بيان صحفي وتقرير توثيقي:تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي" بين سيادة القانون وافتراءات ا

بيان صحفي وتقرير توثيقي:تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي" بين سيادة القانون وافتراءات ا


11-09-2026, 04:02 AM


  » http://sudaneseonline.com/cgi-bin/sdb/2bb.cgi?seq=msg&board=30&msg=1794196944&rn=0


Post: #1
Title: بيان صحفي وتقرير توثيقي:تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي" بين سيادة القانون وافتراءات ا
Author: بيانات سودانيزاونلاين
Date: 11-09-2026, 04:02 AM

04:02 AM November, 08 2026

سودانيز اون لاين
بيانات سودانيزاونلاين-USA
مكتبتى
رابط مختصر



بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
بيان صحفي وتقرير توثيقي للنشر العاجل
سكنية بقرية يات ال
إعلاءً لقيم الحقيقة، ودحضاً للأكاذيب ومحاولات الاستقطاب العنصري والجهوي التي صاحبت إجراءات إزالة التعد
المتكامل. طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي بولاية الجزيرة؛ يصدر هذا التقرير التوثيقي والتحليلي
لمطلبية
ا عن الجهات
لصادرة
يهدف هذا العمل الموثق إلى وضع الرأي العام أمام الحقائق التاريخية والقانونية الدامغة، وتفكيك البيانات ا
مضللة مارسات ال وكشف التناقض الصارخ بين الشعارات المرفوعة والم
-
وعلى رأسها تحالف السودان التأسيسي (تأسيس)
-
والسياسية
ي الشي لى الأرض، مع توثيق الدور الروحي والإنساني الأصيل الذي يضطلع به السجادة والمسيد تحت قيادة خليفته الحال
ح خ أحمد الري
ع
بن الشيخ عبد الله أزرق طيبة.
لاءً جتماعي وإع لا سيج ا
نأمل من كافة المنصات الإعلامية والأقلام الوطنية الحرة تداول هذا التقرير ونشره على أوسع نطاق حمايةً للن
لسيادة حكم القانون.
اسي
والسي
تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي" بين سيادة القانون وافتراءات الاستقطاب الإعلامي
التاريخي
والتأسيس
التوطئة
تأسيس
ية في ا ة والتاريخ بولاية الجزيرة واحدة من أهم المنارات الروحية والاجتماعي
لسودان. تم
"طيبة الشيخ عبد الباقي"
تعتبر قرية
ب عليها الخلفاء
1575 هذه القرية العريقة في عهد الدولة السنارية (السلطنة الزرقاء) عام
على يد الشيخ يوسف أبوشرا، وتعاق
م
مرانياً رسمياً اً ع
، شهدت القرية تخطيط
1925 والصالحون حتى حملت اسم حفيده الشيخ عبد الباقي (أزرق طيبة) عام
1972 م. وفي عام
م
لإشعاع
ل
، كمركز
ة زرق طيب أ
الشيخ أحمد الريح بن الشيخ عبد الله
وفتحاً لشوارعها، لتستمر مسيرتها التاريخية حتى عهد خليفته الحالي
الديني، والتربية، والتعايش المجتمعي الراسخ.
اللحظة
وليد
وليس
ممتد
قانوني
إجراء
:
الإزالات
حقيقة
اني
تخطيط العمر
ارة ال
شهدت القرية مؤخراً لغطاً إعلامياً حاداً صاحَبَ تنفيذ سلطات حماية الأراضي الحكومية وإدارة المخالفات بوز
اراً مفاجئاً،
وياً ولا قر
فاً جه
لإجراءات إزالة التعديات والسكن العشوائي. ووفقاً للوثائق والمستندات الرسمية، فإن هذا الإجراء ليس استهدا
لة وإعادة التعمير
، سعت فيه لجنة الخدمات والتسيير واللجنة المفوضة للإزا
2011 مجهود إداري وقانوني مستمر منذ عام
م
بل هو
عاماً لحماية الأراضي العامة وحرم القرية المخصص لأجيال المستقبل. 16 طوال
صل
ية قبل أن ت
للوجست
ي السابق بسبب التقلبات السياسية وا
وقد مرت عمليات الإنذار والمطالبة بالإزالة بأربع محطات أساسية تعطلت ف
2026 حد التنفيذ في نوفمبر
م:
2014 عام
م.
المرحلة الأولى:

2017 عام
م.
المرحلة الثانية:

2021 عام
م.
المرحلة الثالثة:

2026 نوفمبر
م.
المرحلة الحالية (التنفيذ):

التضليل
حملات
وتفنيد
الادعاءات
دحض
لعرقية
ا لومية
بعيداً الإعلامي
عن الضجيج الإعلامي وخطابات الاستقطاب والمزايدات، يقف الواقع على الأرض شاهداً على زيف دعاوى المظ
والمناطقية المفتعلة. ويمكن تفنيد هذه الادعاءات عبر الحقائق الدامغة التالية:
كثر
ا الأولى أ مرحلته
شملت الإزالة في
؛ حيث
لم تستهدف الإزالات مجموعة إثنية بعينها
العمومية وعدم الاستهداف العرقي:

