Voice of the unheard & home to the homeless
Front Page  
 
 Latest News
 
 Articles and Analysies
 
 Press Releases
 
 Photo Gallery
 
 About Sudan
 
 Cards
 
  Sudanese Music
  Sudanese Links
  Discussion Board
 
  2006 News Archives
 
  2006 Articles Archives
  2006 Press R.Archives
 
  2005 News Archives
 
  2005 Articles Archives
  2005 Press R.Archives
  PC&Internet Forum
  Poll System
  Tell A Friend
  Upload Your Picture
  Contact Us


Search

Articles and Analysies Last Updated: Dec 20, 2009 - 3:34:53 PM

The Hague’s Dilemma: Ngok Dinka vs Ngok Dinka over Abyei By: Tut Gatwech, South Sudan ( new south sudan)
Sudaneseonline.com

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The Hague ’s Dilemma: Ngok Dinka vs Ngok Dinka over Abyei

By: Tut Gatwech, South Sudan ( new south sudan )

 

It seems that Sudanese in general and the Ngok-Dinka and Misseriya tribes in particular, are in agreement with the ruling in The Hague that defined the territory which constituted Abyei area of the nine Ngok-Dinka chiefdoms.

However, the two sides criticized the ruling to some degree with some of the Misseriya tribal leaders blaming the National Congress Party (NCP) for what they called a betrayal as their green land of water and pasture was taken by Ngok-Dinka. While on the other hand some of the Ngok-Dinka leaders criticized the court’s ruling on what they called their oil field of Heglig taken to the North.

But something also caught the attention of those present at The Hague ; and that was the division of the Ngok-Dinka themselves. Some were members of the SPLM delegates while some with the NCP delegates. It was clear that the Misseriya as a tribe was wholly backed by the NCP while the SPLM stood with the Ngok-Dinka during the court’s hearings. But it was also surprising that some chiefs of the Ngok-Dinka sided with the NCP to defend the position of Misseriya against their fellow Ngok-Dinka. No Misseriya chief sided with the SPLM to defend the position of Ngok-Dinka.

Even though one of these NCP’s Ngok-Dinka chiefs defected to SPLM’s Ngok-Dinka chiefs at The Hague, the rest that continued to remain with the NCP’s delegation for the rest of the court’s hearings presenting evidences against their fellow chiefs were believed to have harmed the evidences of the SPLM’s backed chiefs in submission of evidences.

Coming to the Heglig oil field (which is locally called ‘lich’ in Nuer or ‘panthou’ in Dinka) in Unity state, leaders of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) quickly corrected the misinterpretation of the court’s ruling by the National Congress Party as reported in the news after the ruling.

They said the court’s decision was not to define and demarcate the North-South borders through which the contested area of Heglig oil field was supposed to be resolved.

The ruling only defined what constituted Abyei area, and ownership of any other areas including Heglig and Bambo outside of Abyei’s territory was none of the court’s business.

To NCP, if Heglig oil field (lich or panthou), which Ngok-Dinka of Abyei claimed as theirs in the first place, had been found to be outside of Abyei territory by the court’s ruling, then it automatically became that of Southern Kordufan state in the North.

My understanding of the NCP’s argument is that if the SPLM agreed or allowed the Ngok-Dinka to claim Heglig oil field in the first place, then it meant or confirmed to them that the oil field was already in the North since Abyei’s territory was already in the North, and particularly in the state of Southern Kordufan. To them if Heglig didn’t fall within the newly redefined Abyei territory of Ngok-Dinka, then it automatically fell under the jurisdiction of the Greater Southern Kordufan state.

On the other hand, Heglig is claimed by the SPLM as belonging to Unity state. It has been a disputed oil field for all this time since 2005 between Southern Kordufan of the North and Unity state of the South. SPLM believes that the fate of the area in question will be resolved by the North-South Border Demarcation Committee.

