اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع التوليد النووي

مرحبا Guest
اخر زيارك لك: 05-07-2024, 10:39 AM الصفحة الرئيسية

منتديات سودانيزاونلاين    مكتبة الفساد    ابحث    اخبار و بيانات    مواضيع توثيقية    منبر الشعبية    اراء حرة و مقالات    مدخل أرشيف اراء حرة و مقالات   
News and Press Releases    اتصل بنا    Articles and Views    English Forum    ناس الزقازيق   
مدخل أرشيف للعام 2018م
نسخة قابلة للطباعة من الموضوع   ارسل الموضوع لصديق   اقرا المشاركات فى صورة مستقيمة « | »
اقرا احدث مداخلة فى هذا الموضوع »
08-29-2018, 06:17 PM

Hassan Farah
<aHassan Farah
تاريخ التسجيل: 08-29-2016
مجموع المشاركات: 9166

للتواصل معنا

FaceBook
تويتر Twitter
YouTube

20 عاما من العطاء و الصمود
مكتبة سودانيزاونلاين
Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت (Re: محمد بشير عبادى)

    Nuclear energy has no place in a safe, clean, sustainable future. Nuclear energy is both expensive and dangerous, and just because nuclear pollution is invisible doesn't mean it's clean. Renewable energy is better for the environment, the economy, and doesn't come with the risk of a nuclear meltdown.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Andreas Wilson-Späth
    South Africa
    reasons why building new nuclear power plants is a bad idea
    2016-01-11 10:18
    The South African government seems intent on pushing through its plans to build a fleet of new nuclear power stations regardless of mounting public criticism and opposition. The most recent sign that nukes remain a firm national policy target was the publication of a document spelling out that “9 600 megawatts (MW) should be procured to be generated from nuclear energy”, which appeared in the Government Gazette a few days before Christmas.

    Alas, atomic energy remains a poor option for South Africa for a number of compelling reasons. Here are some of them in no particular order:

    1. It’s too expensive

    The nuclear industry involves prohibitively high capital costs, for example for constructing new reactor facilities. The government’s current procurement plan is estimated to cost more than a trillion rand. Given our nose-diving currency and past experiences from other countries who have embarked on new nuclear build projects, this already humongous figure is likely to turn out to be a severe underestimate.

    Atomic energy operators have historically been recipients of large government subsidies. The technology is ‘mature’ and unlikely to see future drops in costs. Renewable energy alternatives, by contrast, are constantly becoming more affordable. Nuclear fission is not a renewable source of energy. The world’s uranium reserves are limited and will become increasingly scarce and expensive.

    2. It’s too dangerous

    The consequences of the disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima are stark reminders of the safety risks nuclear power plants represent. There is no guarantee that similar or worse accidents will not happen in the future.

    In addition, the nuclear energy industry has long-standing ties to the atomic weapons business. South Africa’s past experience in this regard remains a particularly relevant example. Proliferation of nuclear arms continues to be a global problem, specifically in countries that have an active nuclear energy programme. Why else would Iran’s plans for atomic power have been such a hot geopolitical issue for so long؟

    At various points along its entire value chain, from enrichment to power generation, the nuclear energy industry remains vulnerable to terrorist attacks.

    3. It’s too secretive

    Because of safety and security concerns, generating nuclear energy is undemocratic by definition and requires tight, centralised and secretive state and corporate control. The tender and procurement process for South Africa’s proposed new nuclear programme has been anything but transparent and open to public scrutiny. In this environment, opportunities for shady back-room dealings, financial ‘incentives’ to strategically positioned individuals and outright bribery abound. Some of us have not yet forgotten the arms deal shenanigans.

    4. It’s too dirty

    Nuclear power stations generate high-level waste that stays dangerously radioactive for many thousands of years and for which no safe, long-term storage solution has yet been found anywhere in the world. All of the high-level waste produced at Koeberg over the years, for instance, remains in storage at the power plant itself.

    Mining and processing uranium comes with very serious health risks for those involved as well as neighbouring communities, while also producing mountains of radioactive tailings and large quantities of contaminated liquids which represent major environmental threats.

    5. It’s too slow

    Government claims that reducing carbon emissions is a major reason for its plans to go nuclear. But building new nuclear power plants will take too long – decades – at a time when we desperately need clean, low-carbon energy to effectively counteract global warming. Renewable energy technologies can provide this much more speedily.

    6. It’s outdated

    Producing electricity by nuclear fission represents outdated 20th century technology. Investing time and money – and lots of both – in this dinosaur industry comes with significant and damaging opportunity costs that undermine our ability to make progress with real solutions. The future of electricity generation is renewable.

