Dear all,,
First, let me explain how I got this “bad” news.
I use special service called CQ to get inside the Congress records. The CQ alert uses certain codes and country names. The Sudan is programmed in my service. On March 3rd, the alert pops out the Sudan name. When I checked it it this news about the Sudan. It was mentioned twice in the hearing. It was not in Mr. Brooks’ written testimony. It was in the hearing (QA) when he answered REP. ELLEN O. TAUSCHER questions pointing to that poster.
If there was a mistake in the copy I sent, that must be in the ORIGINAL ONE too and not only in the cut and paste that I have done. In other words if there is a mistake that must be in the Congress records and from the Congress side.
On Monday I will forward the whole hearing so everybody could make sure that it exists in the original document.
I think Sultan is right and it doesn’t need people to mock or joke!
It could happen even in the Congress record ! if we all are sure that that experiment did not take place in Sudan in 1962.
As we all agree there is no place else called “the Sudan” !!!!!
Again I apologize for forwarding this “bad” “might be mistaken news” whic if it is proven a "typo " it would make an honest mistake from my side.
By the way we pay money to get those mistakes!!!!