Organized stalking ?

( 2)




Quote: 32. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff’s children tremble on their sleep before the telephone rings. 33. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff’s children have asked for medicine while crying in pain when intense radiation have been found inside plaintiff’s home. 34. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff and his children have had convulsions almost at the same time. 35. At several times relevant to this case the intensity of radiation increases when plaintiff approaches his children and his pregnant wife. 36. On December 29, 2004, the intensity of radiation increased dramatically at the time plaintiff was with his wife during surgery during the birth of plaintiff’s daughter. 37. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff anticipates to his wife the screaming of his children when plaintiff approaches their bed at night. 38. At several times relevant to this case the intensity of radiation increases when plaintiff attempts to read stories to his children. 39. At several times relevant to this case, a meter has registered high intensities of ionizing radiation when plaintiff is driving, or walking with his children around the neighborhood. 40. At several times relevant to this case, the levels of radiation increase before the telephone rings, during telephone conversations, when plaintiff has visitors, before someone enters or exits plaintiff’s home, when plaintiff moves around inside plaintiff’s home, when plaintiff’s children or wife approach plaintiff, and when plaintiff is doing legal work. 41. At several times relevant to this case plaintiff feels pain and his children tremble on their sleep before the telephone rings. 42. At several times relevant a meter has shown several beams of radiation merging on plaintiff’s workbench. 43. The electronic aggression has prevented plaintiff to work on his repair shop. 44. The electronic aggression has prevented plaintiff from working or staying outside of his home. 45. At several times relevant to this case, plaintiff has found bleeding on stool, on urine and on saliva after exposures to intense radiation. 46. At several times relevant to this case, the intensity of radiation has increased during critical stages of the litigation impairing plaintiff’s ability to prosecute his claims. 47. Plaintiff moved to the home of Gustavo Ramirez to spare pain and suffering to his children. 48. The level of radiation in the area around Ramirez home increased after plaintiff moved into his place. 49. Days after plaintiff’s health aggravated while Ramirez complained of pain, while Ramirez’ brother-in- law complained of feeling his eyes about to pop out. 50. On February of 2003, plaintiff filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, a cause of action against the US Attorney General seeking an order to cease and desist from directing radiation into plaintiff and his family on the ground that the electronic aggression has caused severe physical harm to plaintiff and his children, and on the ground that plaintiff’s investigation is retaliation for bringing claims of discrimination and fraud against the Cooley defendants. Jesus Mendoza Maldonado v the US Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Case No. M 03-038. 51. US district Judge Ricardo Hinojosa assigned the case to US Magistrate Dorina Ramos. 52. The US Attorney General has not denied the fact that plaintiff is the subject of an investigation and active electronic surveillance. 53. At several times relevant to this case the US Attorney General, has claimed that others may be involved in electronic aggression of plaintiff, and has claimed that the federal government has no duty to protect plaintiff against these aggressions. 54. On April 4, 2003, judge Ramos reset the hearing scheduled for the same day impairing plaintiff’s ability to present expert and lay witness in support of immediate injunctive relief. 55. On April 7, 2003, plaintiff filed a motion to recuse judge Ramos on the ground that judge Ramos had ignored false statements made by the Cooley defendants to defraud of venue the district court and had ignored evidence of the legitimacy of plaintiff’s disability, displaying a deep-seated favoritism toward the Cooley defendants and a deep-seated antagonism toward plaintiff that made fair judgment impossible. 56. Judge Ramos recused herself and judge Hinojosa reversed judge Ramos recusal. 57. On May 15, 2003, plaintiff’s wife testified before judge Ramos to the swelling, pain, and breathing difficulties caused on plaintiff by exposure to electricity and how this has affected daily activities, to the suffering of their children when they are exposed to electromagnetic radiation inside their home, and as to how high readings on radiation meters inside the home decrease when plaintiff attempts to record the occurrence in a video camera. 58. Plaintiff’s brother testified as to the pain and suffering, experienced by Ramirez and Ramirez brother-in- law after plaintiff moved into Ramirez place. 59. Plaintiff’s wife, daughter, and brother testified before judge Ramos to plaintiff’s mental stability and law- abiding conduct. (Maldonado v Ashcroft, case No. M 03-038, Audiotape of hearing, Docket No. 29). 60. During the telephonic hearing, a dramatic increase of radiation aggravated plaintiff’s condition and plaintiff sought a continuance on defendant’s motion to dismiss. 61. Without a hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss judge Ramos issued a Report and Recommendation to dismiss plaintiff’s claims as frivolous. 62. Judge Ramos modified the testimony of plaintiff’s wife in which she testified to how high readings on radiation meters inside the home decrease when plaintiff attempts to record the occurrence in a video camera into: “Silvia Mendoza, who is Plaintiff’s wife, testified that Plaintiff’s has trouble breathing, among other things. She also testified that Plaintiff’s difficulty seems to subside when he operates a camera.” (Docket No. 32, at five, Statement of Evidence, Affidavit of plaintiff’s wife in which she denies giving that testimony, Docket No. 40, and audiotape of hearing, Docket No. 29 ).

Arabic Forum