the SPLM, however, asserted that the Ngok chiefdoms were both north and south of the river, and that present Ngok settlements are north and south as well. Much of the locals’ testimony was so similar to that of the government and the SPLM that the experts concluded both the Misseriya and Ngok Dinka had been coached, and turned instead to historical records to determine the boundaries of Abyei.

    The commissioners spent two weeks examining documents at the National Records Office and University of Khartoum and studying maps at the Sudan National Survey Authority. They found no maps depicting the Ngok Dinka chiefdoms’ territory around 1905, and no written descriptions noting which groups possessed what land. After continuing research in Nairobi and England, the ABC heard once more from the Government of Sudan and the SPLM before arriving at its decision. On July 14, 2005, five days after the interim government was sworn in, the commission presented its findings to President Omar Bashir.

    Summary of the ABC's Findings
    Below are excerpts from the ABC’s conclusions, as related by Petterson.

    In 1905 there was no clearly demarcated boundary of the area transferred from Bahr el-Ghazal to Kordofan.
    The GOS [Government of Sudan] belief that the area of the nine Ngok Dinka chiefdoms placed under the authority of Kordofan in 1905 lay entirely south of the Bahr el-Arab is mistaken. It is based largely on a report by a British official who incorrectly concluded that he had reached the Bahr el-Arab when in fact he had only come to the Ragaba ez-Zarga/Ngol.
    The Ngok claim that their boundary with the Misseriya should run from Lake Keilak to Muglad has no foundation.
    The historical record and environmental factors refute the Misseriya contention that their territory extended well to the south of the Bahr el-Arab, an area to which they never made a formal claim during the Condominium period.
    Although the Misseriya have clear “secondary” (seasonal) grazing rights to specific locations north and south of Abyei Town, their allegation that they have “dominant” (permanent) rights to these places is not supported by documentary or material evidence.
    There is compelling evidence to support the Ngok claims to having dominant rights to areas along the Bahr el-Arab and Ragaba ez-Zarga.
    The administrative record of the Condominium period and testimony of persons familiar with the area attest to the continuity of Ngok Dinka settlements in…places north of the Bahr el-Arab between 1905 and 1965.
    The border zone between the Ngok and Misseriya falls in the middle of the Goz, roughly between latitudes 10°10’ N and 10°35’ N. [Note that some consider the Goz, which is not suitable for cattle grazing, as the natural boundary between the two groups].
    Taking these facts into consideration, Petterson reported that the ABC concluded the following:

    The Ngok have a legitimate dominant claim to the territory from the Kordofan–Bahr el-Ghazal boundary north to latitude 10°10’ N, stretching from the boundary with Darfur to the boundary with Upper Nile.
    North of latitude 10°10’ N, through the Goz up to and including Tebeldia (north of latitude 10°35’ N) the Ngok and Misseriya share secondary rights.
    The two parties lay equal claim to the shared areas and accordingly it is reasonable and equitable to divide the Goz between them and locate the northern boundary in a straight line at approximately latitude 10°22’30” N.
    The Ngok and Misseriya shall retain their established secondary rights to the use of land north and south of this boundary.
    Aftermath of the Report: Reactions and Implications
    The Misseriya rejected the commission’s decision, as did President Bashir a few days later. Both claim the commission exceeded its mandate and thus assert that the report should only be considered as a recommendation to the president, who has the final say. Salva Kiir, First Vice President of Sudan and President of Southern Sudan, like his predecessor John Garang, has countered that the ABC fulfilled its mandate and adheres to the Annex of the Protocol—signed by the Government of Sudan and the SPLM—which says the report is not contestable. The Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Sudan, Jan Pronk, adopted this view on July 15, just after the ABC presented its report, reiterating both parties’ agreement to the binding nature of the commission’s report. As of October 2005, President Bashir had not acted on the committee’s decisions or publicized the ABC report, both of which he is obligated to do by the Abyei Protocol and its Annex.

    Deng pointed out more serious implications of the rejection of the ABC report. In particular, he noted that lines on a map are not the concern of local Misseriya or Ngok. Rather, access to water and grazing lands are the concern of locals, while the discovery of oil in the Ngok Dinka region lies behind the government’s actions. According to Deng, “fiddling with the report of the ABC would be tantamount to fiddling with the CPA, and that would almost certainly lead to the resumption of hostilities.” He warned that the Misseriya threatened to initiate a war with the Ngok and appeared to be mobilizing, apparently with the support of the Government of Sudan. The Ngok may in turn prepare for war.

    Petterson emphasized that the international community has an important role to play in resolving this impasse over Abyei. Specifically, he recommended that the United States, Britain, Norway, the United Nations and other parties make it clear to the Government of Sudan that they must adhere to the Abyei Protocol, the Annex and other signed documents. Deng concurred, believing that the international community “must reaffirm its support to the final and binding nature of the ABC report as part and parcel of the CPA.” He encouraged members of the ABC to publicly explain their mandate, procedures and decision-making processes, which Petterson and other Commission members have begun to do. One of the international members of the Commission explained to Deng that in its findings, “[The Commission] gave neither side any more or less than what the boundary was in 1905. Both sides retain established mutual practices of enjoying limited rights across the border as we established it, without asserting ‘ownership.’ This conforms to the spirit and letter of the CPA.”

    Although the impasse on the question of Abyei is serious, there was not consensus that it would unravel the peace process in Sudan. There are a number of concrete factors that show the government’s commitment to reconciliation, and Salva Kiir has stated his commitment to national unity. As Smock related, the inter-religious workshop recently organized by the Sudan Inter-Religious Council and the Institute of Peace permitted meaningful discussion among sixty religious leaders from the North and the South for the first time. The recommendations adopted at the workshop have been disseminated in the Northern and Southern Sudanese media. Similarly, for the first time since 1975, the Sudanese government issued three permits for the construction of churches in Khartoum. Finally, in small towns, like Rank at the border of North and South Sudan, residents note the decreased tension in their daily lives since the signing of the CPA. In this spirit, there are other, equally significant actions that can help alleviate the tension in Abyei and affirm and strengthen ties between the Ngok Dinka and Misseriya. Specifically, Deng recommended initiating a dialogue between the two to prevent renewed hostilities; establishing the administration for Abyei as called for in the CPA; and distributing the oil revenues to demonstrate the reality of the peace dividend.
                  

01-18-2007, 08:41 AM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    الأخ جوك الحكومه بذلت كل جهدها لإحقاق هذا السلام والجميع يعلم أن الإتفاقيه أعطت الحركه الشعبيه أكثر مما كانت تحلم به من حكم ذاتي ومناصب رئاسيه وحق في البترول وخلافه كثير جداً جداً وكل هذا لتحقيق السلام الذي هو منية وأمل كل الشعب السوداني الطيب الذي مل من الحرب التي أكلت كل قوته وأحلامه وأحلام أطفاله في وطن صحيح يمكن للمرء أن يحيا به حياة كريمه .......

    نيفاشا وكالعاده وكما تقول المقوله الشهيره أن الشيطان دائماً مايكمن في التفاصيل أتت بالكثير من الألغام في داخلها مما ينذر بإمكانية إنفجار الإتفاقيه في أية لحظه وضياع جهود الراحل قرنق في مهب الريح ولايمكن لقرنق أن يستريح في قبره إذا رأى الإتفاقيه والسلام الذي بذل من أجله كل حياته يذهب أدراج الرياح ........

    بروتكول أبيي أعتقد أنه من تدبير الخبيث دانفورث فهو يعطي لدينكا نقوك تسع مشيخات بينما لايعطي للمسيريه سوى حق الرعي والمرور وهذا في رأيي لهو الظلم كل الظلم ......

