ماذا يحدث بدار فور, وأين هم أبناء الإقليم؟

ماذا يحدث بدار فور, وأين هم أبناء الإقليم؟

كلنا نعلم بأن هناك صراع قبلي في إقليم دار فور, ولكننا لا نعلم إلى أي مستوي وصل أليه هذا الصراع. الملاحظ في هذا الصراع أن الحكومات قامت بتسليح قبائل ضد قبائل وذلك أدى لتصعيد الصراع وصبغه بصبغة عرقية وسياسية, وفي نفس الوقت نجد هناك تعتيم إعلامي تام علي الذي يحدث بدار فور. لقد حضرت ندوة سياسية للدكتور أحمد إبراهيم دريج ولقد كنت حريصا أن أحضر تلك الندوة لكي أسمع من وجهة نظره عن ماذا يدور في ذلك الإقليم المنسي, لكن بكل آسف لقد ركز الدكتور حديثه عن نظام الجبهة و الأحوال في السودان عموما. ,أني أتسائل ماذا يحدث بدار فور, وأين هم أبناء الإقليم؟


Deng

المدهش اننا جميعا نجهل ما يدور هنالك
ربما ننتظر اشتعال الحرائق بصورة جسيمة وبعدها نشرئب لنعرف الحاصل
قبل فترة نقلت الى المنتدى تحت عنوان البيت الكبير بيتهدم خبر نشرته جريدة طلاب الشعبي ان 50 دبابة وطائرات هلكوبتر قد توجهت الى دارفور

ولم يعقب احد

عودة الى سؤالك الهام يا أخ دينق
نرجو من ابناء دارفور تزويدنا بمعلومات عن الذي يجري هناك

هل هي حرب عرقية؟
هل هي حرب ضد حكومة الجبهة
هل هي عمليات نهب مسلح وتسعى الحكومة لانهائها؟
هل تبحث الحكومة عن ضحية جديدة لاعلان الجهاد والزواج بالحور العين بعد ان دخلت امريكا ملعب الجنوب؟


خليكم معانا يا ابناء دارفور

زول واحد.

شكرا للرد, فعلا أن الذي يحدث في إقليم دار فور شئ محير ويحتاج لوقفة أيضا.
ولي عودة.


Deng

??

لقد كتبت بوستي هذا في السابع من فبراير المنصرم, ولقد حدثت أحداث كثيرة بعد ذلك, ولقد كان من ضمنها الحركة المسلحة الحالية. الحركة التي مازال الناس يختلفون في تسميتها كثيرا, فهي غير معروفة الأهداف والأصل, هنالك من ينسبها لجماعة الترابي الاخوانية وهنالك أيضا من ينسبها لأحمد إبراهيم دريج وآخرون يصفونها بحركة جديدة مستقلة.
هل هناك من أحد بأن يفيدنا هنا بما يجري في دارفور, ومن هم الذين يقودون الكفاح المسلح؟

Deng.

Deng,
You rised a good issue that needs more discussion. Also, you can view the article bellow, it might give you some clue about what is going on in Darfur; and if there is anyone knows more about Darfur's issue, please let us know.


The article is:


THE SUDAN LIBERATION MOVEMENT AND

SUDAN LIBERATION ARMY (SLM/SLA)

POLITICAL DECLARATION

Introduction:

Darfur had been an independent state from the sixteenth century to the second decade of the twentieth, when it was coercively annexed to the modern day Sudan . As an independent state, Darfur enjoyed worldwide recognition and had embassies in the capitals of the major empires of that time. If Sudan is seen as the microcosm of Africa , Darfur is the microcosm of Sudan . The peaceful coexistence between its African and Arab tribes, between the sedentary populations and the nomadic ones and between emigrants from its eastern and western neighbours and indigenous groups was the source of its stability, prosperity and strength.
However, successive post-independence regimes in Khartoum , both civilian and military, have introduced and systematically adhered to the policies of marginalization, racial discrimination, exclusion, exploitation and divisiveness. Darfur was made and continues to be a reservoir of cheap labour for central Sudan’s agricultural and industrial projects, the major source of lower-ranking soldiers thrown into the fray of the supremacist war waged by Khartoum against south Sudan, Nuba, Fung, Beja, Rashaida and other marginalized areas, and a fair game for central Sudan ’s political parties and elite seeking to field non-indigenous parliamentary candidates in safe seats.