لة
عيار الإزا
ؤكد أن م
ي ممن تعدوا على التخطيط العام، مما
منزلاً تعود لمواطنين من أبناء وبنات القرية أنفسهم
20 من
هندسي وقانوني بحت طُبّق دون فرز.
ولايات
بقها الدولة في مختلف ال
إن إزالة السكن العشوائي هي سياسة قومية راتبة تط
الجزيرة ليست استثناءً:
ها هذه ثار حول
ولاية الخرطوم (محليات أمبدة، وشرق النيل، وجبل أولياء، وبحري) عمليات إزالة واسعة دورية دون أن تُ ، حيث شهدت

التعبئة الإعلامية المقحمة، مما يكشف تسييس ملف الجزيرة افتعالاً.
بر مقاطع
ع تعطاف
الملكيات لا تُثبت بطول الإقامة الافتراضي أو بالاس
إن الحيازات و
الوثائق والمستندات هي الفيصل:

القرارات
الأوراق و
وي كافة
. وتؤكد لجنة التسيير أن لديها ملفاً كاملاً يح
الفيديو، بل بالوثائق وعقود الشراء الرسمية المعتمدة
الرسمية بطرف مصلحة الأراضي لمن أراد التحري والتحقق.
للإثنيات
العابرة
الإنسانية
والشهادة
الروحية
الروابط
: طيبة
إلى
تقلي
من
ان الق
ي ومي السودان
في مقابل خطابات التعبئة الرقمية والسياسية التي تحاول تصوير مسيد طيبة كمركز للإقصاء، يقف التاريخ والوجد
ذا الإرث
. ه
لطيبة"
لصلات ا
. رحلة السلام وا
"من تقلي إلى طيبة.
شاهداً على حقيقة مناقضة تماماً يبرزها المسار التاريخي المعنون بـ
لشيخ
ا
لجد المؤسس
عهد ا
يوثق كيف تأسست "الأخوة الروحية" العابرة للجهويات بين المسيد وأبناء جبال النوبة ومنطقة تقلي العريقة منذ
عبد الباقي أزرق طيبة.
بة" ان "مسيد طي
ك لنوبة،
استقطاباً عرقياً حاداً وممنهجاً في جبال ا
ففي الوقت الذي كان فيه النظام السابق يشن حروباً ضارية ويمارس
طلباً يمثل المساحة الوطنية الأرحب للتعايش؛ حيث كانت تفد إليه مئات السيارات المعبأة بمريدي وأبناء تلك المناطق
ربية للعلم والت
. إن النشاط الضيق
قية وتلاشت عنده خطوط الصراع الحزبي
الروحية، مما جعل المسيد مركزاً وطنياً جامعاً انصهرت فيه الفوارق العر
لك
ت دم من
الدعوي والتعليمي العريض للجد المؤسس في أصقاع جبال النوبة أسس لعلاقة رحم روحي لا تنفصم عراها، تجعل القا
المناطق صاحب دار وأخاً في الطريق الصوفي.
اؤود بولاية
د
ية (أبن بيان الطريقة القادرية العرك
اء الشيخ
ومي الواسع المتمثل في
وتأكيداً لهذا الدور الإنساني الممتد، جاء الموقف الق
آمناً حرب، ملاذاً ية وال مسيد طيبة ظل عبر التاريخ، ولا سيما خلال المحنة الحال
ليعيد الأمور إلى نصابها، مشدداً على أن
كسلا)
ريخياً ي محنتهم تا
لناس ف
ام ولم يُغلق الباب في وجه مستجير، فمن آوى ا
، حيث امتدت أيادي الكرم بالإيواء والإطع
للنازحين والوافدين
.
وحاضراً لا يمكن عقلاً ولا خلقاً أن يُختزل تاريخه في إشاعات كاذبة
1 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
الحقوقية
والمنظمات
المطلبية
الكيانات
مواقف
تفكيك
ن نسق ا ع ظمة مناصرة ضحايا دارفور
لشحن
من ولا الاتهامات الموجهة من
مركزية مؤتمر الكنابي
لا ينفصل الموقف الصادر عن
تصف إزالة
ل
قوقية
فعندما تخرج منظمة ح
.
الإعلامي الممنهج، بل يمثلان نموذجاً لمحاولة إلباس النزاعات التنظيمية ثوب الاضطهاد
قيقة أن معيار
ح لة
منزل، فإنها تقع في فخ التزييف الرقمي والجهوي، متجاه
200 التعديات السكنية بأنها "تمييز عنصري" طال نحو
لتجريد
ف فحسب الإزالة قانوني بحت طال أبناء القرية أنفسهم لحماية المخطط الهيكلي، مما يوضح أن إقحام لغة "العنصرية" يهد
مؤسسات الدولة من مصداقيتها القانونية.
ة
ادياً لإزال
اعتي
هدم باعتباره إجراءً وفي ذات السياق، يبرز التناقض البنيوي في بيان مركزية مؤتمر الكنابي التي ترفض تبرير ال
مكاتب
نذارات ات رسمية وإ
التعديات؛ فالبيان يطالب بنشر المستندات والقرارات القانونية، في حين أن ملف القضية بالكامل، بما يحويه من
مركزية بـ
مطالبة ال
م ومحفوظة لدى مصلحة الأراضي، متاح علناً لمن أراد التحقق والتحري. إن
2011 وقرارات ممتدة منذ عام
لبي.
ط المط
"التحقيق المستقل ووقف الإزالة" لا تعدو كونها محاولة لتعطيل سلطة القانون وفرض أمر واقع عشوائي بقوة الضغ
" تأسيس "
تحالف
تفكيك :
بيان
العسكري
والتحوير
السياسي
التوظيف
ن ر الأزمات م استثما
و
اضي الحكومية معزولة عن محاولات التوظيف
لم تكن الإجراءات الهندسية والتنظيمية التي نفذها جهاز حماية الأر
ان الص
ن ع حفي الصادر
. وقد تجلى هذا الاستغلال بوضوح في البي
قِبل المطابخ السياسية الموازية والمناوئة لشرعية الدولة السودانية
5 بتوقيع ناطقه الرسمي "أحمد تقد لسان" في
2026 مبر نوف
م.
تحالف السودان التأسيسي (تأسيس)
وعند إخضاع لغة البيان والاتهامات الواردة فيه للمجهر التحليلي، تتكشف المغالطات الاستراتيجية التالية:
منذ عام
لمستمر
حاول بيان التحالف إخراج قضية تنظيم الأراضي من سياقها الإداري ا
شيطنة مؤسسات الدولة والقانون:
.1
الربط
. إن هذا
مجموعة بورتسودان"*
*"
وموجّهة سياسياً مما يصفونه بـ
الضرر"
"أداة لإلحاق
م، واصفاً إياها بأنها
2011
م)، لربط
2021 ،
2017 ،
2014
القسري يتعامى عمداً عن التاريخ الإداري الموثق ومحاولات التنفيذ المتعاقبة في الأعوام (
.
إجراء هندسي راتب بظرف الصراع السياسي الحالي تزييفاً للحقيقة
"التهجير ثل م شحونة م تعمد بيان التحالف استخدام عبارات فضفاضة
ة المواطنين وصناعة الاستقطاب العرقي: استغلال معانا
.2
كومية إ و*"استهداف مكونات اجتماعية معينة"* بهدف تحويل مسألة حماية حرم القرية وتنظيم أراضيها الح
لى صراع
القسري"
خليفة ماعية ل
ي محاولة بائسة للنيل من الرمزية الروحية والاجت
إثني وجهوي يستهدف المكونات الاجتماعية بالجزيرة، ف
السجادة العركية الشيخ أحمد الريح، ورفض مبدأ سيادة القانون الذي لا يستثني أحداً.
النشطاء
وتحريض
"
الإثني
الشحن "
منطق :
المحتوى
وصناعة
الرقمي
الإعلام
ات
لأطروح ا
امتد التجييش الإعلامي ليتغذى على منصات التواصل الاجتماعي عبر قنوات البث المباشر، وهو ما تجلى بوضوح في
تيجية الا . يعتمد هذا النمط من الخطاب على استرا
بتزاز ضد
غداً نعود"
-
"مصطفى
الموجهة من بعض النشطاء الرقميين، مثل الناشط
مستنكراً صم
سائلاً الأقاليم (مثل مالك عقار، د. جبريل إبراهيم، مني أركو مناوي، ومبارك أردول)، مت
و
. ويهدف هذا التكتيك صراحة إلى الضغط على هذه القيادات وابتزازها سياسياً تهم
قيادات الدولة المنحدرة من
ارها على
لإجب
"
عما يسميه "تطهير عرق وتهجير قسري
ي حي والتاريخ حم الرو
وتنظيم الأراضي، متجاهلاً إدراك هذه القيادات الواعية لطبيعة الر
اتخاذ مواقف مناهضة لسلطات إنفاذ القانون
الذي يربط مناطقهم بمسيد طيبة، ويقينهم بأن الإجراء هندسي تنظيمي بحت.
لمجتمعات
ا
قن لإ كما يحاول هذا المحتوى الرقمي عولمة الصراع عبر الربط التعسفي بين تنظيم الأراضي وإجراءات "الرقم الوطني"
اع
لـ
لتبعية
ا
، صعوداً إلى مربع التحريض الصريح الذي يحث المتضررين على رفض
مواطنين من الدرجة الثانية"
"
بأنها تعامل كـ
باشراً م
داً د
مما يشكل مه
"المركز" أو "دولة الجلابة" وبناء مسار خاص والتمرد على القوانين العمرانية ومواجهة لجان التسيير المحلية،
لم والتعايش الاجتماعي التاريخي الذي تميزت به ولاية الجزيرة.
للس
والعدالة
الفيدرالية
شعارات
تهاوي :
مفاهيمية
تحليلية
خاتمة
رية وا يكشف تفكيك مواقف تحالف "تأسيس" والنشطاء الرقميين في سياق شعاراتهم المرفوعة حول "الفيدرالية" ودولة "الح
لسلام
ختبار عملي ي أول ا
عميق بين النظرية السياسية والممارسة الحقيقية على الأرض، حيث يسقط هذا الخطاب ف
والعدالة" عن تناقض بنيوي
لسيادة القانون وبناء المؤسسات؛ وتتجلى هذه الفجوة في ثلاثة محاور رئيسية:
لطات واسعة
لو
س لايات
يقوم نظام الحكم الفيدرالي في جوهره على منح ا
الفيدرالية بين تنظيم الأقاليم وشرعنة الفوضى:

ن أن يدعم
بدلاً م
و
لإدارة شؤونها المحلية، وعلى رأسها التخطيط العمراني لحماية حرمات القرى العامة والتنمية المحلية.
ن هذه الإجراءات
م، خرج البيان ليشيط
2011 التحالف سلطات ولاية الجزيرة المحلية في ممارسة دورها الدستوري الممتد منذ
ة السكن اتبة. وبذلك، تتحول الفيدرالية في خطاب التحالف من أداة لبناء المؤسسات إلى غطاء لشرعن
العشوائي
الإدارية الر
والتعدي، لمجرد تحقيق مكاسب وتعبئة سياسية عابرة.
فرز، ن الجميع دو
قه على
تعني العدالة إعلاء كلمة القانون وتطبي
مفهوم "العدالة" بين سيادة القانون والمحاصصة الجهوية:

ف يان التحال
ب ي. لكن
وهو ما حدث بالفعل حين شملت الإزالة منازل لأبناء وبنات قرية طيبة أنفسهم طالما ثبت تجاوزهم الهندس
جعل العدالة ي سمية، مما دات الر
يختزل "العدالة" في حماية المخالفين استناداً إلى انتماءاتهم الجغرافية أو العرقية متجاهلاً المستن
ات
ام عن ذ
" في الجزيرة، بينما يتم الصمت الت
وية؛ حيث يُصنف تطبيق القانون على أنه "استهداف ممنهج
مشروطة باله
الإجراءات القانونية في الخرطوم، وهو ما يضرب مبدأ "المواطنة المتساوية" في مقتل.
والنأي
جتمعي لسلم الم
تستوجب دعاوى الحرية والسلام صيانة ا
"الحرية والسلام" مقابل خطابات الشحن والاستقطاب:

ود في إيوا ي المشه
ء
بالمنارات الروحية (مثل مسيد طيبة وخليفته) عن التجاذبات العسكرية والسياسية، نظراً لدورها الإنسان
القسري"
التهجير
وإطعام آلاف النازحين والوافدين إبان الحرب. إلا أن بيان التحالف اعتمد لغة حادة ومشحونة بعبارات "
يزرع
ف الممنهج"، وهي لغة تعمد إلى تحويل خلاف هندسي حول أرض حكومية إلى صراع عرق ومناطق، مما
و"الاستهدا
ر. بذور الكراهية والفتنة المجتمعية، ويستثمر في المعاناة لخدمة أجندة سياسية وعسكرية مناوئة للاستقرا
2 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
ا
بتزاز
حن لسياسي والش
" تُستخدم كأدوات "تكتيكية" للا
تأسيس
توضح هذه القراءة التحليلية المفاهيمية أن الشعارات البراقة لـتحالف "
يمية التي ت التنظ
قوم
الجهوي، وليس كمبادئ "استراتيجية" لبناء دولة المؤسسات، حيث ترفض هذه المنظومة السياسية تطبيق ذات المبادئ
ضد نسيج ولاية الجزيرة.
عليها أي دولة في العالم بمجرد أن تتعارض مع خطتها في صناعة المظلوميات المفتعلة
النهائية
التوصيات
قانون في وفق ال
يوصي التقرير بضرورة استمرار السلطات المختصة بولاية الجزيرة في حسم ملفات السكن العشوائي وتقنينها

كافة القرى والمدن دون فرز.
مؤسسات لرسمية وال
وراق ا
ة، والاحتكام إلى الأ
يناشد التقرير الرأي العام ومنابر الإعلام بالابتعاد عن خطابات الفتنة والكراهي

العدلية، واحترام المقام الروحي للمشايخ وأهل التربية والإرشاد والنأي بهم عن التجاذبات السياسية.
والله من وراء القصد وهو يهدي السبيل.
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
Press Statement and Comprehensive Documentary and Analytical Report for
Immediate Publication
Taiba Al-Sheikh Abdulbaqi, Al Jazirah State: Historicalunding the removal of
unauthorised residential structures in the village of Taiba Al-Sheikh Abdulbaqi,
in Al Jazirah State.
The purpose of this report is to present the public with the relevant historical, legal
and social facts, free from misinformation and attempts to exploit the matter for
political, regional or racial agendas.
The report examines the historical background and legal dimensions of the case. It
also provides a critical assessment of statements and positions issued by
certain advocacy and political groups, particularly the Sudan Founding Alliance
(TASIS), by examining their content against the relevant facts, information and
supporting documentation. This analysis seeks to identify any discrepancies
between the public statements made and the actual circumstances on the
ground.
Furthermore, the report highlights the longstanding spiritual, social and
humanitarian role of the Qadiriyya Sufi Order and its religious centre (Al-Masjid)
in Taiba Al-Sheikh Abdulbaqi. It recognises the historical and religious
significance of this institution within Sudanese society and highlights the role of
its current spiritual leader and Khalifa, Sheikh Ahmed Al-Rayah, son of Sheikh
Abdullah Azraq Taiba, in safeguarding this spiritual, historical and social
heritage.
This report emphasises that matters relating to land ownership, housing and
alleged encroachments must be addressed through documentary evidence,
established facts and proper legal procedures. Such matters must also remain
free from hate speech, accusations and divisive rhetoric, in order to safeguard
social harmony and national unity.
Accordingly, we call upon media institutions, journalists, writers and independent
national media platforms to review, circulate and publish this report as widely as
possible. This will contribute to informing public opinion, correcting inaccurate
information, protecting social cohesion and upholding the fundamental
principles of justice and the rule of law.
DOCUMENTARY AND ANALYTICAL REPORT
Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi Between the Rule of Law and Media and Political
Polarisation Campaigns
A Historical, Legal, Social and Media Analysis of the Background to Demolition
Measures Against Unauthorised Structures and Their Implications for Social
Cohesion
3 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Introduction and Historical Background
Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi, located in Gezira State, is regarded as one of Sudan's
most prominent historical, religious and social centres. It holds a distinguished
place in Sudanese spiritual and Sufi heritage, having played an important role
throughout its history in promoting religious education, spiritual guidance, social
solidarity and peaceful coexistence among different components of Sudanese
society.
According to the historical accounts associated with the village, its origins date
back to the era of the Funj Sultanate (the Blue Sultanate) in 1575, when it was
established by Sheikh Yousif Abu Shara. Successive generations of religious
leaders, successors and scholars contributed to its development, eventually
leading to its association with the name of Sheikh Abdelbagi Azraq Tayba,
whose name became closely identified with the village from 1925 onwards.
In 1972, the village underwent an important phase of urban development, including
formal town planning and the opening of roads. This represented a significant
step towards organising its urban structure, protecting public facilities and
ensuring that sufficient space remained available for future generations.
This religious and social heritage has continued through successive generations,
reaching the current leader of the Araki Sufi Order, Sheikh Ahmed Al-Rayeh,
son of Sheikh Abdullah Azraq Tayba. Under his leadership, responsibility for
preserving the historical and spiritual standing of the religious centre, as well as
its social and humanitarian role, continues.
Consequently, any discussion of the recent developments in Tayba must take into
account its historical significance and spiritual standing. Equally, disputes
concerning land and urban planning should not become an opportunity to
4 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
undermine the village's reputation or damage relations between its different social
communities.
Background to the Demolitions and Their Legal and Administrative Nature
Recently, Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi has witnessed considerable media
controversy following the implementation of measures to remove unauthorised
structures and settlements considered inconsistent with the approved urban
plan. These operations were reportedly carried out by the relevant authorities
responsible for government land protection and violations under the Ministry of
Urban Planning.
According to information provided by the local Services and Management
Committee and the committee mandated to oversee demolition and
reconstruction, the current measures are neither a sudden decision nor a newly
introduced policy arising from recent political developments.
Rather, they form part of an administrative and legal process dating back to 2011,
concerning the protection of public land, preservation of the village's approved
master plan and safeguarding roads, public facilities and designated areas for
future development.
According to the committees concerned, attempts to address the violations and
remove unauthorised structures have passed through several stages.
Implementation was previously delayed due to political, administrative and
logistical circumstances.
The principal stages identified are as follows:
First stage: 2014.
Second stage: 2017.
Third stage: 2021.
Fourth stage: Implementation in November 2026.
If supported by official correspondence, notices and administrative decisions, this
chronology demonstrates the importance of treating the matter as an ongoing
land administration and urban planning issue, rather than reducing it to
predetermined political or ethnic interpretations.
Nevertheless, the legality of demolition measures cannot be established solely by
the length of time an administrative file has existed. Their legitimacy must also
depend on compliance with applicable laws, the validity of decisions issued by
competent authorities, clearly established land boundaries, evidence of
violations and respect for the rights of affected individuals, including their right
to appeal and seek legal remedies.
The rule of law therefore requires two complementary principles: protecting public
land and approved development plans on the one hand, and safeguarding
citizens' property and housing rights by ensuring that demolitions take place
only through lawful procedures on the other.
The Facts Under Discussion and Responses to Allegations Concerning the Nature
of the Demolitions
The demolition operations have generated several allegations linking the measures
to the targeting of particular social or ethnic groups. These allegations require
careful examination based on evidence and documentation, while distinguishing
between established facts, claims and matters that remain disputed.
5 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
The Demolition Criteria and Their Application to All Citizens
Information provided by the local management committee indicates that previous
demolition operations affected more than twenty houses belonging to residents
of Tayba itself, including men and women from the village, because the
properties were reportedly located in areas that conflicted with the approved
urban plan.
If confirmed through demolition records, maps and official documents, this would
represent an important indication that urban planning measures were not
exclusively directed at people arriving from outside the village or members of a
