Voice of the unheard & home to the homeless
Front Page  ŕ—»ž
«Š„š»— «Šŕ«„
 Latest News
 Articles and Analysies
 Press Releases
 Photo Gallery
 About Sudan
  Sudanese Music
  Sudanese Links
  Discussion Board
  2006 News Archives
  2006 Articles Archives
  2006 Press R.Archives
  2005 News Archives
  2005 Articles Archives
  2005 Press R.Archives
  PC&Internet Forum
  Poll System
  Tell A Friend
  Upload Your Picture
  Contact Us


Articles and Analysies «Š’›Õ… «Šŕ—»Ū… Last Updated: Jan 14, 2010 - 4:18:05 PM

The viability of the two Sudan, South and the North by Nhial K. Wicleek

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The viability of the two Sudan, South and the North


Conditions never better the achievable political structure when system acts against the wills of the aspirers for a better system.   It only increases and intensifies the jeopardy to the system and so comes restlessness of the State.   This is symbolic framework of a failed system in Sudan.   But the irony in relative to question is should a viable south Sudan be seen before or after twelve months period? When I came across this title ď Can south Sudan be a viable state?Ē on A BBC headline NEWS JANUARY 12, 2010, I smiled and giggled for I know the political arena of the Sudan and all its trends.   On a daily basis I do follow daily events to which most of them are uncondensed and yet with no clarity, they represent the illogicality of forming a solid structure leading Sudan to be what it is today.   Yet, with utmost atmosphere these things are part of ongoing circumstances ignited by the wake of ideologies before any clashing of the ideologies is seen surfacing.   With no doubt, the considered ideologies as the engines of the liberation struggle come to play in favour of the partiesí interest.   The main fuel of the engines (to the south, democratic rule and right of the people, and to the north charia law) was not so complex, but has developed a strong base in the hearts of the people who opposed the arrogant people who assumed superiority than the others.  


Moreover, Sudan is one and is more diverse fitting the popular ideologies to clashes.   For lack of acknowledgement, and less regard to living a communal life, the protagonists (Jellaba) in such a dull ideology thought that primitiveness has no end, and that their hidden secret would never be uncovered.   As time goes by, the formation of ideologies dating back to 1962 as the birth of anya nya I intensely remain the continuation of the birth of the many ideologies (Anya nya II, and the SPLM/A).   This is the foundation of the bridges which have never had connection.   The protagonists (Jellaba) aspire deep with no sense of judging what should be considered a legitimate aspiration for all, they; nevertheless, segregate and keep such form of humility without knowing the building block which would later become these ideologies (Democratic rule, freedom of the southern people, and the south Sudan independent movement ĎPioneered by Dr. Macharí that is based on what to be the independent state).   A gap that has never closed since the first rebellion remains the power engine of the proxy ideologies that clashes.   What implicates the clashes of ideologies which were brought to being through cultural differences, religious differences, racial segregation, and language differences was the wider gap created by the Jellaba between yellow and green regions (south & north).   The creation of this gap should have been closed if Jellaba had known the perplexity of todayís political change to convince the destitute about togetherness and living a life in one country, the Sudan.   Today is too late to close this gap.


Even if some would view these points less important and unrealistic reasons, complication of the situation was actually facilitated by these above mentioned words.   As a matter of fact, it is to be recalled that Sudan operates as a sovereign state since after the end of British colonial rule in 1956 where the todayís gap could have been closed.   Arabs dominated regime says unity is number one choice which mean to exploit the rich south Sudan and that people would still have wider gap economically.   This means the first class southern Sudanese elites would fit the second class in the entire Sudan so that the first class Arabs in the north would still rank first economically.   This is the reason Jellaba favour the notion of a united Sudan for.   Can this be favoured as great move southerners?


