الأرهابي صلاح جادات يكذب كذب صراح!

Quote: يا بريمة قريت الكلام المحمّرو وما فهمت علاقته شنو بفرضيتك القلتها عن تأثرك كمواطن أمريكي بالقرار الجديد!!

Quote: By ERICA WERNER, AP Congressional Correspondent WASHINGTON (AP) — Top GOP lawmakers accused the Obama administration Wednesday of ignoring congressional intent and the spirit of the law in offering reassurances to Iran about new visa rules. "There is no ambiguity," said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California. "The administration should follow the law as written and agreed to." At issue is a new law tightening visa-free travel to the U.S., enacted as part of a sprawling spending bill passed overwhelmingly by Congress last week and signed by President Barack Obama. The legislation, a response to the Paris terror attacks, deals with the "visa waiver" program that allows the citizens of 38 countries to travel to the U.S. without obtaining a visa. It makes a series of changes, including requiring a visa for anyone who's visited Iraq, Syria, Iran or Sudan in the previous five years, as well as dual nationals with citizenship in any of those countries. This could make travel back and forth to the U.S. more difficult for Iranian-Americans or for Europeans with business dealings in Iran. Iranian leaders complained in recent days that the new requirements contradict elements of the landmark nuclear deal reached earlier this year with Iran, the U.S. and five world powers, under which Iran must curb its nuclear program in exchange for relief from international sanctions. The agreement also committed the signing nations to refrain from policies adversely affecting normalization of trade and economic relations with Iran. In response, Secretary of State John Kerry offered assurances in a letter to his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif that the new rules would not impact legitimate Iranian business interests and suggested they could be waived. That has led to criticism from top House Republicans who say they contemplated no such waiver. The law includes waivers for military and official government travel, but not for business travel. Republican aides say the Homeland Security Department initially sought a business exception but lawmakers rebuffed the request. In a letter to Kerry and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson released Wednesday, McCarthy and several House committee chairmen said they are "deeply concerned" the administration would try to apply waiver authority to those who've traveled to Iran for business purposes. "This letter serves to dispel any notion that the congressional intent would allow the waiver authority to be used for business travels," they wrote. Questioned on the issue this week, spokespeople for the State Department and the Homeland Security Department declined to say whether the administration would indeed seek to waive elements of the law in response to the Iranian concerns. "We will carry out the law that Congress passed and the president signed," Homeland Security spokesman S.Y. Lee said in a statement Wednesday. "At this time, no determination has been made as to how the waiver provision would be implemented." The dispute over Iran comes as civil libertarians and European Union officials express concern about unintended consequences of the law on tens of thousands of dual nationals — for example, European citizens born in the affected countries, who would now face new hurdles in traveling to the U.S. But Congress looks unlikely to revisit the issue. ___= Associated Press writer Matthew Lee contributed to this report. Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Quote: t makes a series of changes, including requiring a visa for anyone who's visited Iraq, Syria, Iran or Sudan in the previous five years, as well as dual nationals with citizenship in any of those countries.

Quote: يا بريمة هل حصل سمعت لك سوداني راجع السودان من السعودية مثلا مشى السفارة السودانية وأخد تأشيرة دخول للسودان؟؟

Quote: CONGRESS JUST PUT IRANIAN-AMERICANS AND OTHERS AT RISK FOR BECOMING SECOND-CLASS CITIZENS Murtaza Hussain Dec. 18 2015, 4:27 p.m. TODAY BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS approved a $1.1 trillion spending bill intended to keep government services funded through September 2016. Tucked into this omnibus legislation are provisions that could undermine, on the basis of personal heritage, the ability of many American citizens to travel visa-free to countries in Europe and east Asia. For more than 25 years, the Visa Waiver Program has allowed people from a select list of countries, currently 38 nations long, to travel to the U.S. without a visa. Those countries, in turn, must reciprocate, allowing Americans the same privilege on their own soil. Today, Congress voted to change the deal: People coming from countries covered under the Visa Waiver Program, including people who are citizens of those countries, will now need to get a visa if they are determined to be nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, and Syria, or if they have visited those countries since 2011. This is worse than it sounds, because at least two of those countries, Iran and Syria, deem people to be nationals, regardless of where they were born or live, if their fathers are citizens. So it’s possible that someone who is a citizen of one of the countries on the visa-free travel list — the United Kingdom, say — and who lives there and grew up there and has never visited another country, could end up denied entry to the U.S. because of a parent born in Iran or Syria. It gets even worse still, because there is a strong likelihood that countries party to the newly altered Visa Waiver Program, including European Union member states, will institute reciprocal restrictions on Americans, meaning that many Iranian-Americans, Syrian-Americans, and others in the U.S. would see their ability to travel the world seriously degraded based on ancestry or dual citizenship. Potentially facing similar reciprocal restrictions are any aid workers, journalists, or other Americans who simply visited at some point since 2011 the countries targeted in the new legislation. An open letter published by the European Union’s ambassador to the United States has already said that passage of the bill “could trigger legally mandated reciprocal measures” against American citizens, in this case, specifically those whose national origin is from Iran, Sudan, Syria, or Iraq, effectively placing them into a lower category of citizenship when attempting to travel abroad. The new restrictions have alarmed civil rights groups in the United States, including the American Civil Liberties Union, which in a letter to the House of Representatives earlier this month called the changes arbitrary, discriminatory, and “un-American,” since they would punish individuals solely based on their nationality or ethnic origin. Despite this harsh criticism, at least some of the provisions were approved by the House of Representatives in a 407-19 vote on December 8, paving the way for today’s vote. Jamal Abdi, a spokesperson for the National Iranian American Council, believes the legislation will eventually prompt other countries to deny Iranian-Americans the same rights of free travel enjoyed by other Americans. “Targeting people who are dual nationals is particularly discriminatory and unjust, since dual nationality is not something you choose,” Abdi said. “Under this legislation, if you’re a European of Iranian origin or your father is an Iranian citizen, you wouldn’t be able to travel without a visa to the United States. As we’ve already heard from the EU, this would trigger reciprocal measures that would result in the passports of Iranian-Americans being treated as inferior, essentially putting them in a category of second-class citizenship.” The bill approved by the House earlier this month, HR-158, which is related to the legislation approved today, was initially written for the narrow and reasonable purpose of blocking or restricting from U.S. entry individuals who traveled to Islamic State-controlled territory in Syria or Iraq. But provisions later added by Republican lawmakers made the legislation more draconian, including by imposing restrictions involving entire countries — official “state sponsors of terrorism” like Iran and Sudan. (In those two countries, at least, the Islamic State is nonexistent.) Some parts of the newly passed legislation could even violate the recently negotiated deal between the U.S. and Iran to curb Iranian nuclear activity. For example, under the new rules, a European or Japanese business owner who traveled to Iran to take advantage of recently lifted economic sanctions would thereafter find themselves denied visa-free entry to the United States — a restriction that would inevitably act as a deterrent to doing business in Iran. But the provisions of the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal prohibit policies that undermine “the normalization of trade and economic relations with Iran.” Thirty-three Democratic members of Congress signed an open letter published last week criticizing some of the new Visa Waiver Program restrictions. The letter said the restrictions “would result in discrimination against people simply because they are dual citizens based on ancestry” and asserted that national origin should not be a factor when determining visa requirements. People entering the United States, the letter said, should be evaluated on an individual level, not based on “where their parents are from.” In the end, those objections were not enough to stop the new rules. Abdi said that politicians have stoked fears of immigration and helped increase public support for harsh laws that target en masse individuals from Muslim-majority countries. “This bill is a direct response to the rhetoric of GOP leaders like Donald Trump and others who have called for restricting people coming to the United States based on national origin,” Abdi said. “There has been a lot of outcry about his outrageous comments and proposals from the public and in the media, but now as a consequence of the environment he’s helped create, we’re actually seeing Congress take steps to turn such xenophobic ideas into law.” CONTACT THE AUTHOR: Murtaza Hussain ✉murtaza.hussain@​theintercept.com t@mazmhussain

Quote: يا عبار. القانون ده هل بيشمل كندا ولا لا ؟ لو بيشمل كندا، الجماعة بتاعين الحوار ديل بعد كده إلا بي فيزا، وصديقك محمد النور كبر أيضا كان في السودان قريب، برضو ممكن يشملوا نفس القانون.

Quote: Today, Congress voted to change the deal: People coming from countries covered under the Visa Waiver Program, including people who are citizens of those countries, will now need to get a visa if they are determined to be nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, and Syria, or if they have visited those countries since 2011.

Quote: الخنيث بريمة كترت ضرب جادات خلتك بتهلوس بجادات ليل نهار وده حالتو لسع جادات ما قابلك وجها لوجه يعني بقي من ضمن مهام السفارات الامريكية منح التاشيرة لمواطنيها الامريكان ها ها ها جنس عبط وغباء ليس له مثيل ولكنك معذور : كترت الضرب العليك - جادات لو ما طردك من امريكا ونزع الجواز منك ما حايرتاح - اها منو البكذب كذب صراح - المتداخلين كلهم طلعوك كذاب - البوست بقي وبال عليك لانك منافق

Quote: هنالك سوابق لمواطنين أمريكان تم منعهم من السفر، وهم كانوا قادمين للولايات المتحدة، وذلك بسبب أنهم كانو في قائمة المحظورين من ركوب الطائرات. وهنالك أمريكي من أصول صومالية تم منعه من ركوب الطائرة ولقد كان في طريقه للولايات المتحدة. وأعتقد أنه عاد لأمريكا بعد أن تم شطب أسمه من تلك القائمة.

Quote: الخنيث بريمة

Quote: والله أنا مستغرب، بريمة ببلاهته هذه كيف قدر يقطع المحيطات ويصل أمريكا؟! زول قاعد في أمريكا وناس السودان وناس السعودية وناس الإمارات في البوست دا بفهموهو قوانين أمريكا وما قادر يفهم!! حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل المشكلة مافي كونو ما فاهم القوانين، المشكلة في إنو مافاهم كلمة جواز سفر تعني شنو؟! ولا فاهم معنى كلمة إقامة (قرين كارد) والله دا أبلد إنسان مر علي في حياتي والله فقع مرارتي عديل كدا

Quote: بريمة الخنيث البوست بقي ليك مشنقة .. وانت لو فيك ذرة رجولة كان جيت دافعت عن عرضك يا ديوث .. وزي ما قلت ليك طال الزمن او قصر فبينا دم - وزي ما قلت ليك في الخاص شفت شنو ... خلاك تهرب الي امريكا