|
|
 الزولة دي كسبت في اللوتري 564 مليون دولار
|
04:26 PM Sep, 22 2015
سودانيز اون لاين
Osman Musa-
مكتبتى فى سودانيزاونلاين
ttery Win
651
SHARES
Email
A North Carolina woman was presented today with one of three winning tickets for one of the biggest Powerball lottery drawings.
Marie Holmes, 26, a single mother of four children ages 9 months to 7-years old, is the state's biggest Powerball winner.
The $564.1 million jackpot, which has a cash value of $381 million, is the fifth largest lottery prize in U.S. history. The jackpot had increased over two months without a winner, starting at $40 million.
Puerto Rico Claims Winning Ticket in $564M Powerball Drawing
Powerball: Texas Store Owner to Receive $1 Million for Selling Winning Ticket
Powerball: 5 Reasons You're Lucky You Don't Have Winning Numbers
"This is going to make a huge difference for them," Holmes said of her children. "They are going to be able to go to school and not worry about paying for it. They are going to live a comfortable life without struggling."
Holmes, who said she is a "full-time mother," said she's planning to continue her education in the nursing field while caring for her children. From Shallotte, North Carolina, she previously supported her children while working at Walmart, Food Lion, KFC, McDonald's and Subway restaurants.
"It was seven of us living in one home," she told reporters at a news conference. "It wasn't comfortable but we made do. Everybody in that household will have their own place, because I don't plan on staying there."
The occasional lottery player said the farthest she has traveled in the U.S. is Seattle and New York, but she's never left the country. She also said she is speaking with a financial adviser about the money, but she hopes to travel and give some money to a church, which she declined to name. She also hopes to give to an organization dedicated to cerebral palsy, because one of her children has the neurological disorder that affects muscle movement.
The Brunswick County resident presented one of the three winning tickets for the $564.1 million jackpot, the third-largest Powerball jackpot ever.
The largest Powerball jackpot was recorded on May 18, 2013, ultimately awarded to Gloria Mackenzie of Zephyrills, Florida.
PHOTO: Marie Holmes accepts her $188 million dollar check for winning the North Carolina Powerball, Feb. 23, 2015.WTVD
Marie Holmes accepts her $188 million dollar check for winning the North Carolina Powerball, Feb. 23, 2015.
North Carolina's largest jackpot winner matched all five white balls in the Feb. 11 Powerball drawing, giving her one-third of the prize.
The annuity payment provides $188 million, but she is choosing the $127 million lump sum.
Powerball is played in 44 states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The three tickets matched the numbers 25, 11, 54, 13 and 39, with a Powerball of 19. The odds of winning were about 175 million to one.
المحظوظة أم شابة جميلة من ولاية نورث كارولاينا .
(عدل بواسطة Osman Musa on 09-22-2015, 04:29 PM)
|
|
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: الزولة دي كسبت في اللوتري 564 مليون دولا (Re: Osman Musa)
|
زمان يا عبدالمنعم جيت لي البنجمينابي الشغالين معاهو في مانهاتن .
قلتلو الاسبوع ده اللوتري دقت ميتين مليون دحين حاول العب ليك تكت .
قال لي الميتين مليون عندي العب ليه .
قلتلو طيب وكتين الميتين عندك بتعيط السوق كعب السوق كعب مالك .
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: الزولة دي كسبت في اللوتري 564 مليون دولا (Re: Osman Musa)
|
اQuote: حكم اليانصيب التوتو، اللوتو، الونر، ماكنات القمار...)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
حكم اليانصيب التوتو، اللوتو، الونر، ماكنات القمار...)
