عاجل: بايدن يطلب من الكونغرس تمديد حالة الطواريء الوطنية الخاصة بالسودان

04:24 PM October, 29 2021

سودانيز اون لاين
Elhadi-
مكتبتى
رابط مختصر

*

Quote: Just In: Biden sends a letter to Congress requesting an extension of the state of emergency related to Sudan, which was first declared in 1997.

هذا الأمر يعني باختصار

أن تحصل الإدارة الأمريكية (إدارة بايدن) على صلاحيات أوسع للتعامل مع السودان

دون الرجوع للكونغرس

لي ياتو مدى سيستمر الإنقلابيون في تجاهل الرسائل الامريكية الواضحة؟

We will see !

Quote: الرسائل الامريكية الواضحة

رسالة الشعب السوداني اوضح وأقوى من كل الرسائل الأمريكية يا الهادي
وإرادة الشعب السوداني هي الحتستعيد حكومتها المدنية ما قرارات الكونغرس الأمريكية

مفهوم يا حافظ

لكن الانقلابيين ديل لا يفهموا الا لغة العقوبات

الاجراء دا تحديدا يا الهادي روتيني وتم مرتين في عهد الثورة و سيتم لاحقا ولا اعتقد سيلغى ما لم تحل مشكلة دارفور تماما

لا يا اخ محمد البشري
الإجراءات التي تعنيها صدرت باوامر تنفيذية منذ عهد كلنتون١٩٩٧ وما أعقبه من روساء
وهي فعلا تجدد دوريا. كل عام بواسطة الرئيس
وبالمناسبة. قرارات كلنتون. حول السودان المتعلقة بحقوق الانسان والارهاب. سبقت اندلاع حرب دارفور عام ٢٠٠٣وقد صدرت إجراءات لاحقة حول دارفور في عهدبوش واوباما
المهم قام ترامب وبعده بايدن بإلغاء عدد من القرارات واعتقد ان بايدن يحاول إعادتها عبر مخاطبة الكونقرس
الموضوع. في راي اعادة بعث وأحياء لعقوبات واستخدام ذات السلاح القديم

في. طريقة نطلع علي نص خطاب بايدن للكونقرس يالهادي !

تحصلت علي نص الخطاب من موقع البيت الابيض وهو فعلا معني بتجديدالعفوبات القديمة روتينيا
الا انه أضاف الانقلاب الحالي والاعتقالات كسبب إضافي. لتجديد العقوبات
مما يوحي انه كان بصدد الغائها
المهم عقوبات دورية وأدوها سوط '
A Message to the Congress on the Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to SudanOCTOBER 29, 2021STATEMENTS AND RELEASESTO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES:Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to Sudan declared in Executive Order 13067 of November 3, 1997, is to continue in effect beyond November 3, 2021.Sudan made strides in its transition toward democracy since 2019, but the military takeover of the government and arrest of civilian leaders now threaten those positive gains. The crisis that led to the declaration of a national emergency in Executive Order 13067; the expansion of that emergency in Executive Order 13400 of April 26, 2006; and the taking of additional steps with respect to that emergency in Executive Order 13412 of October 13, 2006, Executive Order 13761 of January 13, 2017, and Executive Order 13804 of July 11, 2017, has not been resolved. The situation in Darfur continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Therefore, I have determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13067, as expanded by Executive Order 13400, with respect to Sudan.JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.THE WHITE HOUSE,October 28, 2021

يبدو انه فات علي التدقيقفالخطاب قد أضاف الاحداث الاخيرة والانقلاب والعقوبات كسبب في التمديدلاحظ
In 2021 Sudan made strides in its transition toward democracy since 2019, but the military takeover of the government and arrest of civilian leaders now threaten those positive gains. The crisis that led to the declaration of a national emergency in Executive Order 13067; the expansion of that emergency in Executive Order 13400 of April 26, 2006; and the taking of additional steps with respect to that emergency in Executive Order 13412 of October 13, 2006, Executive Order 13761 of January 13, 2017, and Executive Order 13804 of July 11, 2017, has not been resolved.