particular social group.
However, conclusively establishing the absence of discrimination requires the
publication of clear information concerning the locations affected, the number of
properties demolished, the nature of the violations, ownership or occupancy
status, and the criteria used by the authorities to identify the properties
concerned.
The appropriate criterion should not be an individual's identity or geographical
origin, but rather the legal status of the land, the nature of the alleged violation
and the procedures followed.
Demolition Operations and Urban Planning in Other Sudanese States
Addressing informal settlements and encroachments on public land is not an issue
exclusive to Gezira State. Different Sudanese states and local authorities have
witnessed campaigns aimed at regulating land use and removing unauthorised
structures.
Examples cited in this report include operations in the localities of Ombada, East
Nile, Jebel Aulia and Bahri in Khartoum State.
Accordingly, developments in Tayba should be considered within the broader
context of land administration and urban planning across Sudan, without
assuming that all cases are identical in their legal or social circumstances.
A meaningful comparison requires examining the nature of the violations, the legal
procedures followed, the rights of affected residents and whether consistent
standards have been applied to comparable cases.
Official Documentation as the Primary Reference for Establishing Land Rights
Official documents, land registry records, approved maps, ownership deeds and
legally recognised occupancy documents remain essential instruments for
determining rights relating to land.
In this context, the local management committee states that it possesses a
comprehensive file containing relevant correspondence, decisions, notices and
supporting documents, which are held by the competent Land Department
authorities.
These documents should be made available for administrative and legal review,
allowing citizens, human rights organisations and media representatives to
independently verify the facts.
At the same time, long-term residence and the presence of families in a particular
location should not be disregarded when examining the humanitarian and social
dimensions of the issue, even though residence alone does not necessarily
establish legal ownership.
6 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Ultimately, disputes should be resolved according to the law and relevant
documentation, while taking into account the humanitarian circumstances and
legal protections owed to affected residents.
From Taqali to Tayba: Spiritual and Historical Relationships Beyond Ethnic
Boundaries
One of the most important aspects to consider when discussing Tayba Al-Sheikh
Abdelbagi is its historical spiritual and social relationship with different regions
of Sudan, particularly the Nuba Mountains and the historic Taqali region.
For generations, Tayba's religious centre has maintained extensive spiritual and
humanitarian relationships with people from these regions through the Araki
Qadiri Sufi Order and its values of love, tolerance, spiritual education and social
connection.
Under the theme "From Taqali to Tayba: A Journey of Peace and Enduring
Relationships", an important aspect of this heritage can be explored,
documenting the historical connections between the religious centre and its
followers, relationships that have transcended geographical, ethnic and political
boundaries.
Historical accounts associated with the centre indicate that Sheikh Abdelbagi
Azraq Tayba contributed to expanding religious outreach and spiritual education
among communities in the Nuba Mountains and Taqali region. Large numbers
of followers reportedly travelled to Tayba seeking religious knowledge, spiritual
guidance and education.
These relationships acquire particular significance when considered against the
political and security circumstances experienced by the Nuba Mountains during
years of armed conflict, which were accompanied by considerable social and
political divisions.
Despite these circumstances, the spiritual connections between Tayba and people
from these regions reportedly continued to provide an important space for
social and humanitarian interaction at a time when Sudan was experiencing
severe political polarisation and armed conflict.
This heritage deserves recognition and documentation, not as proof that
contemporary disputes cannot exist, but as evidence that human and spiritual
relationships between Sudanese communities are much broader than any
individual dispute concerning land or administrative decisions.
The Humanitarian Role of the Religious Centre During the War
The role of Tayba has not been limited to religious and spiritual activities. It has
also extended to humanitarian and social assistance, particularly during the war
in Sudan.
According to accounts and testimonies, the religious centre has served as a place
of refuge, accommodation and food assistance for displaced people and other
arrivals seeking safety and support.
The Araki Qadiri Order's statement, issued by followers of Sheikh Daoud in
Kassala State, also highlighted the historical humanitarian and social
importance of Tayba and its tradition of welcoming displaced people and those
affected by the exceptional circumstances facing the country.
These testimonies and statements form an important part of the centre's social
record and demonstrate the importance of preserving its inclusive role.
7 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Its historical relationships with followers and communities throughout Sudan should
not be undermined by political or social disputes.
Positions of Advocacy Groups and Human Rights Organisations
Statements issued by certain advocacy groups and human rights organisations
concerning demolition operations in Tayba have generated considerable
discussion about the nature of the measures, their legality and their potential
social consequences.
Among the organisations mentioned in this context are the Central Committee of
the Kanabi Conference and the Darfur Victims Support Organisation, which
have expressed concerns and criticism regarding the demolitions and their
potential humanitarian and social consequences.
In examining these positions, it is essential to distinguish between the legitimate
right to express human rights concerns and the need to establish allegations of
discrimination or systematic targeting through verifiable evidence.
Where a human rights organisation describes demolition operations as ethnic
targeting or forced displacement affecting approximately 200 homes, such
claims should be subjected to independent verification. This should include
comparing the properties affected, their locations, their legal status and the
criteria applied by the authorities.
Equally, rejecting these allegations solely on the basis that administrative
procedures existed beforehand is insufficient. The relevant authorities should
provide maps, decisions and documentation demonstrating the legal basis for
each case.
The Central Committee of the Kanabi Conference's demand for the publication of
documents and decisions, alongside an independent investigation, should
therefore be treated as a legitimate demand for institutional accountability and
transparency, rather than automatically characterised as opposition to the rule
of law or an attempt to obstruct the authorities.
The rule of law is not incompatible with human rights oversight. Similarly, protecting
human rights does not mean removing the state's authority to regulate public
land.
An independent investigation, where appropriate, should be viewed as a means of
strengthening public confidence, establishing responsibility, correcting
procedural errors and protecting the legitimate rights of all parties.
Political Instrumentalisation of the Crisis in the Statement by the Sudan Founding
Alliance (TASIS)
The issue of Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi entered a wider political debate following
the publication of a press statement attributed to the Sudan Founding Alliance
