Organized stalking ?

( 4)



Quote: 41. Defendant Michael James Lindquist calls himself Apostle of the congregation. 42. At several times relevant to this case defendant Lindquist has led the way to some individuals who have been engaged in gang stalking of plaintiff and his children. 43. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has notified defendant that some individuals on the congregation and running team have been involved in gang stalking of plaintiff and his children. 44. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has asked defendant Lindquist to identify and to ask those who have been engaged in this wrongdoing to cease and desist from this type of harassment, and Lindquist has refused to do so. 45. On January 2, 2005, during worshiping services, an individual that has been harassing plaintiff walked into Lindquist’s office after he realized plaintiff had identified him. Plaintiff was not allowed to enter the office. 46. At the end of the service the individual stayed at Lindquist office while his companions left without him. 47. At several times relevant to this case high intensifies of radiation have been detected when plaintiff is passing across Lindquist’s home. 48. At several times relevant to this case, furtive high intensities of radiation have been detected to come from the direction of Lindquist’s home into plaintiff’s home. 49. Ruben Luna, plaintiff’s neighbor and a former government agent claims spending a week on the hospital after attesting before others to the legitimacy of plaintiff’s claims of electronic aggression. 50. At several times Luna has claimed to feel the effects of an electronic aggression. 51. Luna claims spending two weeks on the hospital with internal bleeding. 52. Luna had reassured plaintiff by telephone his willingness to testify in court as to the legitimacy of plaintiff’s claims of electronic aggression before reassuring plaintiff of his willingness to testify as to the legitimacy of plaintiff’s claims. 53. Luna lives across the street from defendant Watkins. 54. Lunas’ affidavit attesting to the legitimacy of plaintiff’s claims about an electronic aggression is part of the federal record. 55. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff’s mother has been critically ill exhibiting the typical symptoms of an electronic aggression including sleep deprivation, loss of concentration, swelling of eyes, unexplained pain and fatigue, erratic blood pressure, and severe dizziness. 56. At several times relevant to this case, meters have read intense amounts of non-ionizing and ionizing radiation inside the home of plaintiff’s mother. 57. At several times relevant to this case, intense amounts of non ionizing and ionizing radiation have been found inside the home of plaintiff’s in-laws. 58. Plaintiff’s father-in-law has been critically ill, displaying symptoms of overexposure to radiation including sleep deprivation, unexplained pain and fatigue, and erratic blood pressure. 59. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff’s mother-in-law has been displaying symptoms of overexposure to radiation, including sleep deprivation, loss of concentration, and unexplained pain and fatigue. She is now terminally ill. 60. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff’s neighbors have claimed suffering of sleep deprivation, pain and loss of concentration. 61. Plaintiff’s next-door neighbor has been critically ill several times. 62. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff’s pain has made plaintiff to walk out of the house in the middle of the night only to hear screams of joy coming from the neighborhood. 63. At several times relevant to this case the gang stalking and electronic aggression against plaintiff and his children has intensified during the times plaintiff has filed complains describing the misconduct of judge Hinojosa and judge Ramos. 64. Plaintiff has heard the same screams of joy from speeding vehicles attempting to run over plaintiff and his children. 65. At several times relevant to this case, the lights on the side of the street turn off during the night and on during the day when plaintiff is driving or walking with his children. 66. Plaintiff’s oldest daughter has witnessed streetlights turning off as plaintiff is driving by. 67. At several times relevant to this case, family members of named defendants have engaged in harassing of plaintiff. 68. At several times relevant to this case, named defendants have shared information to use in furtherance of the conspiracies to injure plaintiff and his children. 69. At several times relevant to this case vehicles have darted to plaintiff and to plaintiff’s children when plaintiff and his children have been walking around the neighborhood. 70. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has been thrown of the road by unidentified vehicles. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has been the subject of gang and electronic harassment by named defendants. 71. At several times relevant to this case speeding vehicles have attempted to ram plaintiff’s vehicle running red lights to avoid identification. 72. At several times relevant to this case defendant has darted her vehicle towards plaintiff and his children when they are walking around the neighborhood. 73. At several times relevant to this case, unidentified vehicles have attempted to ram the rear of plaintiff’s vehicle. 74. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff has been subjected to electronic harassment by named, unnamed, and unidentified individuals. 75. Two shots have been fired into plaintiff’s direction, and plaintiff filed a report with the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Department. 76. At several times relevant to this case high levels of ionizing radiation have occurred when plaintiff is attending church services on minority congregations, while the same intensities do not occur when plaintiff attends non-minority congregations. 77. At several times relevant to this case the street and electronic harassment compelled plaintiff to leave the state of Michigan, and the State of Texas. 78. The gang stalking and electronic aggression is more intense when plaintiff is with his children. 79. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has found lose or over tight lug nuts on the front wheels of plaintiff’s car. 80. The harassment has intensified during and after critical stages of litigation.

Arabic Forum