كتب الكاتب الفاتح جبرا المتوفرة بمعرض الدوحة
|
|
 شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!!
|
بقلم محمد العوضي في جريدة الرأي العام الكويتية
" الملتحون عرف عنهم التشدد، وحرص الإعلام الغربي وفي مقدمه الإعلام الاميركي على التأكيد أنهم شريرون, أما الشقراء فهي صحافية انكليزية الأصل والفصل, باختصار انها (ايفون رايلي) التي اعتقلها نظام طالبان قبيل القصف الأميركي على افغانستان بأيام والتي زارتنا في الكويت الأسبوع الماضي بدعوة من مركز «الوعي» للعلاقات العربية الغربية، الذي يهدف الى فتح الحوار مع الغرب، ويدعو الى التعرف على حقيقة ما عندنا لا من خلال الاعلام وانما من خلال التواصل والحوار، ورغم ان عمر هذا المركز لم يتجاوز سنتين الا انه بذل جهوداً ايجابية واعلن اكثر من 90 فردا اسلامهم من خلاله.
الصحافية الانكليزية ايفون رايلي التي خطفت الاضواء أيام الحرب الاميركية على الافغان ألقت محاضرة ممتعة الاسبوع الماضي في المركز تحكي فيها قصة اعتقالها من البداية الى النهاية، وماذا خرجت من هذه التجربة من مفاهيم وانطباعات,,, عن اشياء كثيرة بما فيها مهمة الاعلام والاعلاميين ما شكل لها انقلابا وثورة على كثير مما يجري في عالم السياسة والاقتصاد والدين وحقوق الانسان والدعاية المسيسة للجماهير وتضليل الشعوب,,, الخ.
أطالت رايلي الحديث عن المعاملة الغريبة والحسنة والمبهرة لحركة طالبان تجاهها، مدة الايام العشرة التي اعتقلت فيها, لقد ذكرت جرأتها عليهم وشتمها لهم وسخريتها منهم وتحديها لهم, واخيرا البصقة القوية التي قذفتها في وجه أحد محاوريها,,, كل هذا وغيره من الاهانات والتحدي لم يكن له اثر على رجال الطالبان الذين استمروا في حسن معاملتها, قالت: حتى عندما اكتشفوا من أول لحظة أنني انكليزية متخفية في لباس أفغانية بعد أن سقطت مني الكاميرا وفضحتني على الحدود,,, لم يفتشوني شخصيا بل استدعوا امرأة قامت بتفتيشي بعيدا عن أعين الرجال,,, عندما عرفوا من التحقيق معها انها ليست عدوا وعدوها باطلاق سراحها ووعدتهم هي بدورها أن تقرأ القرآن مصدر الاخلاق الاسلامية, تقول الشقراء الانكليزية التي اخفت شقار وجهها بحجابها بعد اسلامها ايفون رايلي: بعد اطلاق سراحي اجتمع مئات الصحافيين ينتظرون قنبلة تصريحاتي ضد الطالبان، فكان جوابي: لقد أحسنوا معاملتي فصدموا وخيم عليهم الصمت! ووفيت بوعدي وقرأت ترجمة القرآن، وتعرفت على الاسلام، ثم أسلمت, ختمت محاضرتها بخاتمة تقولها في كل بلد وفي كل لقاء، قالت: إنني ألقي محاضرتي عليكم باللبس الشرعي الاسلامي الذي اعطاني اياه نظام طالبان في السجن هناك, وأحمد الله أنني سجنت في نظام طالبان الذي يصفونه بالشرير، ولم أسجن في معتقل غوانتانامو أو أبوغريب للنظام الاميركي الديموقراطي كيلا يغطوا رأسي بكيس ويلبسوني مريولا برتقاليا، ويربطوا رقبتي بحزام ويجروني على الأرض بعد أن يعروني.
....
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: walid taha)
|
وماذا عن معاملة الملتحين لملايين لنساء من افغانستان نفسها؟؟
اليس ممكنا ان يكونوا قد خططوا لهذا الموقف بدهاء؟؟ وفضلوا ان يكسبوها وهم يعرفون انها "صحفية انجليزية" وصوتها "واصل للعالم لا محالة؟؟؟
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: bayan)
|
| Quote: منذ 1985 فى امريكا والى الان 2004 فى ماليزيا لم التقى بأفغانية غير محجبة |
أما أنا فكل اللآئي ألتقيت لم يرتدين الحجاب
| Quote: وانا هنا لا ادافع عن طالبان.. ولكن نذكر حقائق |
واضح...!!!!