(TASIS), reportedly signed by its official spokesperson, Ahmed Taq Lisan, on 5
November 2026.
The statement linked the demolition operations to the broader political and military
developments in Sudan and employed descriptions relating to forced
displacement and the systematic targeting of particular social groups.
This position warrants an objective examination of the statement's contents and a
comparison with the administrative and legal background that local authorities
claim has existed for several years.
Linking Administrative Procedures to Political Conflict
8 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
One of the principal issues requiring examination is the attempt to interpret urban
planning measures as an extension of the political conflict between competing
forces in Sudan, linking them to what the political discourse describes as
particular groups or centres of influence.
However, establishing political motives behind a specific administrative decision
requires evidence beyond the mere coincidence of timing or political
disagreement.
If the administrative procedures genuinely began in 2011 and were subject to
implementation attempts in 2014, 2017 and 2021, these developments, once
verified through official documentation, must be considered when analysing the
background to the decision.
Nevertheless, the historical existence of an administrative file should not be used to
close the door to scrutiny or to rule out possible errors in the current
implementation process.
The Use of Terms Such as Forced Displacement and Systematic Targeting
The use of serious legal and human rights terminology, including forced
displacement, ethnic cleansing and systematic targeting, requires specific
evidence concerning the nature of the alleged violations, the responsible parties
and the circumstances in which the events occurred.
Such descriptions should not automatically be applied simply because demolition
operations have taken place. Equally, they should not be dismissed in advance
without examining the available evidence.
The determining factors should include independent investigation, the legal status
of the land, compliance with relevant procedures, the nature of the harm
suffered by residents and whether discriminatory treatment occurred between
comparable cases.
Turning the issue into an exchange of political accusations does not help establish
the truth. Instead, it risks increasing polarisation and damaging social
relationships.
Protecting Religious and Social Institutions from Political Polarisation
The Araki Sufi Order and Tayba's religious centre represent historical spiritual and
social institutions with extensive national connections.
It is important to preserve their religious, educational and humanitarian
independence from political and military conflicts.
Discussions concerning land administration should remain within the responsibility
of the relevant administrative and legal authorities, without turning
disagreements into confrontations with religious leaders or the communities
associated with them.
In this context, protecting the standing of the current spiritual leader, Sheikh
Ahmed Al-Rayeh, and respecting the historical heritage of the religious centre
does not mean exempting any party from legal accountability.
Rather, it means ensuring that administrative disputes are not used as a pretext for
attacking a religious institution or its followers.
Digital Media and the Creation of Social Polarisation
Social media platforms have become major spaces in which public attitudes
towards local developments are shaped.
9 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Some live broadcasts and digital content relating to the Tayba issue have
contributed to extending the debate beyond its original administrative and local
context.
One example mentioned in this report is content published by an activist known as
"Mustafa - Tomorrow We Return" (Mustafa - Ghad-an Na'ud), who has
discussed the issue from a political and social perspective, linking it to the
positions of several political leaders originating from different regions of Sudan.
This style of discourse includes references to figures such as Malik Agar, Jibril
Ibrahim, Minni Arko Minnawi and Mubarak Ardol, raising questions about their
positions on the demolitions and what has been described as the targeting of
certain social groups.
It is important, however, to distinguish between the legitimate right to demand that
political leaders clarify their positions on human rights issues and the use of
their geographical or ethnic identities as a means of applying political pressure.
Public debate is a legitimate right, and holding political leaders accountable is a
normal feature of any society. However, such engagement should be based on
facts and evidence rather than attributing collective responsibility to individuals
because of their origins or regional affiliations.
Linking the Land Issue to Citizenship and National Identification
One aspect deserving particular attention is the attempt to connect demolition
operations with other issues, including the national identification system and
alleged discrimination in access to civil rights.
Although these are important matters, they require independent evidence and clear
legal and administrative examination. They should not automatically be
incorporated into the land dispute without establishing a direct connection.
Every Sudanese citizen is entitled to equal rights under the law, and no individual
should be deprived of those rights because of their ethnic background,
geographical origin or social identity.
At the same time, an individual administrative dispute should not be used to make
general conclusions about citizenship rights or the relationship between central
government and the regions.
The Risks of Turning Administrative Disputes into Social Confrontation
Any discourse encouraging rejection of institutions, confrontation with local
committees or the transformation of administrative disputes into conflicts
between social communities carries genuine risks to social peace.
Rights-based demands should remain within legal and civil frameworks, with
objections expressed through judicial institutions, administrative procedures and
peaceful means.
It is equally important to avoid generalisations about entire communities and the
use of language that could encourage hatred or deepen divisions.
Gezira State, with its rich social and cultural diversity, needs responsible public
discourse that protects relationships between neighbours and promotes
coexistence and mutual support among all its residents.
Federalism, Justice and the Rule of Law in the Context of the Crisis
The Tayba case highlights the importance of examining political and constitutional
principles through their practical application, rather than relying solely on
general political slogans.
10 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
It also demonstrates the importance of ensuring that concepts such as federalism,
justice, freedom and peace are not used selectively.
Federalism: State Powers and Responsibility for Local Planning
In principle, a federal system is based on the distribution of powers and
responsibilities between different levels of government, allowing regional and
local authorities to manage their affairs within the powers established by the
constitution and applicable laws.
Urban planning and land administration are important responsibilities that require
clear legal jurisdiction and coordination between state, local and relevant
federal authorities.
From this perspective, Gezira State's exercise of its legal responsibilities in
regulating land use and protecting public facilities should be respected,
provided that such measures comply with applicable laws and regulations and
safeguard citizens' rights.
Conversely, challenging decisions made by local authorities does not necessarily
constitute opposition to federalism. It may represent a legitimate exercise of the
right to seek judicial review, oversight and accountability.
True federalism does not mean obstructing the law, nor does it grant authorities
unlimited power without oversight. Rather, it requires a balance between
