|
Re: «واشنطن بوست» تفنّد مزاعم أوكامبو ضد البشير (ووصفت مدعي لاهاي بـ المشكلة) (Re: بشري الطيب)
|
كولوم لينش فرد عملتو جريدة عديل يا جنابو
ده رأيه يعبر عنه لا عن رأي الجريدة العريقة دي
ديل جرايدهم دي ما ذي حقت ناس الانتباهة التي تعكس رأي الطيب مطفى لوحده
الرأي فيها خشم بيوت
طيب تعال شوف نفس الجريدة دي كتبت شنو قبل ده في نفس الموضوع
Quote: Darfur's Real Death Toll Sunday, April 24, 2005; Page B06
THE BUSH administration's challenge on Darfur is to persuade the world to wake up to the severity of the crisis. On his recent visit to Sudan, Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick took a step in the opposite direction. He said that the State Department's estimate of deaths in Darfur was 60,000 to 160,000, a range that dramatically understates the true scale of the killing. If Mr. Zoellick wants to galvanize action on Darfur, he must take a fresh look at the numbers.
The lowest Darfur mortality number previously cited came from the World Health Organization. Last year it reported that 70,000 people had died, and many observers repeated this number without explaining it. WHO's estimate referred only to deaths during a seven-month phase of a crisis that has now been going on for 26 months. It referred only to deaths from malnutrition and disease, excluding deaths from violence. And it referred only to deaths in areas to which WHO had access, excluding deaths among refugees in Chad and deaths in remote rural areas. In other words, the 70,000 estimate from WHO was a fraction of a fraction of the full picture. The 60,000 number that Mr. Zoellick cited as low-but-possible is actually low-and-impossible
|
طالع الارقام المرصودة في الاقتباس الفوق ده ... وبقية المقال
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12485-2005Apr23.html
......
واكتب واشنطن بوست / دارفور بالانجليزي شوف حاتطلع بي شنو
|
|
|
|
|
|