The monopolization of power and wealth led to the institutionalisation of the hegemonic policies of riverain Sudan ’s dominating establishment. These were further entrenched through the fueling of ethnic and tribal wars, with the governments in Khartoum providing military assistance to some Arab tribes and organizations to fight against their non-Arab brethren, with whom they have peacefully co-existed for centuries. Rapid desertification, famines and cross-border population movements from neighboring countries into Darfur have provided Khartoum ’s regimes with additional ammunition to further its divisive policies between Arab and non-Arabs and sedentary and nomadic groups. These evil policies reached their zenith on the hands of the NIF junta that usurped power in June 1989. The present Khartoum junta has even created a Bantustan-type department of tribal affairs whose mission is to oversee the implementation of Khartoum ’s divide and rule schemes and channel government assistance to its local allies. These policies have resulted in massive human rights violations amounting to ethnic cleansing and genocide in certain areas of all the three states of Darfur .
The brutal oppression, ethnic cleansing and genocide sponsored by the Khartoum Government left the people of Darfur with no other option but to resort to popular political and military resistance for purposes of survival. This popular resistance has now coalesced into a political movement known as the Sudan Liberation Movement and its military wing, the Sudan Liberation Army (SLM/SLA), which we are happy to announce today to the Sudanese people and to the world at large.

The Objective of SLM/A:

Although the SLM/A has originated from Darfur as a matter of necessity in response to the brutal genocidal policies of the NIF Government in that region, we want to affirm and underline that the SLM/A is a national movement that aims along with other like-minded political groups to address and solve the fundamental problems of all of Sudan. The objective of SLM/A is to create a united democratic Sudan on a new basis of equality, complete restructuring and devolution of power, even development, cultural and political pluralism and moral and material prosperity for all Sudanese.

SLM/A Position on the Unity of Sudan :
The Sudan Liberation Movement/Army is of the view that Sudan ’s unity is of paramount importance, but it should not be maintained and cannot be viable unless it is based on justice and equality for all the Sudanese peoples. Sudan ’s unity must be anchored on a new basis that is predicated on full acknowledgement of Sudan ’s ethnic, cultural, social and political diversity. Viable unity must therefore ultimately be based on the right of self-determination and the free will of the various peoples of Sudan . The fundamental imperatives of a viable unity are an economy and political system that address the uneven development t and marginalization that have plagued the country since independence, so that the interests of the marginalized majority are adequately catered for and they are brought to the same level of development of the ruling minority. The SLM/A shall work with all political forces that ascribe to this view.
SLM/A Position on Human Rights and Democracy:
The SLM/A shall struggle for the full realization and respect for human rights and democratic pluralism in accordance with international standards leading to equal development and the eradication of political and economic marginalization.
SLM/A Position on System of Governance:
The SLM/A shall struggle to achieve a decentralized form of governance based on the right of Sudan ’s different regions to govern themselves autonomously through a federal or confederal system. At the same time the Central Government must be completely restructured and recast so that it adequately reflects Sudan ’s rich diversity as represented by the component regions, which are its stakeholders.

SLM/A Position on the Questions of Identity, Culture, Power and Wealth:
The SLM/A shall struggle to realize a new system of rule that fully respects the cultural diversity in the Sudan and creates new democratic conditions for cultural dialogue and cross-fertilization generating a new view of the Sudanese identity based on Sudanism. Sudanism will provide the Sudanese with the necessary space, regardless of whether they are Arabs or Africans, Christians or Muslims, Westerners or Easterners, Southerners or Northerners to achieve greater cohesiveness on the basis of the simple fact of being Sudanese. This would require restructuring of power and an equal and equitable distribution of both power and wealth in all their dimensions.