س1: ما حكم المشاركة في ألعاب اليانصيب (وينر، توتو، لوتو، آلات القمار...) من الناحية الشرعية؟
الحمد لله رب العالمين والصلاة والسلام على رسولنا الأمين وبعد:
المشاركة في ألعاب اليانصيب بكافة أشكالها وأنواعها حرام شرعا؛ لأنها صورة من صور القمار. قال تعالى:{يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ إِنَّمَا الْخَمْرُ وَالْمَيْسِرُ وَالأَنصَابُ وَالأَزْلاَمُ رِجْسٌ مِّنْ عَمَلِ الشَّيْطَانِ فَاجْتَنِبُوهُ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ (90) إِنَّمَا يُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَن يُوقِعَ بَيْنَكُمُ الْعَدَاوَةَ وَالْبَغْضَاء فِي الْخَمْرِ وَالْمَيْسِرِ وَيَصُدَّكُمْ عَن ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ وَعَنِ الصَّلاَةِ فَهَلْ أَنتُم مُّنتَهُونَ}المائدة:90-91. والميسر هو القمار. والتحريم ظاهر بقوله تعالى:"فاجتنبوه"، أي لا يجوز اللعب والمشاركة في صور القمار، ويجب الابتعاد عن الأماكن التي تمارس فيها مثل هذه الألعاب.{انظر: زاد المسير(2/260)}.
والسنة النبوية أكدت تحريم القمار بقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم:"من قال لصاحبه تعال أقامرك فليتصدق".{متفق عليه}.
وعن جابر بن عبد الله رضي الله عنهما أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال:"لا يدخل الجنة لحم نبت من سحت".{رواه ابن حبان في صحيحه}
جاء في فتاوى الأزهر(7/259):"أوراق اليانصيب حرام لأنها نوع من أنواع القمار". وجاء في فتاوى اللجنة الدائمة- المحموعة الأولى(15/205):"اليانصيب نوع من القمار وهو الميسر، والمال الذي يؤخذ بسببه مال حرام".
وقد عرف البيجوري القمار في حاشيته(2/521) بقوله:"هو كل لعب تردد بين غرم وغنم". فالقمار هو كل لعب على مال أو غيره بين فريقين أو أكثر، متساويين في احتمال الخسارة، يأخذه الغالب من المغلوب.
{انظر: بدائع الصنائع(14/106)، شرح مختصر خليل للخرشي(10/191)، الجامع لابن رشد (ص336)، الشافعي في الأم(4/243)، المغني(11/131)}
س2: ما هي إسقاطات هذه الألعاب على الفرد والأسرة والمجتمع؟
المشاركة في ألعاب اليانصيب لها أثر سلبي على الفرد والأسرة والمجتمع، ويظهر هذا الأثر في النواحي التالية:
1-الإدمان عليها.
2-إضاعة الكثير من المال والوقت.
3-تربية النفس على الأوهام وتعطيل الأسباب الاقتصادية.
جاء في فتاوى الأزهر(7/223):"وإنما كان تحريم الميسر والقمار بعمومه لما فيه من المضار النفسية، إذ يعمل على إفساد التربية بتعويد النفس الكسل، والقعود عن طلب الرزق والسعي في سبيله انتظارا لقدومه بأسباب موهومة، وإضعاف القوة العقلية بترك الأعمال المفيدة في طرق الكسب الطبيعية.وإهمال المقامرين للزراعة والصناعة والتجارة التي هي أركان العمران.ولما فيه من المضار المالية، إذ يؤدى الميسر والقمار إلى تخريب البيوت والإفجأة بالتحول من الغنى إلى الفقر.والحوادث الكثيرة في المجتمع شاهدة على ذلك".
س3:كيف يتعامل الرابح مع أموال الجائزة؟
لا يجوز الانتفاع بأموال جائزة اليانصيب، ويجب التخلص من هذا المال فورا عن طريق التخلص منها لأي جهة خيرية. شأنه شأن المال الحرام في كيفية التخلص.
جاء في المجموع(9/351):"لا يجوز اتلاف هذا المال (أي المال الحرام) ورميه في البحر فلم يبق إلا صرفه في مصالح المسلمين".
قال القرضاوي عند حديثه عن كيفية التصرف في الفوائد الربوية في كتابه فتاوى معاصرة(2/382): "أما المشروع في هذا المقام، فهو دفع هذه الفوائد ومثلها كل مال من حرام في جهات الخير، كالفقراء والمساكين، واليتامي وابن السبيل، والجهاد في سبيل الله، ونشر الدعوة إلى الإسلام، وبناء المساجد والمراكز الإسلامية، وإعداد الدعاة الواعين، وطبع الكتب الإسلامية، وغير ذلك من ألوان البر، وسبل الخير".