    7. The environmental impact assessment is flawed

    In its submission to GIBB Consultants, the firm facilitating the environmental impact assessment process for South Africa’s proposed new nuclear build programme, the anti-nuclear Koeberg Alert Alliance spells out some of the more glaring problems with the process (full disclosure: I’m a member of this organisation and contributed to the submission). Among other things, the document highlights concerns about the lack of consideration given to the earthquake risk at the Koeberg site, a misrepresentation of South Africa’s projected future electricity demand, and criticisms about the veracity of some of the specialists scientific studies that form part of the draft environmental impact report, which is described as “incomplete”, “biased” and “inadequate”.

    8. We have better alternatives

    Renewable sources of energy, especially solar and wind power, are capable of providing cheap, clean and safe electricity much more quickly than newly build nuclear reactors would.

    The claim that we need atomic energy as part of a mix of power sources is fallacious. A number of studies have shown that renewables have the potential to provide most if not all of our electricity needs.

    Nuclear power is redundant in the 21st century.






















                  

العنوان الكاتب Date
اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع التوليد النووي محمد بشير عبادى08-28-18, 00:15 AM
  Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت بكرى ابوبكر08-28-18, 01:08 AM
    Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد على طه الملك08-28-18, 01:23 AM
      Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد على طه الملك08-28-18, 01:59 AM
        Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت عبدالله الشقليني08-28-18, 10:47 AM
  Yassir Mahgoub08-28-18, 11:19 AM
    Re: الامين محمد علي08-28-18, 01:35 PM
      Re: Abdullah Idrees08-28-18, 02:07 PM
      Re: Asim Ali08-28-18, 02:23 PM
        Re: نعمات عماد08-28-18, 03:33 PM
          Re: Mahjob Abdalla08-28-18, 03:44 PM
            Re: Mahjob Abdalla08-28-18, 03:47 PM
              Re: Mahjob Abdalla08-28-18, 03:55 PM
                Re: Asim Ali08-28-18, 04:22 PM
  Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت ابراهيم عبد الوهاب08-28-18, 04:37 PM
    Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Asim Ali08-28-18, 04:46 PM
      Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت ابراهيم عبد الوهاب08-28-18, 04:58 PM
        Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Asim Ali08-28-18, 05:29 PM
      Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Mahjob Abdalla08-28-18, 05:06 PM
        Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت احمد حمودى08-28-18, 05:18 PM
          Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت منتصر عبد الباسط08-28-18, 06:39 PM
            Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد البشرى الخضر08-28-18, 07:07 PM
              Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت عبدالعظيم عثمان08-28-18, 07:29 PM
  Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد بشير عبادى08-29-18, 12:23 PM
    Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد البشرى الخضر08-29-18, 03:35 PM
      Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت منتصر عبد الباسط08-29-18, 05:15 PM
  Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Hassan Farah08-29-18, 06:17 PM
    Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Deng08-29-18, 06:30 PM
      Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد بشير عبادى08-29-18, 06:44 PM
        Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت محمد فضل الله المكى08-30-18, 10:48 AM
          Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت Deng08-30-18, 11:04 AM
            Re: اجتياز السودان المرحلة الأولى لمشروع الت مهدي صلاح08-30-18, 11:23 AM


[رد على الموضوع] صفحة 1 „‰ 1:   <<  1  >>




احدث عناوين سودانيز اون لاين الان
اراء حرة و مقالات
Latest Posts in English Forum
Articles and Views
اخر المواضيع فى المنبر العام
News and Press Releases
اخبار و بيانات



فيس بوك تويتر انستقرام يوتيوب بنتيريست
الرسائل والمقالات و الآراء المنشورة في المنتدى بأسماء أصحابها أو بأسماء مستعارة لا تمثل بالضرورة الرأي الرسمي لصاحب الموقع أو سودانيز اون لاين بل تمثل وجهة نظر كاتبها
لا يمكنك نقل أو اقتباس اى مواد أعلامية من هذا الموقع الا بعد الحصول على اذن من الادارة
About Us
Contact Us
About Sudanese Online
اخبار و بيانات
اراء حرة و مقالات
صور سودانيزاونلاين
فيديوهات سودانيزاونلاين
ويكيبيديا سودانيز اون لاين
منتديات سودانيزاونلاين
News and Press Releases
Articles and Views
SudaneseOnline Images
Sudanese Online Videos
Sudanese Online Wikipedia
Sudanese Online Forums
If you're looking to submit News,Video,a Press Release or or Article please feel free to send it to [email protected]

© 2014 SudaneseOnline.com

Software Version 1.3.0 © 2N-com.de