SLM/A Position on Religion:
Religion is a source of spiritual and moral inspiration for our peoples that serves the needs of our peoples and the entire humankind in their pursuit of peaceful interaction and greater moral and spiritual ascendancy. The state machinery belongs to all Sudanese regardless of their religious or spiritual values and its neutrality must be preserved. Religion and politics belong to two different domains and must be kept in their respective domain, with religion belonging to the personal domain and the state in the public domain, that is, religion belongs to the individual and the state belongs to all of us. In this way religion cannot become a cause of conflict among citizens of the same country.


SLM/A Position on Armed Struggle and Sudanese Opposition Armed Groups:

Armed struggle is one of our means to achieve our legitimate objectives. The SLM/A shall strive to achieve a common vision and programme of action and unity among Sudan’s different opposition armed groups as well as with non-armed political groups with which it shares the same political objectives.

SLM/A Position Regarding Arab Tribes and Groups in Darfur

The Arab tribes and groups are an integral and indivisible component of Darfur social fabric who have been equally marginalized and deprived of their rights to development and genuine political participation. SLM/A firmly opposes and struggles against the Khartoum government’s policies of using some Arab tribes and organization such as the Arab Alliance and Quresh to achieve its hegemonic devices that are detrimental both to Arabs and non-Arabs. We call upon all fellow citizens of Darfur from Arab background to join the struggle against Khartoum and its divisive policies, the restoration of our traditional and time-honoured peaceful coexistence and the eradication of marginalization. The real interests of the Arab tribes of Darfur are with the SLM/A and Darfur not with the various oppressive and transient governments of Khartoum .

SLM/A Position on Peaceful Solution to the Sudanese Problem

Negotiation for the peaceful resolution of Sudan’s conflict is one of our means of struggle to achieve our objective provided that it should be aimed at attaining a comprehensive and just peace. Negotiations must be conducted in good faith and the government must desist from its practices that seek to divide, co-opt and destroy opposition forces.


SLM/A Position Regarding the NDA and Other Political Forces:


SLM/A shall struggle to achieve understanding and common ground with the NDA and other political forces in order to remove the NIF’s dictatorial regime and establish a democratic system based on a new political dispensation of freedom, justice, respect for human rights and equality for all Sudanese. The SLM/A will therefore reach out to establish contact and dialogue with the NDA and other political forces.



SLM/A Appeal for Support:


We appeal to the sons and daughters of Darfur, both inside the Sudan and in the Diaspora, and to the Sudanese people in general, to give political an moral support to the SLM/A, and despite their poverty and suffering to make financial and material contributions to the SLM/A to enable it achieve the objective of a free and democratic New Sudan. We appeal to our people in the rural areas, both agriculturalists and pastoral nomads to rally behind the SLM/A and give the Movement their full political and material support. We appeal to our brothers in the regime’s armed forces to abandon the regime and join us, or if it is not possible to join us, not to fight us. We appeal to those in various government departments to find ways of supporting the SLM/A. We appeal to our intellectuals to use their pens and pock to support the SLM/A. We appeal to businessmen to make financial donations. We appeal to our women to organize and find ways to support the SLM/A. We appeal to our youth to join the SLA and contribute their generation’s share to rid our people of this dictatorship and establish a New Sudan that belongs equally to all its citizens.



SLM/A Position Regarding Neighbouring Countries and International Community:

The SLM/A shall strive to build relations of friendship and partnership with the neighbouring countries, especially the Republic of Chad, the Great Libyan Jamahiriya, Egypt and the Central African Republic, as well as all of Sudan’s other neighbours. The SLM/A shall seek to create friendly relationships with the international community that will enhance international peace and stability in the world away from Khartoum’s policies that have contributed to regional and international instability through its direct involvement in promotion of local, regional and international terrorism.


SLM/A Appeal for Humanitarian Assistance for Darfur :


Finally, on behalf of the people of Darfur , we appeal to the international community to assist the people of Darfur with humanitarian relief to address and ameliorate the serious and deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Region. Ethnic cleansing and other gross acts of genocide sponsored by the Khartoum regime have caused massive displacement and suffering in all the three states of Darfur. This has been further compounded by draught and desertification. The population is in dire need of food, human medicine, animal drugs and other non-food services.