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: Tumadir)
|
الأستاذة العزيزة تماضر
تحياتي ليك و كل سنة و إنتي طيبة
Quote: æãÇÐÇ Úä ãÚÇãáÉ ÇáãáÊÍíä áãáÇííä áäÓÇÁ ãä ÇÝÛÇäÓÊÇä äÝÓåÇ¿¿
ÇáíÓ ããßäÇ Çä íßæäæÇ ÞÏ ÎØØæÇ áåÐÇ ÇáãæÞÝ ÈÏåÇÁ¿¿ æÝÖáæÇ Çä íßÓÈæåÇ æåã íÚÑÝæä ÇäåÇ "ÕÍÝíÉ ÇäÌáíÒíÉ" æÕæÊåÇ "æÇÕá ááÚÇáã áÇ ãÍÇáÉ¿¿¿ |
في رأيي أن الأخ walid taha كتب ما كتب ليبين أن الأصل في الإسلام هو المعاملة السمحة و ما ذكرتيه قد يحدث بالفعل و قد يكون جارياً الآن لكن هل هو الأصل ، لماذا نرمي الإسلام و المسلمين بكل ما هو قبيح لتصرفات جماعية كانت أو فردية تمثل من قاموا بها فقط ولا تمثل بأي حال من الأحوال دين أبائنا و أجدادنا دين محمد الدين الحق ، فما كل ملتحً مؤمناً و مخلصاً لله و لرسوله .
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: Tumadir)
|
| Quote: وتعرفت على الاسلام، ثم أسلمت |
هاهو دهاء طالبان يؤتى أُكله..
ان تسلم صحفية انجليزية ..احسب انه فاق توقع اهل طالبان انفسهم...
وهاهو صوت الاسلام وتسامحه يصل العالم ايض%
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: walid taha)
|
أتق الله حيث ما كنت واتبع السيئة الحسنة تمحها وخالق الناس بخلق حسن
الله اكبر الله اكبر
سبحان الله و الحمد لله واستفر الله, اللهم تب علينا يارب إنك أنت التواب الرحيم
وَرَأَيْتَ النَّاسَ يَدْخُلُونَ فِي دِينِ اللَّهِ أَفْوَاجاً (النصر : 2 )فَسَبِّحْ بِحَمْدِ رَبِّكَ وَاسْتَغْفِرْهُ إِنَّهُ كَانَ تَوَّاباً (النصر : 3 )
والله هذا الدين كل يوم في عز ومضي و تقدم
الحمد لله رب العالمين أن هدانا لهذا الدين وما كنا لنهتدي لولا أن هدانا الله
_____
أتق الله حيث ما كنت واتبع السيئة الحسنة تمحها وخالق الناس بخلق حسن
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: walid taha)
|
لماذا (و ما إمكن ... و ما إمكن). أليس الأهون و الأكثر منطقية أن نقول إن تمثل أخلاق الإسلام له فعل السحر في النفوس. و جزى الله هؤلاء الذين قاموا بهذا العمل خيرا على ما عملوا. و أن ندعو الله ليهدي هؤلاء الذين يعكسون وجها قبيحا للإسلام.
و يا جني...
ليس كل الناس معروضين للبيع. ألا (يعقل) أن يكون الإسلام دينا جذابا فعلا؟
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: Elawad)
|
العوض
علاء الدين
تحياتى
هنالك بالطبع فرق كبير بين "سماحة الاسلام" و"قباحة الطالبان" فى تقييمى الشخصى
ولن اتغاضى .. عن الثانية ...من اجل الاولى ..
فالاشياء هنا ..فى حالة الشقراء والملتحون رهينة ببعضها البعض..وواضحة الملمح والمسعى
واظن الممارسات اللاانسانية التى تمارس باسم الاسلام من الطالبان او ما "يلتحون" "لحيهم"
قد نوقشت كثيرا..فى هذا المنبر ...انا لن اضف لما قيل.. الا القليل
سا سمى الاشياء بمسمياتها..الحقيقية..
