Away from politics - Linguistic Archeology from Sudan:

The same Arabic sentence structures apply to English as well as Halfawieen language. This is clear in sentences such as “white House”, “foot ball”, and “your house”, but most importantly, the ultimate prove is that the language used by the total of fifty five tribes of Southern Sudan is “Arabi Juba”.
In this regard, the relationship between the languages of three tribes of the South to Arabic is similar to the one that exists between French, Italian, and Portuguese languages, all of which are branches of the Latin Language, even though the relationship with the Latin language no more exists. This is unlike the case in the fifty five tribes of the South which still maintains relationship with Arabic language.
We can conclude that linguistic archeology and historic human archeology are absolute prove of the existence of social networks but the difference is that linguistic archeology is intangible compared to historic human archeology, which is tangible.
It would be extremely useful to conduct studies to identify the nature of historic relationships which enabled the Meedop of Sudan to speak old German language, the Algerians and the Malians to speak Halfawieen language, and the English to speak the Dungulawi language. Is this because that Germans are descendents of the Meedop? Or the Dinka, the Shuluk, and the Nuwair are descendents of the Arabs? Or the similarities in the way they structure their sentences?

Arabic Forum