تمديد حالة الطواريء الوطنية الخاصة بالسودان يعطي إدارة بايدن صلاحيات أوسع للاستجابة للتطورات الحالية في السودان

دون الحوجة للرجوع للكونغرس

أو بلغة الشارع عندنا

وضع صلاحيات ( البل ) بيد إدارة بايدن

Quote: Special Envoy Feltman: I spoke with SudanPMHamdok , Sovereign Council Chair Burhan, and Sudanese FM Mariam al-Mahdi today to deliver a clear message: the Sudanese people must be allowed to protest peacefully this weekend, and the United States will be watching closely.

مقال مهم لكاميرون هدسون كبير الباحثين في المجلس الأطلنطي

* ـ يطالب بتصنيف الدعم السريع كمنظمة إرهابية غلى غرار الحرس الثوري الإيراني ـ ـ

ويطالب واشنطن بالنظر بجدية في اتخاذ تدابير تستهدف القادة العسكريين في الجيش، وحلفائهم السياسيين ( ربما إشارة لمناوي وجبريل وغيرهم ) في المؤسسة العسكرية وربما تمتد تلك التدابير لتشمل (جهات خارجية) كان لها دور في التحريض أو المساعدة في الإنقلاب على الحكومة المدنية* ـ

وكذلك يتحدث عن إمكانية مساهمة الولايات المتحدة تسهيل مسألة العفو لقادة الجيش مقابل خروجهم من الحياة السياسية والاقتصادية في السودان..

Cameron Hudson

Time to get tough

Quote: Time to get tough After the West failed to prevent the seemingly inevitable coup last week, the prospects for reversing it now appear even more dim. That’s because the military, which was fully aware of the consequences of its takeover, believes it has chosen the only path available to ensure its own security. Knowing the United States would suspend its $700 million financial assistance program—the vast majority of which was going to subsidize incomes and basic foodstuffs for Sudan’s poorest—it has once again cravenly put its own survival above that of its people. For the United States and its partners, this black eye will not quickly fade and could well create lasting ripple effects across the region. If hundreds of millions of dollars in financial aid and intensive diplomatic engagement can’t convince Sudan’s military to stay the democratic course, what chance does Washington have in countries like Guinea, Mali, or Chad—where Western diplomats are also pushing back against military takeovers in favor of civilian regimes؟ That’s why it’s critical that Washington rejects any other deal among international elites that relieves the growing near-term pressure, but which ultimately betrays the demands of the millions of Sudanese calling for genuine change. While it has a painful history of thirty years of sanctions in Sudan, the United States must seriously consider targeted measures against military leaders and their political allies (and even external actors) that have aided the takeover and undermined civilian rule. The United States must also redouble its efforts to support Sudan’s vibrant civil society groups, which have become virtually the last hope for the country’s revolution, by funneling money to sustain their work and skirt the military’s insidious control of the internet. Another attention-grabbing move would be a US State Department designation of the country’s Rapid Support Forces—a paramilitary force responsible for the arrests and torture of several prominent politicians and activists this week—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, a precedent set when the Trump administration designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Further isolating and discrediting Sudan’s ultimate bad actor would show solidarity with the streets and would help remove a perennial spoiler from the country’s political future. Lastly (and as odious as it may be), the United States must remain open to the possibility of facilitating a soft landing for military leaders in exchange for their exit from the political and economic space they control. While they clearly can’t imagine a Sudan they don’t totally control, Sudan’s military brass likely also can’t imagine a future for themselves in which the threat of accountability hangs over them as it does now. Legislation absolving military leaders of past crimes and granting them immunity is a betrayal to Sudan’s many victims of atrocity and oppression, to say nothing of the blow it levels against international criminal justice. But it may be required to send the army back to the barracks. As Sudan rests on a knife’s edge, there are no simple solutions. But as the United States contemplates a way forward, it should learn from hindsight—namely, that if two years of transition hasn’t changed the military’s fundamental nature, nor will two more years of shared governance with civilians. US policy must recognize that Sudan’s military is bent on its own survival above all else. The military fooled Washington once—and cannot be allowed to do so again.

المقال كاملاً من هنا :

atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/sudans-coup-wasnt-a-failure-of-us-diplomacy-it-was-the-dawn-of-a-new-era-in-africa/