وساعطى لنفسى الحق فى ان اشك فى نوايا الطالبان.ومن حذا حذوهم .لتاريخ طويل من الاطلاع والتعرف على هويتهم المريبة.
ولكم الحق نفسه فى الاعتقاد: المع او المضاد
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: Tumadir)
|
Afghan Women No Better Off; US accused of not fulfilling promises
Chicago-Tribune , Sep.23, 2004
By SARAH FRANK
WASHINGTON - (KRT) -Human rights organizations criticized the Bush administration Wednesday, saying in the three years since the Taliban was ousted from most of Afghanistan, the United Stateshas not fulfilled promises of safety, freedom, education and health care for Afghan women.
"They have failed, misguided and betrayed Afghan women by giving them false hope," said T. Kumar, an Amnesty International advocacy director for Asiaand the Pacific, at a news conference addressing Afghan women's issues. "Three years later, they are still dreaming, and it may be a pipe dream."
Kumar said he believed the Bush administration "used the Afghan women" when it said liberating them was a major reason to remove the Taliban from power. He contends that Afghan women's rights were never a concern of the Bush administration until after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"The truth is that Afghan women are in danger of slipping into a sinkhole being created by ongoing violence and lack of funding," said Ritu Sharma, executive director of Women's Edge Coalition, at a press conference hosted by the National Press Club on Wednesday.
Since the fall of the Taliban, violence has been the order of the day. Warlords have imposed Taliban-like restrictions on women. Those women who attempt to exercise their rights are subject to threats and intimidation, several activists said.
Moreover, the Taliban itself is re-emerging and gaining strength, said T. Kumar, director for Asia and the Pacific for Amnesty International USA.
Mrs. Sharma explained that they received reports that women and girls are being subjected to rapes, beatings, kidnappings and other forms of intimidation that are preventing them from going to their jobs or schools, registering to vote or just going about their daily business.
THE WASHINGTON TIMES, Sep.24, 2004
On Oct. 9, Afghan citizens are scheduled to elect a leader. Millions of women are registered to vote, and most of the 19 presidential candidates have women's issues as one focus of their political platform, Kumar said.
But there is minimal voter education in Afghanistan, and many women are expected to vote the same as their husbands or not at all, said Malaly Volpi, director of the Policy Council on Afghan Women.
The organization works to ensure Afghan women's organizations receive sufficient international funding. Its volunteers also have been registering voters and educate them about the election process.
"Ninety percent of Afghan women are illiterate. How will they know who to vote for?" she said.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush ordered troops to Afghanistanto drive out the Taliban, which had harbored al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Bush said the war also would mean freedom for Afghan women, who had few rights under the Taliban. Since then, "remarkable progress" has been made, said White House spokesman Jim Morrell.
"The fact is, President Bush has made the rights of Afghan women a cornerstone of all U.S.humanitarian efforts in that region," he said. "Now, Afghan women are playing an active role in the government."
"Afghan women are not doing as well as many want to believe," said Ritu Sharma, executive director for Washington-based advocacy group Women's Edge Coalition. "The administration is not putting its money where its message is."
Lack of security and an increase in sexual violence against Afghan women have made it nearly impossible for them to get jobs or attend school, Sharma said.
Sharma said most of the problems that remain could be solved with increased funding.
Since 2001, the United Stateshas provided Afghanistanwith more than $2.5 billion to rebuild the country, with about $72 million set aside for Afghan women, or less than 1 percent.
Sharma and other advocates say closer to 30 percent of aid should be designated for women.
US funds for Afghan women have been used to train female teachers, build women's dormitories at universities in Kabul, start literacy programs and register women to vote and work as poll workers next month. Some has also been targeted for health care and helping women learn to manage their own money.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: Tumadir)
|
New York Times (Editorial), July 15, 2004
Afghanistan's coming elections are in jeopardy, and not just because of a revived Taliban. The warlord armies that Washington used to oust the Taliban in 2001 now pose an even greater danger, as Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, made plain this week to Carlotta Gall and David Rohde of The Times. President Bush is largely responsible for this situation, having first decided to fight the war against the Taliban on the cheap and then leaving the job of nation-building undone while he diverted American forces to Iraq. Now the administration must heed Mr. Karzai's warning and do much more to help him curb these private armies and the exploding opium business that finances them.