(Signed):

_________________________


Minni Arkou Minnawi


Secretary General, SLM/SLA


Satellite Phone 8821631110628


Darfur , Sudan : March 13, 2003



Source: http://www.slma.tk.

تحياتى عزيزى دينق

مايحدث فى دارفور سابقا كان هناك سياسة فرق تسد من قبل الحكومة

وتحريض قبائل ضد اخرى وتسليح بعض القبائل ونزعها من اخرى فساد سياسة التطهير العرقى بمساعدة وايعاز من الحكومة فكان يقف موقف المدافع عن افعال وتصرفات بعض القبائل
ويتدخل بعد هزيمة الطرف الذى تريدها الحكومة ان تنهزم

ليعلن الحكومة عن مؤتمر صلح بقيادتها
ويحدد بنود ويتم تعيين لجنة لتنفيذ بنود هذا الصلح

ولان الحكومة لاتريد حلا لهذه المشاكل ليبقى سياسة الفرق تسد قائمة

ولكى تبقى الفتنة قابلة للانفجار لاتلتزم بتفيذ بنود الصلح واهم بند لدى الاطراف المتحاربة دية تلك الارواح التى ازهقت بلا ذنب فقط انهم دفعوا ارواحهم ثمنا لسياسات الحكومة ومازالت تدفع

ويتكرر الماساة باندلاع الصراع والحروبات مجددا

هذه السيناريوهات
قد تكررت لردح من الزمان

الا ان اهل دارفور ادركوا ماتسعى اليه الحكومة
هى ان تجعلهم يتقاتلون فيما بينهم
لتجعل الحكومة شعار الامن ذريعة
وتمتنع بطريقة مخيبة للامال عن تقديم اى خدمة لانسان دارفور

سواء للذين تدعمهم الحكومة بالسلاح ضد بعض القبائل او الذين تريد الحكومة ابادتهم

فاصبح الانسان الدارفورى يعانى ويلات الحروب المصطنعة من قبل الحكومة

فلا تنمية ولا صحة ولا تعليم ولا امن

فاصبح البلد حظيرة كبيرة لاشئ فيها فانسان دارفور همه الاول فى القرن الواحد والعشرون هو الماء

فما بالك عن باقى الضروريات

بالرغم ان الطبيعة اصبحت صعبة
وظروف الجفاف والقحط

ومع ذلك اصبحوا يعتمدون على تربية الماشية لتعويضهم على فقدانهم لكثير من الموارد
فقام الوليد بن طلال باحتكارها بعض ان قبضت الحكومة نصيبها من هذه الصفقة ماذا يفعل الدارفورى فى ظل هذا الظلم
ان مشكلة دارفور يا اخى دينق لايمكن حصرها فى هذه المساحة لانها اكبر

لذلك انا اكتفى هنا بان اقول ان دارفور مهمشة سياسيا واقتصاديا واجتماعيا
وهذا التهميش على كافة ابنائها
لذلك ادركوا انفسهم بان يحملوا السلاح جميعهم فى وجهة هذا العدو

فكانت حركة تحرير السودان

فهذه الحركة تضم الكثيرون من ابناء هذ االوطن وكل المهمشين من كافة انحاء السودان

فماكان من الحكومة الا ان تسعى جاهدا لتجعل هذا الامر فى اطار قبلى كما تعود من قبل فى سياساتها الفرق تسدية
وكان كل همها ان تبيد هذه الحكرمة باستخدام كافة الاسلحة حتى المحظورة منها الا انها لم تستطيع حيث ان هذه الحركة تضم كل ابناء هذا الاقليم بالاضافة لكل الاقاليم المهمشة
والدليل على ذلك ان اللواء ابراهيم بشرى عندما اتصل بالجزيرة وقال انا وسط اخوانى اكل معهم وانا اتعاطف مع قضيتهم فانه يعنى مايقول حيث وجد بعض من ابناء عمومته مع الحركة وكان المفاجئة

ووجد تشيكة حقيقية للسودان بكافة ابناءه

تتجسد فى حركة تحرير السودان