The question is since the SPLM knew that Heglig oil field is contested between Southern Kordufan and Unity state, then why did the ruling party in the South allowed Ngok-Dinka of Abyei to claim it in the first place? If the SPLM leaders’ attitude was not to generate dispute between Unity state and Abyei over the claim of the oil field, and with the assumption that if Abyei owned it then it meant the South potentially owned it, they were wrong.

The SPLM should have told the Ngok-Dinka not to claim the Heglig oil field as theirs because the NCP would make this as a confirmation that it belonged to the North where Abyei territory is currently situated. And what if Abyei got the Heglig oil fields and votes to remain in the North during the referendum of 2011, how would the South legally get back the Heglig oil field to Unity state?

It was good that Edward Lino, former administrator of Abyei confirmed that Heglig never belonged to Abyei. But this confession is too late.

It was also misunderstood by those who thought that the ruling was about returning Abyei area to the South or confirming it to the North. No, the ruling was about defining and demarcating the areas of the nine Ngok-Dinka chiefdoms within the North as it is. If the people of nine Ngok-Dinka chiefdoms want to return to the South after more than 100 years in the North, it will be in the 2011 referendum where they will decide on their future political destiny.

Unless the Abyei Boundary Commission (ABC), on which the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague based its decision, claimed the Heglig oil field belonged to Abyei, there was no reason for The Hague court to rule over the fate of Heglig.

It is a known fact that the first report of ABC to Presidency was submitted in July 2005 before our late leader, Dr. John Garang de Mabior died. The NCP rejected it. But was the fate of the Heglig oil field included in the report? I doubt it.

The situation as of now indicates that the two parties, SPLM and NCP, will likely go back to The Hague over the Heglig oil fields plus other potential conflict areas after the North-South border demarcation report, unless they resolve the issues from within the country.

And I hope there will be no South Sudanese chiefs of Unity state defending the NCP’s North over the issues against Unity state as was unfortunately the case with the Abyei’s Ngok-Dinka vs Ngok-Dinka in The Hague.

 

Tut Gatwech is a youth member living in


© Copyright by SudaneseOnline.com


Please feel free to send us your Articles , Analysies news and press releases to [email protected]