Mr. Bush's blunders in Afghanistan followed decades of shortsighted American policies that built up the power of these warlords. Many of them got their start in the American-financed guerrilla movement that forced Soviet occupation troops out of Afghanistan a decade and a half ago. Soon after, they began fighting one another, terrorizing civilians and opening the way for the Taliban.
The warlords got an unexpected chance to rebuild their power when the Bush administration chose to rely mainly on their private armies to eject the Taliban from Kabul in late 2001. After the war, with the Pentagon already intent on sending troops to Iraq, the United States kept only a limited combat force to battle Taliban fighters and their local allies in southeastern Afghanistan, leaving Mr. Karzai largely at the mercy of the warlords.
Moving effectively against the warlords will be difficult now that the United States has allowed the situation to deteriorate so far. Together they have far more troops than Mr. Karzai's nascent national army, and he has been forced to cut dangerous short-term deals with them. The first step should be to mobilize international pressure against one or two of the most notorious warlords, in the hope that others will get the message and fall in line.
The warlords and private militias who were once regarded as the west's staunchest allies in Afghanistan are now a greater threat to the country's security than the Taliban, according to the interim president, Hamid Karzai.
The Guardian (London), July 13, 2004
A prime target should be Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, a militant Islamist, long backed by Saudi Arabia, whose fighters have been responsible for multiple human rights abuses and war crimes over the years, including a 1993 massacre of civilians in Kabul. At this year's constitutional assembly, he was prominent among those trying to intimidate delegates, particularly women. The constitution that ultimately emerged struck an uneasy balance between secular liberties and harsh Islamic strictures. Now Mr. Sayyaf and his armed followers are trying to make sure that Afghanistan's highest court interprets the constitution in accordance with their fiercely fundamentalist views. Mr. Sayyaf's private army gives him the power to impose his nominees for security and judicial positions. Disarming his followers should be an international priority.
Another dangerous warlord is Marshal Muhammad Qasim Fahim, who, in addition to being the government's defense minister, commands a private army of at least 50,000 fighters. Mr. Fahim hopes to be Mr. Karzai's vice-presidential running mate in the election now scheduled for October. He should not be allowed to do so unless he disarms his private militia, a step he has repeatedly resisted.
To curb the warlords further, NATO should expand its peacekeeping role. New jobs also need to be found for those now making their living as fighters for hire. There is no need to extend the area of American combat operations. Even in the southeast, where the United States has concentrated its military efforts, the results have been mixed at best. The Taliban have never been thoroughly routed, and local resentment over the long-term presence of foreign forces and claims of errant bombs that kill civilians seems to be creating new recruits.
Ultimate victory in Afghanistan requires an effective national government, freed from both the Taliban and the warlords.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: شقراء..وسط الملتحين!!!! (Re: bayan)
|
Rule of the rapists
Britain and the US said war on Afghanistan would liberate women. We are still waiting
Mariam Rawi in Kabul
When the US began bombing Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, the oppression of Afghan women was used as a justification for overthrowing the Taliban regime. Five weeks later America's first lady, Laura Bush, stated triumphantly: "Because of our recent military gains in much of Afghanistan, women are no longer imprisoned in their homes. The fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women."
However, Amnesty International paints a rather different picture: "Two years after the ending of the Taliban regime, the international community and the Afghan transitional administration, led by President Hamid Karzai, have proved unable to protect women. The risk of rape and sexual violence by members of armed factions and former combatants is still high. Forced marriage, particularly of girl children, and violence against women in the family are widespread in many areas of the country."
In truth, the situation of women in Afghanistan remains appalling. Though girls and women in Kabul, and some other cities, are free to go to school and have jobs, this is not the case in most parts of the country. In the western province of Herat, the warlord Ismail Khan imposes Taliban-like decrees. Many women have no access to education and are banned from working in foreign NGOs or UN offices, and there are hardly any women in government offices. Women cannot take a taxi or walk unless accompanied by a close male relative. If seen with men who are not close relatives, women can be arrested by the "special police" and forced to undergo a hospital examination to see if they have recently had sexual intercourse. Because of this continued oppression, every month a large number of girls commit suicide - many more than under the Taliban.
Women's rights fare no better in northern and southern Afghanistan, which are under the control of the Northern Alliance. One international NGO worker told Amnesty International: "During the Taliban era, if a woman went to market and showed an inch of flesh she would have been flogged; now she's raped."
Even in Kabul, where thousands of foreign troops are present, Afghan women do not feel safe, and many continue to wear the burka for protection. In some areas where girls' education does exist, parents are afraid to allow their daughters to take advantage of it following the burning down of several girls' schools. Girls have been abducted on the way to school and sexual assaults on children of both sexes are now commonplace, according to Human Rights Watch.
In spite of its rhetoric, the Karzai government actively pursues policies that are anti-women. Women cannot find jobs, and girls' schools often lack the most basic materials, such as books and chairs. There is no legal protection for women, and the older legal systems prohibit them from getting help when they need it. Female singers are not allowed on Kabul television, and women's songs are not played, while scenes in films of women not wearing the hijab are censored.
The Karzai government has established a women's ministry just to throw dust in the eyes of the international community. In reality, this ministry has done nothing for women. There are complaints that money given to the women's ministry by foreign NGOs has been taken by powerful warlords in the Karzai cabinet.
The "war on terror" toppled the Taliban regime, but it has not removed religious fundamentalism, which is the main cause of misery for Afghan women. In fact, by bringing the warlords back to power, the US has replaced one misogynist fundamentalist regime with another.
But then the US never did fight the Taliban to save Afghan women. As recently as May 2001 the US administration gave the Taliban $43m as a reward for reducing the opium harvest. Now the US supports the Northern Alliance, which was responsible for killing more than 50,000 civilians during its bloody rule in the 1990s. Those in power today - men such as Karim Khalili, Rabbani, Sayyaf, Fahim, Yunus Qanooni, Mohaqiq and Abdullah - were those who imposed anti-women restrictions as soon as they took control in 1992 and started a reign of terror throughout Afghanistan. Thousands of women and girls were systematically raped by armed thugs, and many committed suicide to avoid being sexually assaulted by them.
But lack of women's rights is not the only problem facing Afghanistan today. Neither opium cultivation nor warlordism and terrorism have been uprooted. There is no peace, stability or security. President Karzai is a prisoner within his own government, the nominal head of a regime in which former Northern Alliance commanders hold the real power. In such a climate, the results of the forthcoming elections in June can easily be predicted: the Northern Alliance will once againhijack the results to give legitimacy to its bloody rule.
In November 2001 Colin Powell, the US secretary of state, said: "The rights of women in Afghanistan will not be negotiable." But the women of Afghanistan have felt with their whole bodies the dishonesty of such statements from US and British leaders - we know that they have already negotiated away women's rights in Afghanistan by imposing the most treacherous warlords on the people. Their pretty speeches are made out of political expediency rather than genuine concern.
From 1992 to 2001 Afghan women were treated as cattle by all brands of fundamentalists, from jihadis to the Taliban. Some western writers have tried to suggest that this oppression has its roots in Afghan traditions and that it is disrespectful of "cultural difference" to criticise it. Yet Afghan women themselves are not silent victims. There is resistance, but you have to look for it, as any serious anti-fundamentalist group has to work semi-underground. The Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), which was outlawed under the Taliban, still can't open an office in Kabul. We still can't distribute our magazine Payam-e-Zan (Women's Message) openly. Shopkeepers are still threatened with death for stocking our publications, and RAWA supporters have been tortured and imprisoned for distributing them. People who are caught reading our literature are still in danger.
Feminism does not need to be imported; it has already taken root in Afghanistan. Long before the US bombing, progressive organisations were trying to establish freedom, democracy, secularism and women's rights. Then, western governments and media showed little interest in the plight of Afghan women. When, before September 11 2001, RAWA gave footage of the execution of Zarmeena to the BBC, CNN, ABC and others, it was told that the footage was too shocking to broadcast. However, after September 11 these same media organisations aired the footage repeatedly. Similarly, some of RAWA's photographs documenting the Taliban's abuses of women were also used - without our permission. They were reproduced as flyers and dropped by American warplanes as they flew over Afghanistan.
This piece first appeared in New Internationalist magazine (www.newint.org)
Mariam Rawi, a member of the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan, is writing under a pseudonym www.rawa.org
From: http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1146134,00.html[/B]
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
walid taha
Tumadir
jini
bayan
mohammed alfadla
علاء الدين يوسف علي محمد
Frankly
Elawad
فيس بوك
تويتر
انستقرام
يوتيوب
بنتيريست