31Authorized in 8/8/2015
halosuccinimides
This reaction can be achieved by a number of reagents, including
fluoromethyl hypofluorite (FCH2OF) cesium fluoroxysulfat (CsSO4F)
fluoroxytrifluoromethane (CF3OF) and acetyl hypofluorite
(CH3COOF).
5-Nitrouracil is most often synthesized by the direct C5-nitration
of uracil. This can be accomplished using reagents such as nitric acid
and sulfuric acid palladium(II) acetate and sodium nitrite copper(II)
nitrate and acetic anhydride and nitronium tetrafluoroborate
(NO2BF4).
Lastly, 5-(trifluoromethyl)uracil can be prepared by several methods,
including the direct C5-trifluoromethylation of uracil with aqueous
bis(trifluoromethyl) mercury in the presence of azoisobutyronitril
(AIBN). Unfortunately, this synthesis suffers from multiple
disadvantages such as low yields and the use of highly toxic
reagents. The superior synthesis of 5-(trifluoromethyl)uracil involves
the chlorination of thymine, first with phosphorus oxychloride in the
presence of a tertiary amine and then with elemental chlorine,
followed by fluorination with hydrogen fluoride and subsequent
hydrolysis using aqueous potassium or sodium fluoride. This method
is quite high yielding and used prominently in industry:
31
Authorized in 8/8/2015
The Synthesis of N-Substituted Uracils
The synthesis of N-substituted uracil analogues can also be
carried out through various methods of uracil ring formation if
appropriate starting materials, such as N-substituted urea or thiourea,
are used. However, it is difficult to achieve regioselectivity in this
fashion.
A more practical approach to N-substituted uracil analogue synthesis
is the direct N1 and/or N3-alkylation of uracils. It is believed that N1-H
of uracil is more acidic than N3-H, indicating that substitutions
involving the use of base and various alkyl halides should proceed
more readily at N1. While this is true in some cases, a mixture of N1
and N3 mono- and di substituted uracil products is often obtained.
The ratio between these three products is highly dependent on the
reaction conditions, the #####alents of substituting reagents used,
and the substituents already present on the starting uracil N1- or N3-
specific substitutions can be made more favorable by employing
uracil protecting groups (UPGs). An ideal UPG would be one that
directs alkylation completely to either N1 or N3, is stable enough to
withstand the substitution reaction conditions, and is labile enough to
be removed without difficulty after reaction completion. Many existing
UPGs are limited due to poor N-selectivity or harsh deprotection
steps, but an acceptable level of success has been achieved through
32
Authorized in 8/8/2015
the methods reviewed below.
N1-Directed Uracil Substitution:
The substitution of uracils at N1 can be facilitated by the direct
protection of N3, although UPGs that exclusively react with N3 are
uncommon. However, the N3- protection of some uracils can be
achieved indirectly. For example, when uracil is reacted with excess
benzoyl chloride, the N1,N3-dibenzoylated products initially obtained
can be quickly decomposed to their monosubstituted 3-benzoyl
derivatives via mildly basic conditions or chromatography on alumina
Alternatively, N1-substitution can be made more favorable through
the steric hindrance of N3-substitution. This can be accomplished by
protecting the uracil oxygen with bulky functionalities, such as the
trimethylsilyl group (figure 15). Bis(trimethylsilyl) acetamide (BSA) or
hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) and trimethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl) can
be used for the trimethylsilylation of uracils.
N3-Directed Uracil Substitution:
N3-substitution is primarily facilitated through the direct
protection of N1, A number of UPGs have been successfully used for
33
Authorized in 8/8/2015
the N1-protection of uracils, including the benzhydryl, 2-(trimethylsilyl)
ethoxymethyl (SEM), benzyl, benzyloxymethyl (BOM),
methylthiomethyl (MTM), and p-methoxybenzyl (PMB)
groups
34
Authorized in 8/8/2015
35
Authorized in 8/8/2015
36
Authorized in 8/8/2015