    ينص برويكول أبيي على الاتي (سكان أبيي هم أبناء الدينكا نقوك والسودانيون الاخرون الذين يقيمون بالمنطقه) وأرجو التركيز على ماتحته خط.....

    الخبراء هم من أرادوا إعطاء الحق لغير أهله كما تجاوزوا التفويض الذي أعطي لهم ولاأدري لماذا...

    الان أبيي تعتبر قنبله يمكن أن تنفجر في أية لحظه ولابد من المزيد من الحوار لحل هذه القضيه ويكفي الحركه ماحققته من مكاسب ......
                  

01-18-2007, 11:28 AM

محمد فرح
<aمحمد فرح
تاريخ التسجيل: 09-14-2006
مجموع المشاركات: 9222

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: فتيل الحرب يشتعل في أبيي (الدينكا يحتلون المؤسسات الحكوميه ويغلقون السوق) (Re: محمد فرح)

    جيمس أجبنق : أعلن تأييدي المطلق لما حدث

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    في لقاء صحفي مع السيد جيمس أجينق ذكر أنه يؤيد ماحدث كما ذكر أن من إحتلوا الوحده الإداريه من منظمات المجتمع المدني وأنهم إحتجوا على عدم تنفيذ بروتكول أبيي بعد مرور عامين من توقيع الإتفاقيه .

    أنشر هنا بعضاً من نص الحوار ....
    أما كان من الأجدى مناقشة الأمر بدلاً من إفتعال المشاكل وتأزيم الموقف ؟
    - انا أعتقد أن تسلم الرجال للمنطقه ليس إفتعال مشاكل ّّّالموضوع نوقش لفتره عامين كاملين على جميع المستويات والمؤتمر الوطني متماطل في التنفيذ في الوقت أنهم وقعوا على إتفاق ملزم ...
    !!!!!!!!!

    هل نفهم أن الحركه مؤيده لما حدث بالمنطقه؟
    -الحركه لاتؤيد لأنها ليست طرفاً لكنني كنائب ممثل للدائره أؤيد هذه الخطوه لأن المواطنين تعبانين .
    !!!!!!!!!!!!

    لكنك ممثل الحركه في البرلمان ورأيك لاينفصل عن رأي الحركه إذاً الحركه موافقه؟
    - طبعاً معروف أن هناك مواقف رسميه من الحركه الشعبيه وهناك مواقف أفراد وهذا موقف شخصي أؤكد أن ماحدث الحركه لاعلاقه لها به .
                  


[رد على الموضوع] صفحة 1 „‰ 1:   <<  1  >>




احدث عناوين سودانيز اون لاين الان
اراء حرة و مقالات
Latest Posts in English Forum
Articles and Views
اخر المواضيع فى المنبر العام
News and Press Releases
اخبار و بيانات



فيس بوك تويتر انستقرام يوتيوب بنتيريست
الرسائل والمقالات و الآراء المنشورة في المنتدى بأسماء أصحابها أو بأسماء مستعارة لا تمثل بالضرورة الرأي الرسمي لصاحب الموقع أو سودانيز اون لاين بل تمثل وجهة نظر كاتبها
لا يمكنك نقل أو اقتباس اى مواد أعلامية من هذا الموقع الا بعد الحصول على اذن من الادارة
About Us
Contact Us
About Sudanese Online
اخبار و بيانات
اراء حرة و مقالات
صور سودانيزاونلاين
فيديوهات سودانيزاونلاين
ويكيبيديا سودانيز اون لاين
منتديات سودانيزاونلاين
News and Press Releases
Articles and Views
SudaneseOnline Images
Sudanese Online Videos
Sudanese Online Wikipedia
Sudanese Online Forums
If you're looking to submit News,Video,a Press Release or or Article please feel free to send it to [email protected]

© 2014 SudaneseOnline.com

Software Version 1.3.0 © 2N-com.de