jurisdiction, responsibility and individual rights.
Justice: Equality Before the Law and the Protection of Rights
Justice is not achieved merely by implementing administrative decisions, nor is it
achieved simply by opposing them.
Justice requires the equal application of the law to everyone, alongside respect for
legal procedures, property and legitimate occupancy rights, and the right of
affected individuals to understand the reasons behind decisions and challenge
them where appropriate.
If it is established that demolition operations also affected residents of Tayba itself
because of comparable violations, this would constitute an important factor in
assessing the consistency of implementation.
However, the final assessment must be based on examining each case
individually, verifying the legal status of the land and reviewing the procedures
followed.
Equal citizenship does not mean exempting anyone from the law because of their
identity. Equally, it does not mean depriving anyone of their rights because of
their ethnic or regional background.
Freedom and Peace: Protecting Diversity and Preventing Hate Speech
The principles of freedom and peace require protecting citizens' right to express
their opinions and concerns while also safeguarding society against incitement,
discrimination and hate speech.
Religious and social institutions, including Tayba's religious centre, should remain
spaces for communication, solidarity and spiritual education, independent of
political and military alignments.
Advocating for the rights of affected residents should not become an excuse for
collectively attacking other communities. Likewise, defending government
decisions should not become an excuse for denying humanitarian suffering or
restricting citizens' right to object.
11 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Building a state based on institutions requires respect for both the law and
individual rights, with justice, accountability and transparency serving as
indispensable foundations for peace and stability.
Overall Conclusions
An examination of Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi's historical background, the nature of
the land dispute and the statements issued by various parties leads to several
important observations:
First: Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi represents a historical, spiritual and social
institution with an established place in Sudanese national heritage. Preserving
this legacy is a collective responsibility that extends beyond political and
administrative disagreements.
Second: According to the local management committee, the demolition file dates
back several years and passed through multiple stages before implementation
in November 2026. This makes the publication of official documents essential to
establishing the chronology and legal background of the procedures.
Third: Allegations of ethnic or regional targeting, as well as categorical denials of
such allegations, should not be based solely on political statements. They must
be assessed through an objective investigation of the demolition criteria, land
status and procedures followed.
Fourth: The spiritual and humanitarian role of Tayba's religious centre, together
with its historical relationships with the communities of Taqali, the Nuba
Mountains and other Sudanese regions, represents a national heritage that
deserves recognition and protection.
Fifth: Statements issued by political alliances, advocacy groups and human rights
organisations should be subject to discussion and verification, while respecting
their right to express concerns and demand accountability. Differences of
opinion should not be transformed into social conflict.
Sixth: The rule of law requires not only the protection of public land but also the
safeguarding of citizens' rights, transparent decision-making, access to appeal
procedures and independent investigation of any potential violations.
Accordingly, the most appropriate way to address the Tayba issue is through the
strengthening of legal and judicial institutions, publication of relevant
documents, removal of political and ethnic polarisation from the debate, and
protection of the rights of all parties alongside the village's historical and
spiritual standing.
Final Recommendations
Based on the above analysis, this report makes the following recommendations:
Publication of Official Documentation
Make available the official decisions, correspondence, notices and approved maps
relating to the land issue, enabling independent verification of the legal basis for
the measures taken.
Independent Legal Review
Conduct an independent review of the demolition cases to establish the legality of
the procedures, verify land boundaries and the nature of the alleged violations,
and consider any complaints or allegations of misconduct.
12 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
Equal Application of the Law
Continue addressing encroachments on public land across all areas in accordance
with consistent legal and urban planning standards, without discrimination
based on social, ethnic or political affiliation.
Protection of Affected Residents' Rights
Ensure that residents can submit objections and appeals, verify ownership and
occupancy documents, and receive the legal and humanitarian safeguards
required before any demolition is carried out.
Protection of Social Peace
Call upon religious, community and political leaders to avoid rhetoric that
encourages ethnic or regional hostility and instead work towards resolving
disagreements through dialogue and the relevant institutions.
Responsible and Accurate Media Reporting
Encourage media organisations and activists to distinguish between verified
information, allegations and political interpretations, and to avoid circulating
figures or serious accusations without independently verifiable sources.
Preserving the Standing of Tayba's Religious Centre
Protect the religious, educational and humanitarian independence of the centre,
while respecting its historical significance and longstanding relationships with
different Sudanese communities.
Documenting Spiritual and Humanitarian Heritage
Undertake efforts to collect historical testimonies, documents and accounts
documenting Tayba's relationships with Taqali, the Nuba Mountains and other
Sudanese regions, thereby strengthening the national record of coexistence
and social connection.
Establishing Institutional Dialogue
Create a framework for dialogue between government authorities, local
committees, representatives of affected residents and human rights
organisations to identify lawful and practical solutions that protect rights and
prevent further disputes.
Conclusion
Tayba Al-Sheikh Abdelbagi is not merely a geographical location or an urban
settlement. It represents a long-standing heritage of spiritual education, human
relationships and social solidarity that has connected Sudanese people from
different regions and backgrounds.
Preserving its standing therefore requires more than emotional rhetoric or rejecting
public scrutiny. It requires protecting its historical legacy, respecting its
institutions and upholding the values of justice, tolerance and peaceful
coexistence.
Protecting public land and regulating urban development are legal responsibilities
that must never become instruments of discrimination or exclusion. Equally,
defending people's rights must never become a pretext for spreading hatred or
deepening social divisions.
13 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ
The rule of law, social justice and the protection of human dignity are
complementary principles, not competing objectives. They provide the
foundation upon which the Tayba issue, and similar cases throughout Sudan,
should be addressed.
Tayba, which has historically brought people together through love, spiritual
guidance and mutual respect, deserves to remain a bridge for communication
and national unity, rather than a platform for conflict and polarisation.
And Allah is the ultimate source of guidance, and He guides to the right path.
14 عبد الباقي" تقرير توثيقي وتحليلي: "طيبة الشيخ