س4: من المعروف أن اللجنة المسئولة عن هذه الألعاب تقوم بدعم وتنفيذ مشاريع جماهيرية تخدم المجتمع كبناء المدارس والمراكز الجماهيرية(بايس)، هل يغير هذا الأمر من النظرة والحكم الشرعي للتعامل مع هذه الألعاب؟
لا يؤثر في الحكم كون اللجنة المسئولة (بايس)، تقوم بمشاريع خيرية جماهيرية، والمعنى أن الاشتراك في اليانصيب حرام مع الوصف المذكور للّجنة؛ لأن الغاية لا تبرر الوسيلة في شريعتنا، فلا يصح للمرء أن يتاجر بالحرام لغرض بناء المساجد والقيام بالأعمال الخيرية الأخرى. فالغاية عندنا مشروعة وسامية وينبغي أن تكون الوسيلة كذلك.
وتصديقاً لذلك يقول المولى جل وعلا:{يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ أَنفِقُواْ مِن طَيِّبَاتِ مَا كَسَبْتُمْ وَمِمَّا أَخْرَجْنَا لَكُم مِّنَ الأَرْضِ وَلاَ تَيَمَّمُواْ الْخَبِيثَ مِنْهُ تُنفِقُونَ وَلَسْتُم بِآخِذِيهِ إِلاَّ أَن تُغْمِضُواْ فِيهِ وَاعْلَمُواْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ غَنِيٌّ حَمِيدٌ}البقرة:267.
يقول القرضاوي في كتابه فتاوى معاصرة(2/475):" إن الإسلام لا يقبل الوصول إلى الغايات الطيبة بالوسائل الخبيثة. إنه يرفض الفلسفة "الميكافيلية" التي ترى أن الغاية تبرر الوسيلة. بل يؤكد كل التأكيد أنه لا بد من اجتماع الأمرين: الغاية الشريفة والوسيلة النظيفة، ولهذا رفض جمع المال من طرق الحرام لينفق في الخيرات وأوجه الصدقات، وقال الرسول الكريم في ذلك: "إن الله طيب لا يقبل إلا طيبا"، وقال عليه الصلاة والسلام:"لا يقبل الله صلاة بغير طهور، ولا صدقة من غلول". رواه مسلم.
والغلول ما يؤخذ من مال الغنيمة خفية وخيانة، دون سائر المستحقين، فإذا أخذه ليتصدق به فإن الله يرده عليه ولا يقبل منه.
ولهذا فسر السلف العمل الصالح المقبول بأنه ما اجتمع فيه أمران: الخلوص والصواب، فلا يقبل العمل عند الله إلا إذا كان خالصًا صوابًا. وخلوصه أن يكون لله تعالى، وصوابه أن يكون على السنة، أي على ما شرعه المنهج النبوي الذي يمثل الصراط المستقيم ".
والله تعالى أعلم
المجلس الإسلامي للإفتاء
22 جمادى الأولى 1431هـ الموافق6/5/2010م
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: الزولة دي كسبت في اللوتري 564 مليون دولا (Re: عبد العزيز عبدالكريم نهار)
|
ناس القراضاوي ديل عاوزين الزولة دي تتبرع ليهم بالـ 564 مليون دولار لمنظماتهم الخيرية..
وفي نفس الوكت غيرهم بيقول أن الميسر بيعلم الكسل والتكاسل عن ذكر الله والإنجاز أو العمل!
طيب الواحد منهم تسألوا شغال شنو يقول ليك أنا شيخ أو داعية...
أها يا شيخنا الداعية... بتاكل منو وين وشنو دخلك البتصرف منو؟
يقول ليك أنا إمام مسجد وعضو إفتاء ومدير منظمة خيرية إسلامية...
ترجع تقول ليهو مصدر أموال المنظمة الخيرية الإسلاموية دي شنو؟
يعود ويقول ليك.. طبعاً من الهبات والتبرعات وخاصة من قروش الناس
الرفضت تدخل عليها القروش الحرام وقروش الربا والقمار واليانصيب!
يعني دي ساقية أخير منها ساقية جحا....
أي نعم هناك نصيب للعاملين عليها.. وهو نصيب معلوم ومحدد مقداره
بس خلونا نشوف نصيب العاملين عليها اليوم مقداره كم وحسابه كيف؟
هل في زول فيكم شاف مرتبات ناس المنظمات الخيرية الإسلامية دي كم؟
ولو زول شاف ليهو كشف مرتبات موثق من مراجع قانوني.. اليجيبو هنا؟
وإنا مستعد بعدها ألعب وأكسب وأربح وأتبرع لتلك المنظمات....
----------------------
إجتنبوه دي عندها تفاسير لغوية كتيرة..
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: الزولة دي كسبت في اللوتري 564 مليون دولا (Re: Osman Musa)
|
عزيزنا المترجم النيويوركاوي الكبير أستاذ محمد الخليفة
سلامات وكل عام ونهر الهيدسون يحمل اليكم الخير والبركات
ياخ طالبين منك محاولة ترجمة سطرين تلاتة من ده الكلام . وحدثنا شوية عن قوة وعظمة وحجم المال الحايم في بطن الولايات المتحدة
وأشرح لينا شوية عن تاريخ ال N A S P L . مع التحية وكتير الشكر
About NASPL
Resources
Events
Associate Memberships
Insights
NSINews
NASPL Seminars
HOME > About NASPL > NASPL History Text Size: A A Print This Page
NASPL History
The History of NASPL
The Formation of NASL
The North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries (NASPL) was founded in 1971 as the National Association of State Lotteries (NASL).
The advantages of lotteries exchanging information and working together were first recognized in 1969 during the implementation of the New Jersey State Lottery. To develop a lottery concept, which could be utilized as the framework for the New Jersey State Lottery Law, a planning commission was appointed by the Governor. Ralph Batch, a member of this commission and the first Executive Director of the New Jersey Lottery, was delegated to explore known sources for available data, which might be of assistance. To achieve this objective, Batch solicited the assistance of the existing lotteries in New Hampshire, New York, Québec and Puerto Rico.
These advantages were further reinforced just prior to the New Jersey start-up when the Federal Regulatory Agencies of the banking industry notified the Lottery that the procedures developed with the assistance of the New Jersey banking authorities were not in conformance with the federal statute, the net result being that all banks would be prohibited from participating in the Lottery program. Once again, the New Jersey Lottery turned to existing lotteries for important data, seeking and receiving information from New York and New Hampshire regarding their experience with the banking industry. An emergency meeting was held with government regulatory agencies, and a program allowing utilization of the banking network was approved for all existing and future U.S. lotteries
From this cooperative exchange of data, great benefit was derived not only by New Jersey, but other jurisdictions, as well. It became apparent to all involved that the exchange of information and the communication which naturally ensues among organizations with a common purpose not only enhances the efficiency of the individual lotteries, but also at the same time intensifies their defenses against contrary forces.
From this environment of mutual assistance, the National Association of State Lotteries (NASL) emerged. In September 1971, Edward Powers, Director of the New Hampshire Lottery, Ernest Byrd, Director of the New York Lottery, and Ralph Batch, Director of the New Jersey Lottery assembled at a resort hotel in New Hampshire. With an eye to the obvious fact that other states would eventually join the Association, Powers, Byrd and Batch created NASL with the following purpose:
To exchange information and ideas of mutual interest, particularly those that related to the integrity, security and efficiency of each state lottery;
To coordinate efforts to amend the federal statutes regulating state lotteries which unnecessarily restricted the abilities of state lotteries to operate and serve the public in an efficient manner.
To establish methods and procedures by which meetings of officials of state lotteries and a regular exchange of information could take place.
At the initial meeting, Batch was elected NASL President, Powers, Vice President and Byrd, Secretary/Treasurer. It was determined that the members would meet on a quarterly basis, attendance at closed NASL executive sessions would be limited to chief administrative officers, with no substitutes permitted and no guests would be allowed without prior approval of the majority of the membership. These precautions, with attendance restrictions, were to ensure an atmosphere of equal exchange and confidentiality. In fairness to all members, it was necessary to ensure that each attendee would be in a position to offer as much to the assembly as would be received.
1972-1974
When the Connecticut, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania Lotteries joined the Association in 1972, the Maryland Lottery in 1973, and Illinois, Maine, Rhode Island and Ohio in 1974, NASL started growing. When a concerted effort was launched by NASL, governors and congressional delegations from the lottery states, lottery commission members and other interested parties to make Congress aware of the unfair, archaic and discriminatory statutes affecting and prohibiting the sovereign states from raising much-needed revenue, the unified voice of state lotteries began to become evident.
Federal Commission for the Review of the National Policy on Gambling
In January 1974, the Federal Commission for the Review of the National Policy on Gambling met for the first time for the purpose of conducting research and establishing policy guidelines for the federal administration and Congress. Midway through the commission’s data-gathering process, it was discovered that the Commission’s projections for revenue-raising potential were grossly underestimated; and it became apparent that the study was not going to be as objective as had been hoped.
IRS
At the same time that the Commission’s impartiality was becoming questionable, the Internal Revenue Service was also seeking to establish withholding and special reporting requirements affecting state lotteries. This combined threat to the health and effectiveness of state lotteries once again rallied NASL members to the common cause of protecting themselves from the federal government. To assist in this effort, NASL retained the services of Duane Burke, President of Public Gaming Research Institute, to help coordinate the Association’s activities in relation to the federal government. Although the IRS sought to impose a 20 percent withholding requirement on all lottery prizes, the lottery states, working in unison, were able to reduce the impact so that the requirement was only imposed on prizes of $5,000 or more. Also, the reporting requirements, as originally proposed by the IRS, were modified for the benefit of state lotteries.
Public Law 93-583
With federal authorities continuing enforcement of broadcast laws, the new lotteries and those already established were still tightly restricted in their ability to promote their products. Although many bills were introduced, Congress showed little interest in exempting the lottery states from the federal anti-lottery statutes until Attorney General William B. Saxbe warned in August 1974 that he was considering legal action to halt state lottery operations unless Congress acted within 90 days to exempt the state lotteries. In September, Saxbe summoned representatives of the 13 existing lottery states to Washington, D.C. Finally, on December 20, 1974, Congress passed Public Law 93-583 amending the anti-lottery laws. The changes allowed an intra-state use of the mails, and the use of radio and television in marketing lottery products, making it possible for the lotteries to advertise and communicate within their individual state borders.
During the period of 1974 to 1976, NASPL members, working together, were able to effect significant actions that facilitated the operation of state lotteries. In each case, the need for a united front was occasioned by a proposal or action by the federal government.
1976-1980
NASL Meetings, Bylaws, and Objectives
In 1976, the Association decided to meet only three times per year -- once in a general session open to both members and associate members, and twice in closed executive session. Also, in the late 1970’s, the purposes, objectives and duties of the Association were brought into sharper focus, and an expanded set of bylaws were introduced and adopted by the membership. To the original three purposes, the following were added:
To establish a regular liaison among the officials of state lotteries to facilitate communication regarding matters of mutual interest;
To promote recognition of the importance of maintaining public confidence and support for state lotteries as a means of generating revenue to meet public needs;
To provide assistance to other states which may be interested in establishing state lotteries; and
To investigate the feasibility of coordinating the lottery operations of the several stated.
During the 1978-1980 term of office, the NASL President, John Winchester, worked to improve the Association by concentrating on its main objectives, including the coordination of efforts to amend Federal statutes adversely affecting state lotteries, the maintenance of public confidence and support for state-run lotteries, and the continuing study of all forms of gambling for possible implementation into lottery product mix.
1980 - 1989
Between 1980 and 1989, NASL membership, under the leadership of Lynn Nelson, John Quinn, Martin Puncke, Guy Simonis and J. Blaine Lewis, Jr., took an enormous leap with eighteen U.S. lotteries coming onboard as members of the Association. Added to the 19 existing members, the Association grew to 37 by the end of the decade.
In 1984, the Association determined that the name of the organization -- the National Association of State Lotteries (NASL) -- was not appropriate because of the membership of the Canadian lotteries and the name was changed to the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries (NASPL).
In 1988, NASPL held its first Conference with a trade show in Cincinnati, Ohio in a joint effort with Public Gaming Research Institute.
In 1989, the Association divided the member lotteries into four regions and added regional directors to the organization. This action set the stage for regional conferences and ease of travel for lottery staff that would not be attending the annual fall NASPL conferences.