Top of Page



This report does not necessarily reflect the views of Sudanese Online.com

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Articles and Analysies
  • Political Divorce a lesson for both the Sudan and the rest of Africa.By: Justin Ambago Ramba
  • China has been silent about the war in Darfur in order to reap the benefits from Sudanese oil and the sale of Chinese weapons to the Sudanese government by Jaafar Mirmar
  • Sleeping with the Devil:When the US goes the wrong way in Sudan by Ibrahim Ali Ibrahim -Washington, DC
  • South Sudan is never too young for an independent state By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Making Justice is a Political pinyana in south Sudan. By: Daniel Abushery Daniel
  • A letter to UN Secretary General by Dr. Mohamed Ali Mustafa
  • Kiir Promises Clean Water while the Food continues to come from Uganda. By: Justin Ambago Ramba
  • Why Egypt Threatens the Africans over their own Water By Izzadine Abdul Rasoul
  • Let the Debate Boil Down to the Referendum Not a Dead Unity!! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • No Negotiation with Al-Bashir Government even if the venue is in white House By: Abdellatif Abdelrahman
  • NCP: End this Ignoble Episode By Usman Ibn Foda-CRID, Abuja
  • Idriss Deby, The Ultimate Hater of South Sudanese! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • To Salva Kiir: Dont Fuel Athors Rebellion By Dr. James Okuk
  • Why NCP blackmails the AU, UN Forces in Darfur?By : Abdellatif Abdelrahman.
  • A Tougher Obama is needed to secure a Peaceful Divorce in Sudan. By: Dr. Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Lam Akols Flunkies Are His Worst Enemies!! By Luk Kuth Dak:
  • Dr. Josephine Lagus case exposes the nasty face of tribal politics in south Sudan. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Should Padang-Dinka community continue silent over Jongeli incident? By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Why Dr. Lam Akol Shouldnt Be The Minister Of Foreign Affairs!! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • The Not Inevitable War in Sudan: Goss vs. NPC By: Dr. Mohamed N Bushara
  • Agars snub on south Sudans independence must cease. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Scandalous Pipes Market Disaster or the Ponzi scheme in El-Fasher By Mahmoud A. Suleiman
  • Is American policy over Sudan invidious? By Izzadine Abdul Rasoul
  • An Independent South Sudan Is Vital to USA!! By Luk Kuth Dak
  • Lets SPLM Political Bureau be answerable to all current messes in the South By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • How bitter the injustice suffered, south Sudan must still come first. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Panaruu-Dinka historical, political naivety and leniency towards the SPLM by Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Western Equatoria: The will to resist and succeed. By: Justin Ambago Ramba.
  • Sudan Elections 2010: Defective beyond repair! By Arman Muhammad Ahmad
  • A Unified Sudanese Currency II by Abdel - Halim Anwar Mohamed Ahmed Mahgoub
  • voting in election is hallmark of demcracy by Siddik, Nadir Hashim
  • The Rigged Elections Boxes Should Be Disqualified By Dr. James Okuk
  • General election of Sudan By Aru Mayan:
  • Nasir Declaration was a well calculated move to destroy the Nuer tribe by Simon R. Gatluak,
  • the manifesto of the Sudanese Emancipation United Movement (SEUM) by Aguer Rual
  • When confusion steps in, then only a genuine change can help. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Lets your vote not throttle the CPA By Atok Dan
  • Watch out; is your transport fee to your voting centre available? By Atok Dan Baguoot
  • Delaying the Election is not a Good Option by Nhial K. Wicleek lives in Canada.
  • Are Independent candidates still SPLM members? I doubt BY: Isaiah Abraham, JUBA
  • The SPLM Party Is The Answer: By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • Dose general Scott Gration Understand get lost? by Hatim Elmedani*
  • SPLM Tactics of Scaring Away Voters in Southern Sudan By Dr. James Okuk
  • Civil liberty must precede the civil divorce. By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Seeking Justices for the Rape Victims of Terekeka.By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Will the National Election in Sudan takes place? By Federico Vuni
  • Southerners have better reasons to vote for H.E Salva Kiir Mayardit By: Gieth A. Dauson
  • Dr. Lam Akol SPLM-DC candidate reveals early defeat in Sudan April elections By Magdelina John
  • National Interest first By Kenjok D, Bentiu
  • Kiir declares the Central Equatoria State votes as insignificant! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Go to Hague! by Hatim El-Medani
  • Vote for Salva, Vote for Change, is it a Joke? Nhial K. Wicleek lives in Canada
  • President Kiir and VP Machar campaign rally in Bor, Jonglei is historic BY: Mawut Guarak , NEW YORK , USA
  • Watch out SPLA/M by Dr. Mawien Akot is a family physician in Wynyard, Canada.
  • Rushing or NOT, the CPA ends in 2011, IGAD reiterates! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • Medical Registrars threatening to go on strike over pay increase by By Federico Vuni
  • Your vote may land us into trouble! By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • The Future Of South Sudan Will Be Brighter Than Others Think! By: Luk Kuth Dak.
  • Opinion Poll on nominees for South Sudan Government by Shean Ashang
  • GOSS Corruption: Minister Awut Deng stops recruitment of diplomats BY: David Joseph Lomoro, JUBAs
  • Lam Akol set to meet his Waterloo By Majok Nikodemo Arou
  • Stop the Humanitarian Blockade of Jebel Marra, Darfur BY Dr. Anne Bartlett
  • Who is best leader for South Sudan after April? By DJames Okuk
  • Southerners have Perfected Political Hypocrisy and are becoming vendors.By: Justin Ambago Ramba, MD.
  • (JEM) has not intended to keep the Fellow Combatants out of the Darfur Peace Process By Mahmoud A. Suleiman