If not clear, another reason would be the current political sidelining of the northern regime against its marginalized regions or other areas.    One can deny the feasibility of Sudan political differences, but it should be northern individual to say no such complications in the expense of the current ideological differences.   However, the significant differences should have been placed over racial lines and political segregation where Arab Sudanese remain to be that way because they consider the ďsoutherners as slavesĒ (Mohamed suliman) and that they should never give up in persisting with hectic behaviour against southerners and other marginalized people in this meantime.   These important reasons alone shrink the diversity Sudan where all races and religion should have been represented with equality and equity, and discourage the two viable Sudan, come 2011 referenda.  


As brought forth by the reporters of the BBC, it is in fact a wonderful time to question these significant questions of unity and separation, to be able to find how reliable they should be in the following twelve months.   But the thing is those who put more analyses to occurring circumstances in Sudan have met the answer long before any of these questions is asked.   They know in their heart that there is no united Sudan, period.   But question remain to how a viable state such as young south Sudan should be run, not will it be a viable state?


On the basis of the political change, the perception of the black African Sudanese for a united Sudan fad away during the first bullet fired.   The grudges between the two opponents grow rapidly.   There were; nonetheless, varieties of strong barriers leading to caring the development processes on unequal basis.   Building the north Sudan in form of neglect to the South Sudan accelerates the conflict to its peak scale where the conflicting issues remain none resolvable.    This fits the category of a divided county.  


To nail out the point, beginning with the title that question the viability of the south Sudan and ďthe two states,Ē I would say division of the Sudan has long been encouraged on the basis of the simultaneously restricted development and political growth of the black African Sudanese by their counterpart the Arabs dominated north.  


Some typical reasons that bear the truth of the great division of the two Sudan to come are as follow:  


First, after the rectification of the government bodies in 1972, southerners and the other marginalized people were underrepresented.   They were denied access to laddering, to successfully obtain the political growth like most other northern Arab politicians in all levels of government.  


Second, access to education was denied, and people were enslaved to the point they had become unhappy for their counter-Arab individuals whom they view equal with them.   Scholarships were distributed on racial lines and placed neglect and ignorant attitude to non-Arab children in the country.   Services distributions were made unequal for all, some were favoured and others remained unfavourably given their shares.


Third, developments were carried out through neglect and social indulgent or nothing as such at all.   The southern part and other marginalized areas faced this neglect and developmental isolation by the successive regime of the Arabs dominated north of the country.   Lack of infrastructure rampant and the beating of drums continue for southerners outright the nationwide humility imposed upon by their foe.   What a regime?


Fourth, extermination of the politicians was the subject discourse in the mosques, and some other secret areas where politics is played by the likeminded Jellaba who perceived themselves superior and highly consider  Jellaba a civilized being which was nothing but a racial segregation like the apartheid in South Africa.  


Should the Arabs claim for a united Sudan in this regard or better for them to remain silent and leave the fate of separation and unity to the suffered people who undergone marginalization for so long to decide on their own?


I think Sudan had seen this invisible great division.   A division that had not favoured togetherness has long been witnessed through these different occasions.   I can refer back once again to 1972 agreement which could have been regarded fake agreement because there was nothing special in it.   It only implicates the current political struggle causing much destruction than to cut short and embraced the todayís sense of a united Sudan if function and structural forms were fulfilled once after the agreement.   Are we one really, Sudanese?   What happen was that undervaluing of the southern people had come to play and so humility had to occur fitting southerners against the northerner Arab elites for another time.   With the introduction of the mischievous rule, come the charia law in 1989, and that contributes to the inception/continuation of the SPLM/A which was the reason for southerners to take up arms against the oblivious regime that lives in ignorance and dull ideology favouring only Arabization in a land that combines different ethnic backgrounds.


The hardest war was fought for 21 years to the extent that lives were lost on both sides.   None would ever feel happy about this unjustified condition of the Jellaba that had enormously remained extreme, but as a matter of fact, struggle is what it is to take, given the circumstance.   It is in no way that southerners could not opt for war, for there was no ultimate reason to resort to war.   If agreement favours a united Sudan, it should have been met with the 1972 agreement.   But, because Jellaba considers deception as a formal political growth, they never hold on to their signature, and that disruption had to take part every now and then.    In this, where is the unity Arabs always cry for?