1990-1999
By 1990, membership in the Association continued to grow, and it was decided that the Association should no longer be managed from the NASPL President’s state. Under the leadership of NASPL President James E. Hosker, William S. Bergman and Associates, an outside association management firm, was recruited to manage the Association from their offices in Washington, D.C.
First NASPL Publication
To further expand the exchange of information, in mid-1993, the NASPL Association contracted for an eight-page newsletter, Lottery Insights, which was distributed on a monthly basis to the membership. (In March 1997, the publication was brought in-house.)
Lottery College Begins
In 1994, NASPL, in joint cooperation with B.R.I.D.G.E. (Bi-National Regional Initiative Developing Greater Education), held its first week-long Lottery College in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. The College attracted 43 delegates from Canada, the U.S., Australia and Europe. Enrollment was open to Lottery executives, vice presidents, senior managers, directors and vendors and provided industry professionals with a unique lottery learning and networking opportunity.
By 1995, NASPL had grown to 46 members. Due to increasing NASPL obligations, the Association hired its first full-time management team, DBG Consulting, Inc. in March 1995 and named David B. Gale, Executive Director. At this time, the NASPL Headquarters was moved to Cleveland, Ohio from Washington, D.C. Also in this year, NASPL was busy coordinating the activities of lotteries in dealing with the Internal Revenue Service on assignment of prizes.
During 1996, NASPL dealt with pertinent issues, such as the finalization of plans to offer an accreditation program for lottery professionals; the coordination of a joint conference with A.I.L.E./Intertoto in Vancouver, hosted by the British Columbia Lottery Corporation; and the formation of a Task Force to consider NASPL’s involvement with the National Gambling Impact Study Commission.
National Gambling Impact Study Commission
In August 1996, the President of the U.S. signed into law the National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act, and a Commission was created to study the social and economic impact of gambling in the U.S.
In 1997, NASPL attempted to secure representation on the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, and failing in that, then to establish a relationship with the staff and members of the NGISC. This time period heralded the beginning of the Commission’s gathering of information and its formal meetings which continued throughout 1998 and part of 1999, until June when the final report was issued.
Altogether, many NASPL members were deeply involved, responding to the media, testifying, attending meetings and keeping the membership totally informed. And the membership, in turn, provided the Commission with literally box loads of information. Because there was no lottery representation on the Commission, three NASPL Presidents (Dr. Edward Stanek, Commissioner of the Iowa Lottery; Rebecca Paul, President of the Georgia Lottery; and George R. Andersen, Director of the Minnesota Lottery) had to work doubly hard trying to provide accurate information at meetings and to the media. But despite all efforts, their information seemed to fall on deaf ears and resulted in what Dr. Edward Stanek (NASPL President 1996-97) had predicted very early in the game: "The deck was stacked and the dice were loaded!" The June report specifically targeted lotteries and myths and inaccuracies continued.
NASPL Dialogue
The first NASPL Dialogue was held in April 1998 in Cleveland, Ohio. The purpose of this dialogue was to include the vendor community in discussions with members of the NASPL Executive Committee regarding the "state of affairs" of our industry.
Ott Brown Scholarship Program
Also in mid-1998, the Ott Brown Scholarship Program was established in recognition of Ott Brown, the late President of the Connecticut Lottery Corporation. This award represents much of what was important to Ott Brown and creates opportunities for people to learn and grow. The program designates that NASPL will award one lottery professional a scholarship that will allow the recipient to attend the Lottery Leadership Institute.
Public Sector Gaming Study Commission
In early 1999, to counteract the expected bias of the NGISC report, the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States (NCLGS) created a Public Sector Gaming Study Commission (PSGSC) and named a tenured professor from Florida State University, Dr. Lance deHaven-Smith, as Executive Director of the Commission. NASPL’s Immediate Past President, Rebecca Paul, was also selected to serve as Vice President of the Commission. When the final report of this Commission was published in March 2000, much of what the lottery industry had been saying was vindicated.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Osman Musa
عبد المنعم سيد احمد
ahmedona
سفيان بشير نابرى
عبد العزيز عبدالكريم نهار
Mohamed Yassin Khalifa
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست