زرقة دارفور: التسوى كريت فى القرض تلقى فى جلدها!

Quote: Arab Race Zeal Expel Darfurians from the Gulf By Dr. El Taher El Faki – London – U.K. The attitudes of the Arab world towards Darfur problem are appalling. The Arabs consider Darfur problem a threat to their ethnicity in general and at the very worst possibility a means to the destruction of Arab identity in Sudan. Reports of systematic expulsion of Darfurian elites and business men from the rich Arab countries are unfolding. Of more concern, though, are the ethnic issues that signify classical targeting of Darfurians by the Arab countries and a hatred that will not recede any time soon. There is a sense of urgency on our side to confront the Arab world with their failure to recognize that they are engaged in actions against Darfurian civilians in the Gulf and conducting their behaviours on the rule of the jungle. By this we mean their unconditional support to the government of Sudan (GoS) at all costs against Darfur people. Arabs and Muslims alike have failed so far to identify or distinguish between two kinds of zeal they are engaged upon, the first being their ethnic superiority illusions over black Darfurians and the second is for their cultural survival and domination. Since Darfur society is entirely Muslims, there is very little room for manoeuvring the religious issue. It certainly remained to be one factor and that is the ethnic one. The Arabs thus consider the Darfur Problem as a threat and a real challenge to their own survival as Arab race. They mull over their actions as defence mechanisms. For so long the Arabs continue to acknowledge that Islamic expansion into Africa and elsewhere have produced cultural, personal and political changes among the new societies to accept the domination of Arab race and practicing Islamic rituals as something different. It remained in the Arab minds that their race presides on their divine rights as Arabs and the capitulation of the conquered to their race to be seen as natural. If the conquered or the converted peoples ventured to seek equal rights then they are considered a threat to both Islam and consequently Arab ethnicity in general. Arab Imperialism in Darfur has remained to present day distinct from that of the British or the French as a single –minded expansion of Religion and race intertwined. The Arabs describe their expansion as Islamic while the English and French left religion for the clergies. Arabs take for granted that their empire remains envisioned by Allah. In this sense any struggles for peace, justice and equality that jeopardise Arabs as race is considered a threat to Islam even among the most pious. Arab race expansion in Darfur and perhaps the rest of Sudan is more potent than the expansion of Islam because the concept of separating the sacred from the profane remained to present day on the association of the converted to Arab race first. While the British and the French went about annexing Africa and other parts of the world for earthly and material benefits than for spiritual dominance allowing the missionaries and the clergies to propagate faith, the Arabs on the contrary took over the functions of both the clergies and the masters at the same time. This phenomenon eventually led to protecting Arab race at all expenses irrespective of religion or geographic boundaries. Accordingly, this explains the willingness of the Arabs to support those in power who seek to preserve the domination of the Arab race such as the GoS. The Arab solidarity with the Sudanese regime that has been indicted by the international community with gross human rights atrocities and genocides among the Muslims in Darfur remain testimony to its fanatic race protection at all costs. The rhetoric that the Arab Islamic world is working for the larger community of the Muslims to unite and bring together all of those separated by geographical boundaries is totally lacking. In this sense it is easy to explain the relation of the Arab regimes with the Sudanese dictatorial system against the victims of Darfur. Further on, the Arab regimes find themselves obliged to go along with the Sudanese claims that the Arab Nation is in real threat hitting the tones that stimulate defensive ethnic Arabs immediate responses. The Sudanese government worked hard to explain to the Arabs that Darfur problem is but a small tribal conflict over a camel which the Arabs culturally and historically understand, and very difficult for the rest of the world to comprehend. This tactic played well to the advantage of GoS by rallying the Arab community behind it. Furthermore, the continuous GoS accusations of America and Israel as instigators of the rebellion in Darfur blunted the Arab vision on the facts behind the roots of Darfur problem. It therefore became easy for the agents of the GoS to convince the Arab states that the presence of active Darfurian elites in their territories is not only a threat to the GoS but a genuine threat to Arab existence as race. The Arabs failed to see the Darfurians as different stocks of the Islamic world they already know. And this mistake turned out to be fatal in the long term between Arab and Darfurian relations. The Arab regimes are targeting merely the victims of an evil Sudanese system. The corrupt Arab regimes continue to overlook the behaviour and fanaticism of a pro-Arab regime in Sudan driven by their blind faith in ethnic Arab domination. The end result is the apparent direction the Arabs seek to find reasonable and humane response to the Darfur problem that fits within their doctrines of reason and persuasions. Unfortunately for both the Arab world and Darfurians, the response came from the GoS that advised the expulsion of all Darfurians who actually or potentailly cause threats to Arab race in Darfur and accordingly to the Arab race as a whole. This way of thinking is unique to the Arabs. Muslims on the other hand along with the Arab community believe that that problem has some dirty Western hands in it and their support to fellow Muslims in Darfur remains poor. Arab race zeal is the basic principle in their response to the Darfur problem. From the early days of Islamic expansions Arabs continued to reject anything that threatens or subverts their supremacy as race and not as Muslims. While Islamic religion calls for all Muslims to forsake family, race, property, children, parents and dear life for Islam the Arabs failed to support of Darfurians in their current misery and plight. The international community is supposed to look into this matter as urgent. The human rights charter forbids subjugation of societies according to race. Darfurians in the Gulf and Arab countries are victims of race.

Quote: Arab Race Zeal Expel Darfurians from the Gulf By Dr. El Taher El Faki – London – U.K. The attitudes of the Arab world towards Darfur problem are appalling. The Arabs consider Darfur problem a threat to their ethnicity in general and at the very worst possibility a means to the destruction of Arab identity in Sudan. Reports of systematic expulsion of Darfurian elites and business men from the rich Arab countries are unfolding. Of more concern, though, are the ethnic issues that signify classical targeting of Darfurians by the Arab countries and a hatred that will not recede any time soon. There is a sense of urgency on our side to confront the Arab world with their failure to recognize that they are engaged in actions against Darfurian civilians in the Gulf and conducting their behaviours on the rule of the jungle. By this we mean their unconditional support to the government of Sudan (GoS) at all costs against Darfur people.

(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 06:24 AM)

Quote: Arabs and Muslims alike have failed so far to identify or distinguish between two kinds of zeal they are engaged upon, the first being their ethnic superiority illusions over black Darfurians and the second is for their cultural survival and domination.

Quote: Since Darfur society is entirely Muslims, there is very little room for manoeuvring the religious issue. It certainly remained to be one factor and that is the ethnic one. The Arabs thus consider the Darfur Problem as a threat and a real challenge to their own survival as Arab race. They mull over their actions as defence mechanisms. For so long the Arabs continue to acknowledge that Islamic expansion into Africa and elsewhere have produced cultural, personal and political changes among the new societies to accept the domination of Arab race and practicing Islamic rituals as something different. It remained in the Arab minds that their race presides on their divine rights as Arabs and the capitulation of the conquered to their race to be seen as natural. If the conquered or the converted peoples ventured to seek equal rights then they are considered a threat to both Islam and consequently Arab ethnicity in general.

(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 00:20 AM)

Quote: Arab Imperialism in Darfur has remained to present day distinct from that of the British or the French as a single –minded expansion of Religion and race intertwined. The Arabs describe their expansion as Islamic while the English and French left religion for the clergies. Arabs take for granted that their empire remains envisioned by Allah. In this sense any struggles for peace, justice and equality that jeopardise Arabs as race is considered a threat to Islam even among the most pious. Arab race expansion in Darfur and perhaps the rest of Sudan is more potent than the expansion of Islam because the concept of separating the sacred from the profane remained to present day on the association of the converted to Arab race first.

(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 00:24 AM)
(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 01:59 AM)

Quote: While the British and the French went about annexing Africa and other parts of the world for earthly and material benefits than for spiritual dominance allowing the missionaries and the clergies to propagate faith, the Arabs on the contrary took over the functions of both the clergies and the masters at the same time. This phenomenon eventually led to protecting Arab race at all expenses irrespective of religion or geographic boundaries. Accordingly, this explains the willingness of the Arabs to support those in power who seek to preserve the domination of the Arab race such as the GoS.

Quote: The Arab solidarity with the Sudanese regime that has been indicted by the international community with gross human rights atrocities and genocides among the Muslims in Darfur remain testimony to its fanatic race protection at all costs. The rhetoric that the Arab Islamic world is working for the larger community of the Muslims to unite and bring together all of those separated by geographical boundaries is totally lacking. In this sense it is easy to explain the relation of the Arab regimes with the Sudanese dictatorial system against the victims of Darfur. Further on, the Arab regimes find themselves obliged to go along with the Sudanese claims that the Arab Nation is in real threat hitting the tones that stimulate defensive ethnic Arabs immediate responses.

Quote: The Sudanese government worked hard to explain to the Arabs that Darfur problem is but a small tribal conflict over a camel which the Arabs culturally and historically understand, and very difficult for the rest of the world to comprehend. This tactic played well to the advantage of GoS by rallying the Arab community behind it. Furthermore, the continuous GoS accusations of America and Israel as instigators of the rebellion in Darfur blunted the Arab vision on the facts behind the roots of Darfur problem. It therefore became easy for the agents of the GoS to convince the Arab states that the presence of active Darfurian elites in their territories is not only a threat to the GoS but a genuine threat to Arab existence as race.

Quote: The Arabs failed to see the Darfurians as different stocks of the Islamic world they already know. And this mistake turned out to be fatal in the long term between Arab and Darfurian relations. The Arab regimes are targeting merely the victims of an evil Sudanese system. The corrupt Arab regimes continue to overlook the behaviour and fanaticism of a pro-Arab regime in Sudan driven by their blind faith in ethnic Arab domination. The end result is the apparent direction the Arabs seek to find reasonable and humane response to the Darfur problem that fits within their doctrines of reason and persuasions.

(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 05:51 AM)

Quote: Unfortunately for both the Arab world and Darfurians, the response came from the GoS that advised the expulsion of all Darfurians who actually or potentailly cause threats to Arab race in Darfur and accordingly to the Arab race as a whole.

(عدل بواسطة Biraima M Adam on 01-20-2008, 05:59 AM)

Quote: This way of thinking is unique to the Arabs. Muslims on the other hand along with the Arab community believe that that problem has some dirty Western hands in it and their support to fellow Muslims in Darfur remains poor. Arab race zeal is the basic principle in their response to the Darfur problem. From the early days of Islamic expansions Arabs continued to reject anything that threatens or subverts their supremacy as race and not as Muslims. While Islamic religion calls for all Muslims to forsake family, race, property, children, parents and dear life for Islam the Arabs failed to support of Darfurians in their current misery and plight.

Quote: The international community is supposed to look into this matter as urgent. The human rights charter forbids subjugation of societies according to race. Darfurians in the Gulf and Arab countries are victims of race