In 2005, the comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) was signed.   Attended by dignitaries from across the globe, the Arab-led regime called national congress party (NCP) dishonoured the demands and protocols that could contribute in reconciling the long stand differences between the warring parties that have clashing ideologies (one that favour charia law and the one that favour democratic rule).   The worst case scenario that comes to play is unattractiveness of the development as agreed upon, lack of wealthy sharing, and lack of political transparency which is why south and the north will have to be divided and remain separate states without resistant from the people that underwent such a hardship and sorrowful condition.


For those who question the viability of the south to become an independent country, of course, is true for them to ask.   The viability of the South Sudan is realistic for the following reasons.   It has big oil reserves throughout the land, it has good fertile soil that will enhance the growth of crops, it has all other minerals such as uranium, gold, and cooper, and it has everything a state can have, so why not stand on its own as a sovereign state and manages her own resources like most other states in Africa continent?


But for unity lovers, if the above mentioned points had been fulfilled by the northern regime, the aspiration of the people throughout the country could have remained together and so all spirits should favour unity of the Sudan or a united Sudan that is built on a common ground with viable objective.   But what happened in the first place should not be confused with short lived agreement that did not do anything in this current tough time, but to exploit the south Sudan resources.   Those things created a divided Sudan to my personal view based on how I understand Sudan politics.


 I like the quote ďvote for unity and you will become a second class citizen, or vote for separation and you will be free,Ē said John Garang.   If that is so, I am more likely impressed by the ideology of separation and those who stood firm with it.   To become separatist means to stop dishonouring behaviour of the Arab regime-led government in the north Sudan.  


In conclusion, Sudan was already divided and so comes the finalization of this great division in time of referendum.   Whether you and I like it or not, there is no ultimate solution to stop all these garbage of Jallaba in the north than to separate.   However, southern Sudan would become a viable state no matter what it takes.   The land is rich in everything acquired by any county on the planet earth.   It has all necessary might it should for it to be a sovereign state.   So why should we boast for a united Sudan where our partner had been cheating us throughout all these years?


Nhial K. Wicleek lives in Canada.   He can be reached at [email protected]


© Copyright by SudaneseOnline.com

Please feel free to send us your Articles , Analysies news and press releases to [email protected]

Top of Page

This report does not necessarily reflect the views of Sudanese Online.com

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Articles and Analysies
  • Political Divorce a lesson for both the Sudan and the rest of Africa.By: Justin Ambago Ramba
  • China has been silent about the war in Darfur in order to reap the benefits from Sudanese oil and the sale of Chinese weapons to the Sudanese government by Jaafar Mirmar
  • Sleeping with the Devil:When the US goes the wrong way in Sudan by Ibrahim Ali Ibrahim -Washington, DC
  • South Sudan is never too young for an independent state By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Making Justice is a Political pinyana in south Sudan. By: Daniel Abushery Daniel
  • A letter to UN Secretary General by Dr. Mohamed Ali Mustafa
  • Kiir Promises Clean Water while the Food continues to come from Uganda. By: Justin Ambago Ramba
  • Why Egypt Threatens the Africans over their own Water By Izzadine Abdul Rasoul
  • Let the Debate Boil Down to the ReferendumÖ Not a Dead Unity!! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • No Negotiation with Al-Bashir Government even if the venue is in white House By: Abdellatif Abdelrahman
  • NCP: End this Ignoble Episode By Usman Ibn Foda-CRID, Abuja
  • Idriss Deby, The Ultimate Hater of South Sudanese! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • To Salva Kiir: Donít Fuel Athorís Rebellion By Dr. James Okuk
  • Why NCP blackmails the AU, UN Forces in Darfur?By : Abdellatif Abdelrahman.
  • A Tougher Obama is needed to secure a Peaceful Divorce in Sudan. By: Dr. Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Lam Akolís Flunkies Are His Worst Enemies!! By Luk Kuth Dak:
  • Dr. Josephine Laguís case exposes the nasty face of tribal politics in south Sudan. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Should Padang-Dinka community continue silent over Jongeli incident? By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Why Dr. Lam Akol Shouldnít Be The Minister Of Foreign Affairs!! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • The Not Inevitable War in Sudan: Goss vs. NPC By: Dr. Mohamed N Bushara
  • Agarís snub on south Sudanís independence must cease. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Scandalous Pipes Market Disaster or the Ponzi scheme in El-Fasher By Mahmoud A. Suleiman
  • Is American policy over Sudan invidious? By Izzadine Abdul Rasoul
  • An Independent South Sudan Is Vital to USA!! By Luk Kuth Dak
  • Letís SPLM Political Bureau be answerable to all current messes in the South By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • How bitter the injustice suffered, south Sudan must still come first. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Panaruu-Dinka historical, political naivety and leniency towards the SPLM by Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Western Equatoria: The will to resist and succeed. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Sudan Elections 2010: Defective beyond repair! By Arman Muhammad Ahmad
  • A Unified Sudanese Currency II by Abdel - Halim Anwar Mohamed Ahmed Mahgoub
  • voting in election is hallmark of demcracy by Siddik, Nadir Hashim
  • The Rigged Elections Boxes Should Be Disqualified By Dr. James Okuk
  • General election of Sudan By Aru Mayan:
  • Nasir Declaration was a well calculated move to destroy the Nuer tribe by Simon R. Gatluak,
  • the manifesto of the Sudanese Emancipation United Movement (SEUM) by Aguer Rual
  • When confusion steps in, then only a genuine change can help. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Letís your vote not throttle the CPA By Atok Dan
  • Watch out; is your transport fee to your voting centre available? By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Delaying the Election is not a Good Option by Nhial K. Wicleek lives in Canada.
  • Are Independent candidates still SPLM members? I doubt BY: Isaiah Abraham, JUBA
  • The SPLM Party Is The Answer: By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • Dose general Scott Gration Understand get lost? by Hatim Elmedani*
  • SPLM Tactics of Scaring Away Voters in Southern Sudan By Dr. James Okuk
  • Civil liberty must precede the civil divorce. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Seeking Justices for the Rape Victims of Terekeka.By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Will the National Election in Sudan takes place? By Federico Vuni
  • Southerners have better reasons to vote for H.E Salva Kiir Mayardit By: Gieth A. Dauson
  • Dr. Lam Akol SPLM-DC candidate reveals early defeat in Sudan April elections By Magdelina John
  • National Interest first By Kenjok D, Bentiu
  • Kiir declares the Central Equatoria State votes as insignificant! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Go to Hague! by Hatim El-Medani
  • Vote for Salva, Vote for Change, is it a Joke? Nhial K. Wicleek lives in Canada
  • President Kiir and VP Machar campaign rally in Bor, Jonglei is historic BY: Mawut Guarak , NEW YORK , USA
  • Watch out SPLA/M by Dr. Mawien Akot is a family physician in Wynyard, Canada.
  • Rushing or NOT, the CPA ends in 2011, IGAD reiterates! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Medical Registrars threatening to go on strike over pay increase by By Federico Vuni
  • Your vote may land us into trouble! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • The Future Of South Sudan Will Be Brighter Than Others Think! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • Opinion Poll on nominees for South Sudan Government by Shean Ashang
  • GOSS Corruption: Minister Awut Deng stops recruitment of diplomats BY: David Joseph Lomoro, JUBAs
  • Lam Akol set to meet his Waterloo By Majok Nikodemo Arou
  • Stop the Humanitarian Blockade of Jebel Marra, Darfur BY Dr. Anne Bartlett
  • Who is best leader for South Sudan after April? By DJames Okuk
  • Southerners have Perfected Political Hypocrisy and are becoming vendors.By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • (JEM) has not intended to keep the Fellow Combatants out of the Darfur Peace Process By Mahmoud A. Suleiman