|
|
 خليل يطيح بالبشير لحظة صدور القرار
|
د. خليل إبراهيم يقول إنه سوف يصعد هجماته ويطيح بالبشير عند صدور القرار ويعتبر إنه سوف يصبح رئيس غير شرعي حسب ما ورد في صحيفة التايمس اللندنية. وقال إنه وقواته سوف يعملون بكل جهدهم من الأجل الإطاحة به لأنه سوف يصبح رئيس فاقد للشرعية وسوف يبدأ ذلك لحظة صدور القرار. وقد اجرى اللقاء الصحافي انتوني لويد في انجمينا بتشاد.
هذا كلام جاد ويجب التفاكر حوله ويبدو إنه عند صدور القرار كما توقعنا سوف تحدث أشياء كثر.
أبوهريرة
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article5792810.ece
From The Times
February 24, 2009
Darfur rebel leader vows to topple President al-Bashir
Anthony Loyd in N'Djamena
The leader of the most powerful rebel group in Darfur said that his forces will redouble their efforts to topple the Sudanese Government the moment an international arrest warrant is issued against President al-Bashir.
“When this warrant comes it is, for us, the end of Bashir's legitimacy to be President of Sudan,” Khalil Ibrahim, chairman of the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), told The Times. “We will work hard to bring him down ... If he doesn't co-operate with the ICC [International Criminal Court] the war will intensify.”
Prosecutors for the ICC charged the Sudanese President last year on ten counts — three of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and two of war crimes. The court, based in The Hague, is considering the application for an arrest warrant and is expected to rule on March 4.
According to the charge sheet Mr al-Bashir “masterminded and implemented a plan to destroy in substantial part the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa groups” during a campaign of ethnic persecution in the Darfur region that the UN estimates has cost 300,000 lives in five years.
Related Links
* International court sets sights on al-Bashir
* Peace hopes rise on Sudan prisoner swap deal
Advocates of the ICC say that a warrant is overdue and that the court has been the only entity to succeed in pressurising Khartoum towards ending the war in Darfur.
Its critics — China, Russia and the African Union among them — say that an ICC warrant will put an end to hopes for a peace process and increase violence.
Since he was charged Mr al-Bashir has been soliciting support from the African Union and Arab nations.
Dr Ibrahim, who spoke to The Times in Chad, had just returned from a round of exploratory peace talks with a Sudanese delegation in Qatar last week, where officials from both warring parties signed a memorandum of goodwill and understanding.
“The [Sudanese] Government is unpredictable,” he said, seated in an orchard on the banks of the Chari River outside N'Djamena, the capital of Chad. “They never honour any agreement they sign.”
Although it is still no match for the Sudanese Army, the JEM has rapidly become the dominant force among the splintered Darfur insurgency since an audacious attack by hundreds of its fighters on Omdurman in May.
A JEM delegation was invited to Washington for bilateral talks with US officials last month, and it was the only rebel group invited to the negotiations in Qatar — to the anger of rival rebel factions from the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA).
This, Dr Ibrahim maintained, was because since 2006 the SLA had fractured into 27 groups and that, like it or not, the JEM was the only cohesive presence on the battlefield posing a credible threat to Mr al-Bashir.
“JEM is fighting alone on the ground,” he said, “shouldering the whole issue because there are no other real movements on the ground.”
Western diplomats believe that the Qatari talks have little chance of success given the gap between the ambitions of the JEM - which include control of Khartoum and the transformation of Sudan into a federation of autonomous regions — and Mr al-Bashir's desire to cling to power.
Few major concessions were extracted from either side in Qatar. The rebel delegation turned down a request to sign a cessation of hostilities until their own list of preliminary demands had been accepted, which the Sudanese refused.
The only tangible concession was a commitment from each side to release prisoners of war. At the weekend Sudan released 24 rebels in response to the release of 21 government prisoners last week. The rebels said however that they will not return to Qatar for a second round of talks until all their men are free.
The fear among the international community is that the conflict will become a war of secession and will spread to neighbouring countries.
While the stated aim of JEM is to preserve the territorial integrity of Sudan it is equally clear that the rebels are ready to divide the country. “JEM is a national movement and we regard autonomy for the regions as a key to peace,” Dr Ibrahim said. “But if peace does not come quickly Kordofan [a province in central Sudan] and Darfur would have to form their own entity — Western Sudan — with the White Nile as its border. If there was no peace then this part would have to become its own country.
“We are not going to ask to control Darfur and Kordofan through peace talks if they [the Government] are not going to give it — we'll take it.”
Racism and rebellion
— The Darfur conflict began in 2003 when mainly black African rebels started attacking police stations, military convoys and army outposts in response to “racist policies of neglect” by the Arab-dominated Government. The Sudanese Army responded with massive air and land offensives on rebel strongholds
— An ICC charge sheet alleges that President al-Bashir “failed to defeat the armed movements so he went after the people. His motives were largely political. His intent was genocide”
— The Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), unlike other Darfur rebel groups, has an expansive political agenda, including the overthrow of Mr al-Bashir and the establishment of a federation. It is funded by Gulf financiers as well as the Chadian Government, with whom it shares tribal ties
— Khalil Ibrahim, JEM's leader, is a former government official and supporter of the hardline Islamist politician Hassan al-Turabi. The group has had to tone down its Islamic rhetoric to extend its support among Darfur's people
— JEM was heavily criticised in Darfur for choosing to attend preliminary peace talks in Qatar alone, rather than presenting a united front against Khartoum. JEM insists that all Darfur groups will be represented if the talks progress towards a peace deal, but it refuses to share a negotiating table with factions of the once-dominant Sudan Liberation Army
Source: Times database
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
ابوهريرة زين العابدين
ترهاقا
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست